Abstract
Background Patients who undertake endoscopic stone removal had a chance to have CBDS recurrence, which can lead to many severe complication. Many risk factors cause the recurrence of CBDS, but many factors cannot be controlled by clinical intervention. As for the patients in daily life, healthy lifestyle is important to prevent the recurrence of CBDS. The questionnaire of KAP can collect the real information about patients and guide the clinical work.
Methods 100 CBDS recurrence patients after surgery in our hospital were enrolled. A pair of self-designed questionnaires on KAP were used to collect data and assess the KAP towards CBDS recurrence.
Results The mean score for KAP of CBDS recurrence patients was 30.29±2.87, 26.42±±3.53 and 27.23±±3.48. Pearson correlation analysis showed that knowledge aspect score and attitude score were significantly positively correlated with practice score (r=0.384, 0.309; P<0.001, 0.002). Further Pearson regression analysis revealed that the knowledge and attitude, education, Type 2 diabetes, were significantly associated with the practice of patients.
Conclusion The CBDS recurrence patients had a good command of knowledge, but had negative attitude and poor performance in practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research Ethics Committee of Jinan Central Hospital
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos