Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on HPV Dynamics in Adolescent Girls and Young Women: Insights from a Randomized Controlled Sub-Study in South Africa ====================================================================================================================================================== * Ramla F. Tanko * Ongeziwe Taku * Zizipho Z. A. Mbulawa * Keletso Phohlo * Iyaloo Konstantinus * Christina Balle * Tanya Pidwell * Anna-Ursula Happel * Katherine Gill * Linda-Gail Bekker * Heather B. Jaspan * Anna-Lise Williamson * Jo-Ann S. Passmore ## ABSTRACT **Objectives** Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer, with adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa carrying a disproportionately high burden of infection. Hormonal contraceptives may influence HPV acquisition, persistence, and clearance, but evidence remains inconclusive. This sub-study aimed to evaluate the impact of different hormonal contraceptives on HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in AGYW. **Methods** Ninety-eight HIV-seronegative AGYW aged 15–19 years from South Africa were randomized to receive one of three hormonal contraceptive methods: norethisterone enanthate (Net-EN) injectable, combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs), or the etonorgesterol/ethinyl estradiol combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR). Cervical DNA samples were collected at baseline and after 16 weeks for HPV genotyping using the HPV Direct Flow Chip test. HPV prevalence, persistence, clearance, and acquisition were analyzed across contraceptive methods. **Results** At baseline, HPV prevalence was high (94.9%), with no differences among contraceptive arms. After 16 weeks, HPV prevalence remained high (89.5%) across groups. No significant differences were observed in overall HPV prevalence or genotype distribution by contraceptive method. Longitudinal analysis revealed that AGYW using Net-EN tended to have a higher cumulative number of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotypes that cleared whereas those using CCVR acquired more HR-HPV types and had greater HR-HPV persistence compared to other groups. **Conclusions** This study highlights the high burden of HPV among South African AGYW. However, different hormonal contraceptive methods did not significantly influence HR-HPV dynamics. Keywords * Human papillomavirus * HPV * adolescents * persistence * contraceptives * Net-EN * COCPs * CCVR ## INTRODUCTION Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) affecting the human genital tract (1). Of the over 200 identified HPV types, only certain mucosal types are classified as high-risk (HR) due to their strong association with cancers (2,3). HPV-16 and HPV-18 are responsible for ∼70% of cervical cancer cases globally and contribute significantly to other HPV-related malignancies, including anal, vaginal, vulvar, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers. Cervical cancer remains particularly widespread in sub-Saharan Africa, where incidence rates surpass those of other regions (4,5). Risk of HPV infection is likely to be influenced by a combination of environmental, biological, and behavioral factors. Biologically, an impaired immune system, such as in individuals with HIV/AIDS, increases susceptibility to persistent HPV infections, while genetic predispositions (6) and co-infections with other STIs further elevate the risk (7). Key behavioral factors include early sexual debut, unprotected sex, multiple sexual partners, smoking, and prolonged use of hormonal contraceptives—all of which are associated with heightened risks of infection and cervical cancer (8). Understanding these complex factors is essential for developing targeted prevention and intervention strategies. Observational studies have suggested that hormonal contraceptives may influence HPV dynamics (9–11). For instance, combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs) have been associated with reduced HPV clearance, though other studies found no effect except with extended exposure. Meta-analyses suggest prolonged hormonal contraceptive use is linked to invasive cervical cancer (12,13), yet evidence on its relationship with HPV detection remains inconclusive. Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in South Africa carry a high burden of HPV infection (14). Many of these AGYW are within their first year of sexual debut, with a median of one lifetime sexual partner (15), underscoring the alarming overlap between high HPV prevalence and vaccine coverage gaps. This study investigated HPV prevalence and genotype distribution at baseline and after 16 weeks of hormonal contraceptive use in AGYW randomized to receive norethisterone enanthate (Net-EN), etonorgesterol/ethinyl estradiol combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR), or COCPs. Importantly, data on HPV infection and CCVR use are limited. Understanding the impact of hormonal contraceptives on HPV dynamics is critical for guiding effective vaccination and reproductive health strategies. ## METHODS AND MATERIALS ### Description of study cohort Between September 2015 and July 2017, 130 AGYW between the ages of 15 and 19 were recruited from the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation Youth Centre