PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Crocker, Britni AU - Ostrowski, Lauren AU - Williams, Ziv M. AU - Dougherty, Darin D. AU - Eskandar, Emad N. AU - Widge, Alik S. AU - Chu, Catherine J. AU - Cash, Sydney S. AU - Paulk, Angelique C. TI - Local and Distant responses to single pulse electrical stimulation reflect different forms of connectivity AID - 10.1101/2020.10.13.20212266 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.10.13.20212266 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/15/2020.10.13.20212266.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/15/2020.10.13.20212266.full AB - Background Measuring connectivity in the human brain can involve innumerable approaches using both noninvasive (fMRI, EEG) and invasive (intracranial EEG or iEEG) recording modalities, including the use of external probing stimuli, such as direct electrical stimulation.Objective/Hypothesis To examine how different measures of connectivity correlate with one another, we compared ‘passive’ measures of connectivity during resting state conditions map to the more ‘active’ probing measures of connectivity with single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES).Methods We measured the network engagement and spread of the cortico-cortico evoked potential (CCEP) induced by SPES at 53 total sites across the brain, including cortical and subcortical regions, in patients with intractable epilepsy (N=11) who were undergoing intracranial recordings as a part of their clinical care for identifying seizure onset zones. We compared the CCEP network to functional, effective, and structural measures of connectivity during a resting state in each patient. Functional and effective connectivity measures included correlation or Granger causality measures applied to stereoEEG (sEEGs) recordings. Structural connectivity was derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquired before intracranial electrode implant and monitoring (N=8).Results The CCEP network was most similar to the resting state voltage correlation network in channels near to the stimulation location. In contrast, the distant CCEP network was most similar to the DTI network. Other connectivity measures were not as similar to the CCEP network.Conclusions These results demonstrate that different connectivity measures, including those derived from active stimulation-based probing, measure different, complementary aspects of regional interrelationships in the brain.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by NINDS-K24 [K24-NS088568-01A1]; the Tiny Blue Dot Foundation; and the United States Department of Energy Computational Sciences Graduate Fellowship [DE-FG02-97ER25308] to BC. This research was sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Office and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-14-2-0045 issued by ARO contracting office in support of DARPA's SUBNETS Program. The views, opinions, and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All patients provided informed consent to participate in any experiments, which were approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Committee On the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects following the National Institutes of Health and Army Human Research Protection Office guidelines.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data underlying the study will be made available upon reasonable request.