Abstract
Background Few studies examine suicidal ideation and its relationship with suicide attempts and health service use using a community sample.
Objective To examine the association between suicidal ideation with (i) future mental health service use, and (ii) future suicide attempts, in a general population sample.
Methods Using the 2002 and 2012 Canadian Community Health Surveys – Mental Health cycles linked with health administrative data, this study followed 14,708 Ontarians 15 years and older in a retrospective cohort study to examine patterns of mental health service use within 1 year, and suicide attempts within 5 years of self-reported suicidal ideation.
Results A total of 2.1% (n=302) of all survey respondents reported suicidal ideation alone in the past year and another 0.5% (n=76) reported having ideation-with-action (i.e. ideation with planning or previous suicide attempt). Ideation-with-action was associated with a higher likelihood of future suicide attempts and future mental health service use, when compared to suicidal ideation alone. However, the majority of survey respondents who attempted suicide within the five-year follow-up period did not report a previous attempt or ideation at baseline.
Conclusion While suicidal ideation is statistically significantly associated with greater likelihood of suicide attempt within five years, most attempters did not self-report ideation at baseline. Further study is needed to measure suicidal outcomes longitudinally to allow for dynamic expression of suicidal ideation as outcomes such as suicide attempts are measured.
Those with ideation-with-action are more intense users of mental health services than those with ideation alone, indicating that care is reaching the more severe ideators.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos