Abstract
Background In the first weeks of the COVID-19 epidemic in Belgium, a repetitive national serum collection was set up to monitor exposure through SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. Main objectives were to assess the evolving age-, sex and region specific seroprevalence and seroincidence under the influence of a national lock-down, which started on 17th March.
Methods This prospective serial cross-sectional nationwide seroprevalence study, stratified by age, sex and region, contains 3000-4000 samples in each of its five collection periods (March 30th – July 5th 2020). In residual sera taken outside hospitals and collected by diagnostic laboratories, IgG antibodies against S1 proteins of SARS-CoV-2 were measured with a semi-quantitative commercial ELISA. Seropositivity (cumulative, by age category and sex) and seroincidence over 3 to 4 week periods were estimated for the Belgian population.
Findings The weighted overall seroprevalence initially increased from 2·9% (95% CI 2·3 to 3·6) to 6·0% (95% CI 5·1 to 7·1), implying a seroincidence of 3·1% (95% CI 1·9 to 4·3) between the 1st and 2nd collection period. Thereafter, seroprevalence stabilized and decreased from the 3rd to 5th period from 6·9% (95% CI 5·9 to 8·0) to 4·5% (95% CI 3·7 to 5·4).
Interpretation During lockdown, a small but increasing fraction of the Belgian population showed serologically detectable signs of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The decrease observed afterwards most probably reflects rapid waning of IgG antibodies.
Funding Antwerp University Fund, the Flemish Research Fund, and European Horizon 2020.
Evidence before this study From 11 March to 6 July, updates on the COVID-19 pandemic by the World Health Organisation as well as bulletins from the Belgian Scientific Institute for Public Health, Sciensano, were consulted daily. Press releases and research reports from all over the world were monitored. Google, PubMed, medrxiv, bioRxiv were consulted for peer-reviewed articles and preprints by searching the terms “seroprevalence SARS-CoV-2” and “COVID-19”. We identified an increasing number of serosurveys during the course of this study, the majority of which as yet unpublished in peer-reviewed journals. Only one nationwide peer-reviewed serosurvey was published on July 6, indicating a seroprevalence of 5·0% in Spain in the period of 27 April – 11 May 2020 (n=61075). Other peer-reviewed studies assessed seroprevalences in specific subgroups of the population (cities). More large-scale, nationwide studies are needed to assess the proportion of the population that has recently been in contact with the virus, which helps to understand the likelihood of asymptomatic infections or infections with mild symptoms.
Added value of this study This study presents nationwide seropositivity in the Belgian population using serial serological survey data from five collection periods (March 30th - July 5th 2020) allowing to monitor acquisition of infections over three months time. The study period covers a lock-down mitigating the start of the epidemic as well as a period of release in a densely populated European country (374 persons/km2). Initial weighted overall seroprevalence was higher than expected from reported cases, and increasing quickly from 2·9% (95% CI 2·3 to 3·6) to 6·0% (95% CI 5·1 to 7·1) over 3 weeks during lockdown (from 1st to 2nd collection). The associated seroincidence was estimated at 3·1% (95% CI 1·9 to 4·3). The seroprevalence stabilized at 6·9% (95% CI 5·9-8·0) in the third collection period, and subsequently tended to decline to 5·5% (95% CI 4·7-6·5) and 4·5% (95% CI 3·7-5·4). A decrease is observed comparing the 3rd and 5th period with a seroincidence of −2·4% (95% CI −1·0 to −3·7) suggesting fast waning of IgG antibodies. Also age- and sex-specific analyses were conducted.
Implications of all the available evidence Seroprevalence studies around the world indicate that up to July 2020 a minor fraction of the population has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (e.g. in Spain 5% in May). As antibody titers after mild infection seem to wane rapidly, seroprevalence estimates might only indicate exposure in the previous 2-3 months. Nevertheless, periodic monitoring of seroprevalence is valuable to understand age and location specific rapid rises in the force of infection, to control the epidemic, and to avoid a deconfinement strategy leading to large future waves. The significance of detecting SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune responses, irrespective of cellular immune responses, is currently unknown. However, if seropositivity correlates to some extent with immunity the low peak levels of seropositivity observed during this study and their rapid decline suggest that mass vaccination programmes are essential to build up sufficient population immunity.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form available at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from research grants from GSK Biologicals, Pfizer, SANOFI, Merck, Themis, Osivax, J&J and Abbott and grants from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, Flemish Government and European Union, outside the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
This work received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program project EpiPose (No 101003688), the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement 682540 TransMID), the Flemish Research Fund (FWO 1150017N) and from The Antwerp University Fund; which is a community of donors who contribute to research and education with their personal commitment through a donation, gift, bequest or through academic chairs. We acknowledge the Belgian laboratories that voluntarily collected sera and data for this study: Algemeen Medisch Laboratorium (AML, Antwerpen), Laboratoire Luc OLIVIER (Fernelmont), Declerck Klinisch Laboratorium (Ardooie), Klinisch Labo RIGO (Genk), Labo Anacura/Nuytinck (Evergem), Labo Somedi (Heist-op-den-Berg), Labo LBS (Brussels), Laboratoire Bauduin (Enghien), Medisch labo Bruyland (Kortrijk), Synlab (Luik).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Antwerp-University of Antwerp on March 30, 2020 (ref 20/13/158; Belgian Number B3002020000047) and agreed with inclusion without informed consent, on the condition of the samples being collected unlinked and anonymously.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript updated to include results of all five collection periods.
Data Availability
The authors are willing to share original data on request.
