RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 School closures and SARS-CoV-2. Evidence from Sweden’s partial school closure
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.13.20211359
DO 10.1101/2020.10.13.20211359
A1 Vlachos, Jonas
A1 Hertegård, Edvin
A1 Svaleryd, Helena
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/14/2020.10.13.20211359.abstract
AB To reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 most countries closed schools, despite uncertainty if school closures are an effective containment measure. At the onset of the pandemic, Swedish upper secondary schools moved to online instruction while lower secondary school remained open. This allows for a comparison of parents and teachers differently exposed to open and closed schools, but otherwise facing similar conditions. Leveraging rich Swedish register data, we connect all students and teachers in Sweden to their families and study the impact of moving to online instruction on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. We find that among parents, exposure to open rather than closed schools resulted in a small increase in PCR-confirmed infections [OR 1.15; CI95 1.03–1.27]. Among lower secondary teachers the infection rate doubled relative to upper secondary teachers [OR 2.01; CI95 1.52–2.67]. This spilled over to the partners of lower secondary teachers who had a higher infection rate than their upper secondary counterparts [OR 1.30; CI95 1.00–1.68]. When analyzing COVID-19 diagnoses from healthcare visits and the incidence of severe health outcomes, results are similar for teachers but somewhat weaker for parents and teachers’ partners. The results for parents indicate that keeping lower secondary schools open had minor consequences for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in society. The results for teachers suggest that measures to protect teachers could be considered.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe are grateful for financial support from Handelsbankens forskningssiftelser.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was approved by the Swedish Ethical Approval Board on May 19, 2020 (decision number 2020-02323).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used for the analysis have been obtained by combining several administrative registers collected and held by three government agencies: Statistics Sweden, The National Board of Health and Welfare and The Public Health Authority. Access to these data sets is restricted by national regulations, but any researcher wishing to replicate our results can apply for access through these agencies. Since the study involves sensitive individual level data, getting access to the data also requires approval from an Ethics Board.