in Cape Town into an open-label, randomized crossover study evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and adherence to contraceptive choices (uChoose study; [clinicaltrials.gov](https://clinicaltrials.gov) number [NCT02404038](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02404038&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom)) (15). Eligible participants were HIV-seronegative, sexually active, not pregnant, had no symptomatic STIs that required antibiotic treatment in the 40 days prior to enrolment, and agreed not to use non-study vaginal products for the duration of the study. Following screening (baseline visit), eligible AGYW were randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of three hormonal contraceptives: NET-EN (200 mg), COCPs (Triphasil® or Nordette®; both containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel), or CCVR (Nuvaring®; etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) for 16 weeks. AGYW who were <18 years provided written assent, and informed consent was obtained from their parents or legal guardians. AGYW who were ≥18 years old provided written informed consent. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committees (UCT HREC 801/2014). ### Testing for bacterial STIs and Bacterial vaginosis (BV) At the time of sampling, vulvovaginal swabs were screened for *Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium* using a real-time multiplex PCR (16). BV was diagnosed using Nugent scoring, with Nugent Scores of 7-10 indicating a BV positive result (17). Vaginal pH levels were measured using color-fixed indicator strips (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Participants who tested positive for STIs and/or BV received treatment according to the South African National guidelines. ### HPV genotyping HPV genotyping was performed at baseline and after 16 weeks on extracted DNA (MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit; Roche), from endocervical swabs collected during the speculum examination, using the HPV Direct Flow Chip test (Master Diagnóstica, Granada, Spain), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The Direct Flow Chip detects 36 different HPV genotypes, including the 12 HR types according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (3) (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59), an additional 5 HPV types previously considered HR (26, 53, 66, 73, 82; according to the kit manufacturers), and 18 low-risk (LR) types (6, 11, 40, 42, 43, 44, 54, 55, 61, 62, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 81, 84, 89). For the purposes of HR-HPV analysis, the recent IARC (3) definition of HR-HPV types was used. For the purposes of LR-HPV analysis, the manufacturers definition of LR-HPV types was used. A sample was considered HPV positive when at least one HPV genotype was detected. Specimens testing positive for 2 or more HPV genotypes were considered to have multiple infections. Acquiring a new HPV infection was defined as detection of any HPV type at 16 weeks in AGYW who did not have that HPV type present at baseline. HPV persistence was defined as having the same HPV genotype detected at both baseline and 16 weeks, in the same participant. HPV clearance was defined as women testing negative for any HPV genotype at 16 weeks that was present at baseline. ### Statistical analyses Fisher’s exact test and descriptive statistics were used to compare differences between hormonal contraceptive arms for categorical variables. Continuous variables were described using median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Kruskal Wallis-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, USA). ## RESULTS Of the 130 AGYW enrolled into the parent uChoose study, endocervical samples were available for HPV genotyping from 98 women at baseline (74.5%) and 95 at 16 weeks (73.1%; **Supplementary Figure 1**). This included 36 matched sample pairs (baseline and 16 weeks) from adolescents randomized to receive Net-EN, 25 matched samples from AGYW randomized to receive COCPs, and 26 who were randomized to receive the CCVR. ![Supplemental Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F3.medium.gif) [Supplemental Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F3) Supplemental Figure 1. Study design overview Study design for the open-label, randomized crossover trial conducted among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Participants were randomized to one of three hormonal contraceptive methods: combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs), injectable Net-EN, or combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR). Each participant used their assigned contraceptive method for 16 weeks before crossing over to another method, with no washout period between interventions. The primary outcomes were acceptability, feasibility, and adherence. Assessments were conducted at baseline, and 16 weeks. The crossover design allowed each participant to serve as their own control, enabling robust comparisons between the different contraceptive methods. Demographics, genital infections, sexual risk behaviors, prior hormonal contraceptive use, and endogenous hormone levels did not significantly differ among hormonal contraceptive methods at baseline (**Table 1**). At baseline, HPV prevalence was high, with an overall prevalence of 94.9% (93/98), which did not differ between randomization arms (**Figure 1 and Table 2**). Most (80.5%) AGYW had multiple infections with HPV. Baseline prevalence of any HR-HPV was 78.9%. HPV-16 and HPV-18 were detected in 6/98 (6.1%) and 14/98 (14.2%) AGYW, respectively, with HPV-31 and HPV-39 being the most commonly detected HR type (both 18/98; 18.4%) (**Figure 2A**). While South Africa initiated the Cervarix (HPV-16/18) vaccination program a year before recruitment for uChoose began (19), which targeted grade 4 learners (aged 9 years or older), the AGYW enrolled in this study were unlikely to have been vaccinated as no catch-up vaccines were offered. The 9-valent Merck HPV vaccine would improve coverage although this does not contain other common HR-HPV types found in this cohort (HPV-39, HPV-56 [16/98; %], HPV-59 [14/98; 14.2%]; **Figure 2A**). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F1) Figure 1. Dynamics of HPV Infections Across Contraceptive Methods. This figure illustrates the percentage of AGYW with cleared, persistent, and newly acquired HPV infections, based on paired data between baseline and week 16 visits. Results are stratified by hormonal contraceptive methods: CCVR (n=26), COCPs (n=25), and Net-EN (n=36). Color coding reflects infection categories: pink for any HPV, orange for HR HPV, darker blue for LR-HPV, and lighter blue for multiple HPVs. ![](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F2/graphic-2.medium.gif) [](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F2/graphic-2) ![](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F2/graphic-3.medium.gif) [](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/F2/graphic-3) Figure 2. HPV Genotype Distribution Across Contraceptive Arms. (A) Distribution of HPV genotypes among AGYW at baseline and 16 weeks. Each bar graph represents the prevalence of a specific HPV genotype. Light colors indicate low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) types, while dark colors represent HR-HPV types. Genotypes no longer considered by IARC (3) to be HR are shown in green italics. Genotypes targeted by the bivalent (HPV 16, 18), quadrivalent (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18), and nonavalent (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) vaccines are highlighted in bold. (B) Stacked bars show the prevalence of HR HPV types (including HPV-66 and −68 which were previously classified as HR) that were newly acquired between 0 and 16 weeks (left panel), cleared (middle panel), or persisted (right panel), stratified by genotype and contraceptive method. Panels represent data for Net-EN (n=36), COCPs (n=25), and CCVR (n=26), based on paired samples between baseline and week 16 visits. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/T1) Table 1. Baseline characteristics of AGYW in UChoose HPV sub-study View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/15/2025.01.14.25320519/T2) Table 2. HPV prevalence at baseline and 16 week visits for paired samples At 16 weeks, the HPV prevalence remained high (89.5%). Overall HPV prevalence and HR-HPV prevalence did not differ significantly by study arm (**Figure 1 and Table 2**). AGYW randomized to the Net-EN arm had an HPV prevalence (any) of 86.1% at 16 weeks compared to 97.2% at baseline (31/36 vs 35/36, p=0.2), those using COCPs had the same HPV prevalence at baseline and 16 weeks (both 88.0% [22/25]; p=1.0), and those randomized to the CCVR group had an HPV prevalence of 96.2% at 16 weeks compared to 92.3% at baseline (25/26 vs 24/26; p=1.0). For HR-HPV types, 66.7% of women randomized to Net-EN had a HR-HPV type at 16 weeks compared to 80.6% at baseline (24/36 vs 29/36, p=0.3), 56.0% of those using COCPs had HR-HPV infections at week 16 compared to 72.0% at baseline (14/25 vs 18/25; p=0.4), and those randomized to the CCVR group had an HPV prevalence of 76.9% at 16 weeks compared to 80.8% at baseline (20/26 vs 21/26; p=1.0). Longitudinal analyses of HR-HPV genotype distribution showed no significant differences between the hormonal contraceptive arms, whether considering women who cleared infections (by type), had persistent infections (same type), or acquired new HPV genotype infections (by type; **Figure 2B**). However, there tended to be higher combined prevalence of new HR-HPV types acquired and that persisted in the CCVR arm compared to the other contraceptives arms. In contrast, adolescents in the Net-EN arm tended to have higher combined prevalence of HR-HPV counts cleared during the study than the other two arms. ## DISCUSSION This sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (15) compared HPV prevalence and genotype distribution among AGYW randomized to three common hormonal contraceptives: CCVR, the injectable Net-EN, and COCPs. Our results revealed high HPV prevalence across all contraceptive methods at baseline, with no significant differences in overall prevalence or genotype distribution linked to any specific contraceptive arm after 16 weeks of use. Longitudinal analyses showed some variations in HR-HPV dynamics over the 16-week study period, although these were not significant. AGYW using Net-EN tended to clear more HR-HPV types, whereas those using the CCVR tended to acquire more HR-HPV infections that persisted compared to those in the other contraceptive arms. The high HPV prevalence observed in this cohort aligns with other studies indicating that AGYW are at significant risk of acquiring HPV infections shortly after sexual debut (20,21). This rapid increase, often within the first six months of sexual activity, is influenced by factors such as sexual behaviors, the number of sexual partners, and immune response (22). In this study, an early average age of sexual debut (13 years) and additional risk factors, such as inconsistent condom use (43.9%), multiple sexual partners (21.4%), and high rates of other STIs (e.g., *C. trachomatis* prevalence of 31.6%), likely contributed to the high HPV rates at baseline. We have previously shown that hormonal contraceptives exert distinct effects on the mucosal environment of the female genital tract, as evidenced by changes in microbial composition (23), inflammatory markers (24), and gene expression (25). In this cohort, adolescents randomized to Net-EN exhibited higher vaginal microbial diversity and proinflammatory taxa compared to those using COCPs, who had associated with increased lactobacilli and reduced genital inflammation (23,24). CCVR use, however, was linked to elevated transcriptional networks involving interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and NF-κB, suggesting increased genital tract inflammation, alongside reduced epithelial barrier integrity (25). As altered vaginal microbiota (26), reduced genital barrier integrity (27) and chronic inflammation (28) have all previously been associated with increased risk for HPV infection and carcinogenesis, this may explain our observation that AGYW using the CCVR might be more likely to acquire and retain HR-HPV infections compared to other contraceptive users. The findings suggest that hormonal contraceptives may differentially impact HR-HPV acquisition, persistence, and clearance. The observed benefits of Net-EN in clearing HR-HPV types and the increased acquisition and persistence associated with CCVR underscore the need to explore biological mechanisms underlying these effects. These insights are critical for tailoring contraceptive counseling and HPV prevention strategies, particularly in high-risk populations like AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Further research is essential to validate these findings and assess the long-term implications for cervical health and cancer prevention. ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ## 1. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Conceived and designed the experiments: J.A.P, R.F.T., H.J., A.L.W. Designed and recruited the study participants: L.G.B., K.G., T.P., and S.B. Processed samples: I.K., C.B., S.J., A.H., and H.G. Performed the experiments: T.F.M., K.P., O.T., and Z.Z.A.M. Analysed the data: R.F.T., and J.A.P. Wrote the manuscript: All authors. ## FUNDING This work was funded by the South African Medical Research Council and the US National Institute of Health (R01 HD083040 for this sub-study to [PIs: Heather Jaspan and Jo-Ann Passmore], and R01AI094586 for the parent study to Linda Gail-Bekker. Merck donated the CCVRs for the study. This HPV sub-study was funded by a grant from the Poliomyelitis Research Foundation to Dr Passmore, and a grant from NRF SARChi Chair to Prof Anna-Lise Williamson. ## CONFLICT OF INTEREST All authors declare no potential conflict of interest. ## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to all the uChoose study participants and protocol team: Ms Penelope Ngcobo for recruiting and consenting participants, Dr Eve Mendel the study clinician, Sister Janine Nixon the study nurse and Ms Keshani Naidoo for processing the samples, Ms Maria Mwakatima and Zoe Baker for editorial and review support. ## Footnotes * # **Co-last authors** * Received January 14, 2025. * Revision received January 14, 2025. * Accepted January 15, 2025. * © 2025, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license ## REFERENCES 1. 1.Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, et al. Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PloS one. 2015;10(12):e0143304. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0143304&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26646541&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 2. 2.Chan CK, Aimagambetova G, Ukybassova T, Kongrtay K, Azizan A. Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, and Vaccination-Review of Current Perspectives. J Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;2019:3257939. doi: 10.1155/2019/3257939. PMID: 31687023; PMCID: PMC6811952. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2019/3257939&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31687023&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 3. 3.Wei F, Georges D, Man I, Baussano I, Clifford GM (2024). Causal attribution of human papillomavirus genotypes to invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a systematic analysis of the global literature. Lancet. Published online 1 August 2024; doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01097-3. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01097-3&link_type=DOI) 4. 4.Jedy-Agba E, Joko WY, Liu B, Buziba NG, Borok M, Korir A, Masamba L, Manraj SS, Finesse A, Wabinga H, Somdyala N, Parkin DM. Trends in cervical cancer incidence in sub-Saharan Africa. Br J Cancer. 2020 Jul;123(1):148–154. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0831-9. Epub 2020 Apr 27. PMID: 32336751; PMCID: PMC7341858. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41416-020-0831-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 5. 5.Ramogola-Masire D, Luckett R, Dreyer G. Progress and challenges in human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in southern Africa. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2022;35(1):49–54. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34873079&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 6. 6.Adebamowo, S. N., et al. (2024). Genome, HLA and polygenic risk score analyses for prevalent and persistent cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/s41431-023-01521-7. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41431-023-01521-7&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Hewavisenti RV, Arena J, Ahlenstiel CL, Sasson SC. Human papillomavirus in the setting of immunodeficiency: Pathogenesis and the emergence of next-generation therapies to reduce the high associated cancer risk. Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 7;14:1112513. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112513. PMID: 36960048; PMCID: PMC10027931. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112513&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=36960048&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 8. 8.Pino M, Vorsters A, Joura EA, et al. Risk factors for human papillomavirus infection and disease: a targeted literature summary. J Med Virol. 2024; 96:e29420. doi:10.1002/jmv.29420 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/jmv.29420&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=38377121&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 9. 9.Marks M, Gravitt PE, Gupta SB, Liaw K-L, Tadesse A, Kim E, et al. Combined oral contraceptive use increases HPV persistence but not new HPV detection in a cohort of women from Thailand. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2011;204(10):1505–13. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/infdis/jir560&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21964399&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 10. 10.Marks M, Gravitt PE, Gupta SB, Liaw KL, Kim E, Tadesse A, et al. The association of hormonal contraceptive use and HPV prevalence. International journal of cancer. 2011;128(12):2962–70. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ijc.25628&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20734390&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 11. 11.Chong G, Bo Z, Meng-Yuan L, Li Y, Chao Z. Association between oral contraceptives and cervical cancer: A retrospective case–control study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2024. 15. DOI=10.3389/fphar.2024.1400667 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fphar.2024.1400667&link_type=DOI) 12. 12.Asthana S, Busa V, Labani S. Oral contraceptives use and risk of cervical cancer-A systematic review & meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Apr;247:163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Feb 21. PMID: 32114321. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.014&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32114321&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 13. 13.Damayanti, S., Budihastuti, U. R., & Murti, B. (2023). Meta-Analysis: Effects of Hormonal Contraceptive Use and History of Sexually Transmitted Disease on the Risk of Cervical Cancer. Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 8(6), 711–722. doi:10.26911/thejmch.2023.08.06.05 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.26911/thejmch.2023.08.06.05&link_type=DOI) 14. 14.Mbulawa ZZA, van Schalkwyk C, Hu NC, Meiring TL, Barnabas S, Dabee S, Jaspan H, Kriek JM, Jaumdally SZ, Muller E, Bekker LG, Lewis DA, Dietrich J, Gray G, Passmore JS, Williamson AL. High human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence in South African adolescents and young women encourages expanded HPV vaccination campaigns. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190166. PMID: 29293566; PMCID: PMC5749739. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0190166&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29293566&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 15. 15.Gill, K., Happel, A.U., Pidwell, T., Mendelsohn, A., Duyver, M., Johnson, L., Meyer, L., Slac k, C., Strode, A., Mendel, E., Fynn, L., Wallace, M., Spiegel, H., Jaspan, H., Passmore, J.-A., Hosek, S., Smit, D., Rinehart, A. and Bekker, L.-G. An open-label, randomized crossover study to evaluate the acceptability and preference for contraceptive options in female adolescents, 15 to 19 years of age in Cape Town, as a proxy for HIV prevention methods (UChoose). J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23(10):e25626 [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33034421&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 16. 16.Lewis DA, Müller E, Steele L, Sternberg M, Radebe F, Lyall M, et al. Prevalence and associations of genital ulcer and urethral pathogens in men presenting with genital ulcer syndrome to primary health care clinics in South Africa. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2012:880–5. 17. 17.Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1991;29(2):297–301. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI5LzIvMjk3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjUvMDEvMTUvMjAyNS4wMS4xNC4yNTMyMDUxOS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 18. 18.Herraez-Hernandez E, Alvarez-Perez M, Navarro-Bustos G, Esquivias J, Alonso S, Aneiros-Fernandez J, et al. HPV Direct Flow CHIP: A new human papillomavirus genotyping method based on direct PCR from crude-cell extracts. Journal of virological methods. 2013;193(1):9–17. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23680093&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 19. 19.Delany-Moretlwe, S., Kelley, K.F., James, S., Scorgie, F., Subedar, H., Dlamini, N.R., Pillay, Y., Naidoo, N., Chikandiwa, A. and Rees, H., 2018. Human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in South Africa: implementation lessons from an evaluation of the national school-based vaccination campaign. Global Health: Science and Practice, 6(3), pp.425–438. 20. 20.Houlihan CF, de Sanjosé S, Baisley K, Changalucha J, Ross DA, Kapiga S, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in adolescent girls before reported sexual debut. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014;210(6):837–45. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/infdis/jiu202&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24740630&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 21. 21.Smith JS. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in adolescent girls before reported sexual debut. Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 835–6. 22. 22.Marks MA, Klein SL, Gravitt PE. Hormonal contraception and HPV: a tale of differing and overlapping mechanisms. Open Access Journal of Contraception. 2011:161–74. 23. 23.Balle, C., Konstantinus, I.N., Jaumdally, S.Z. et al. Hormonal contraception alters vaginal microbiota and cytokines in South African adolescents in a randomized trial. Nat Commun 11, 5578 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19382-9. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-020-19382-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33149114&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 24. 24.Konstantinus IN, Balle C, Jaumdally SZ, Galmieldien H, Pidwell T, Masson L, Tanko RF, Happel AU, Sinkala M, Myer L, Bosinger SE, Gill K, Bekker LG, Jaspan HB, Passmore JS. Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on Cervical T-helper 17 Phenotype and Function in Adolescents: Results from a Randomized, Crossover Study Comparing Long-acting Injectable Norethisterone Oenanthate (NET-EN), Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills, and Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Rings. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):e76–e87. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1063. PMID: 31675420; PMCID: PMC7755094. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciz1063&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31675420&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 25. 25.Balle C, Gupta PM, Tharp GK, Nelson SA, Konstantinus I, Lennard K, Jaumdally SZ, Happel AU, Barnabas SL, Gill K, Bekker LG, Passmore JS, Jaspan HB, Bosinger SE. Systems Analysis Reveals Contraceptive-Induced Alteration of Cervicovaginal Gene Expression in a Randomized Trial. Frontiers in Reproductive Health, 2022. 4, DOI=10.3389/frph.2022.781687 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/frph.2022.781687&link_type=DOI) 26. 26.Lin, W., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y. et al. Changes of the vaginal microbiota in HPV infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cross-sectional analysis. Sci Rep 12, 2812 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06731-5 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-022-06731-5&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35181685&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 27. 27.Qulu W, Mtshali A, Osman F, Ndlela N, Ntuli L, Mzobe G, Naicker N, Garrett N, Rompalo A, Mindel A, Ngcapu S, Liebenberg L. High-risk human papillomavirus prevalence among South African women diagnosed with other STIs and BV. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294698. PMID: 38032961; PMCID: PMC10688634. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0294698&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=38032961&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom) 28. 28.Fernandes JV, DE Medeiros, Fernandes TA, DE Azevedo JC, Cobucci RN, DE Carvalho MG, Andrade VS, DE Araújo JM. Link between chronic inflammation and human papillomavirus-induced carcinogenesis. Oncol Lett. 2015 Mar;9(3):1015–1026. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2884. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PMID: 25663851; PMCID: PMC4315066. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3892/ol.2015.2884&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25663851&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2025%2F01%2F15%2F2025.01.14.25320519.atom)