Association of healthcare fragmentation and overall survival in patients with kidney transplant in Colombia =========================================================================================================== * Luis Manuel Barrera * Daniela Sánchez-Santiesteban * Giancarlo Buitrago ## ABSTRACT **Objective** Kidney transplantation requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes. Healthcare fragmentation can negatively impact clinical outcomes; however, this issue remains understudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to assess healthcare fragmentation in kidney transplant patients during their first post-transplant year and evaluate its association with three-year survival among patients enrolled in Colombia’s contributory healthcare scheme. **Methods** A retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data from Colombia’s contributory healthcare scheme. The cohort included kidney transplant recipients (2012–2016) who survived the first post-transplant year. Healthcare fragmentation was measured by the number of unique providers involved in the first year. Patients were categorised into high- and low-fragmentation groups based on the 75th percentile of provider distribution. The primary outcome was three-year survival, analysed using multivariate Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), insurer, region, and transplant year. **Results** The cohort comprised 2,028 kidney transplant patients, with a mean age of 47.7 years (SD: 13.4), 38.7% female, and 68.7% presenting a CCI≤3. Healthcare fragmentation ranged from 1 to 34 providers, with a mean of 8.94 (SD: 6.77). High fragmentation (≥11 providers) was observed in 30.2% of patients. Three-year mortality was significantly higher in the high-fragmentation group (18%) compared to the low-fragmentation group (12%) (p=0.04). High fragmentation was associated with a 49% increased mortality risk (adjusted HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12–1.97; p=0.01). **Conclusion** Healthcare fragmentation significantly reduces three-year overall survival in kidney transplant recipients in Colombia. These findings underscore the importance of integrated care models and improved coordination among providers to enhance patient outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings. ## INTRODUCTION Kidney transplantation is recognised as the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, significantly improving survival rates and quality of life compared to long-term dialysis [1,2]. Despite its clinical benefits, the success of renal transplantation depends heavily on comprehensive, multidisciplinary care that addresses various challenges, including immunosuppressive therapy, management of comorbid conditions, and the prevention and early detection of complications [3–5]. Coordinated care is critical in ensuring optimal outcomes, as patients require regular follow-ups, monitoring by specialised teams, and laboratory by healthcare providers [5]. However, fragmentation within healthcare systems, defined by inadequate communication and lack of integration among providers, disrupts this continuum of care, leading to adverse clinical outcomes [6–9]. In kidney transplantation, for example, fragmentation can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment, duplication of medical services, increased costs, and worse health outcomes, ultimately compromising the potential benefits of transplantation [10,11]. Due to their fragmented health systems, Latin American countries face significant challenges in delivering integrated healthcare. In Colombia, fragmentation manifests both horizontally, through a lack of coordination between providers at the same level of care, and vertically [12]. This fragmentation is further exacerbated in Colombia by the decentralised structure of the healthcare system, which disperses responsibility across multiple actors, including public and private providers, insurers, and regional authorities. For complex medical procedures like kidney transplantation, the consequences of fragmentation are particularly severe as they encounter obstacles such as inconsistent follow-up, limited access to necessary medications, and insufficient communication between transplant centres and other providers. These challenges not only hinder recovery but also increase the likelihood of complications, hospital readmissions, and preventable mortality. Healthcare fragmentation has been studied in chronic conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases [13–17]; however, kidney transplantation, which requires a similarly high level of care integration, remains understudied. To our knowledge, no studies have specifically evaluated the association between healthcare fragmentation and survival outcomes in renal transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This gap in the literature underscores the need for targeted research to understand better how fragmented care influences transplant success, particularly in the Colombian context, where fragmentation challenges are pronounced. This study aims to address this gap by assessing the extent of care fragmentation experienced by renal transplant patients during the critical first year following transplantation and evaluating its association with three-year overall survival. By analysing data from a large national cohort, this research seeks to provide evidence of the association of healthcare fragmentation on clinical outcomes. The findings can potentially inform health policies and interventions to reduce care fragmentation, improve coordination among healthcare providers, and optimise resource use in this population. Ultimately, the study highlights the importance of integrated care models in enhancing renal transplant patients’ survival and quality of life, particularly in resource-limited and fragmented healthcare systems like Colombia. ## METHODS ### Study Design and Population This retrospective cohort study was conducted based on administrative data of adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2012 and 2016 and were enrolled in the contributory health insurance system. The cohort was constructed using the Base for the Study of Capitation Unit Sufficiency (UPC) to identify all adult patients with a kidney transplantation record [18]. All subjects included in the study had to survive the first-year post-transplant to allow for the measurement of fragmentation during this period. After this initial year, each subject was followed for up to three years or until death, whichever occurred first. We used the Mortality Registry Module from the Unified Affiliation Registry (RUAF) to determine the mortality date [19]. This study utilised two primary administrative databases, anonymised and linked, using unique identifiers by the Ministry of Health (MoH). The UPC database is highly standardised and is the primary source of information used by the Ministry of Health (MoH) for the annual estimation of the UPC in the healthcare system. The database includes detailed information on each utilised service, such as the Unified Health Procedure Code (CUPS), an ICD-10 code associated with the service, the service date, the cost paid by each insurer to each provider, the patient’s sex, the insurer to which the patient is affiliated, the city where the service was provided, the provider’s registration code, and an anonymised individual identifier for each affiliate. Additionally, the RUAF Mortality Registry Module contains information from death certificates for all Colombians, including the date of death and diagnosis. International assessments have confirmed the reliability of RUAF data, with 91% of deaths registered through death certificates as of 2016 [20]. These databases were provided to the Clinical Research Institute at the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia by the Office of Information Technologies of MoH for research purposes. This study was approved by the Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Approval Number: 004-029). ### Exposure, Outcome, and Control Variables As mentioned, all included patients survived the first-year post-transplantation as an inclusion criterion. To measure healthcare fragmentation, we counted the number of different healthcare providers involved in the patient’s care during the first year of post-transplantation. This number was the primary exposure variable and has been used in similar studies [13–16,21]. After the first year of survival, all patients were followed for an additional three years. Using information from the RUAF database, the three-year survival time was estimated, corresponding to the study’s primary outcome variable. Control variables included age, sex, comorbidities measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [22], insurer, geographic region, and year of transplantation. ### Analysis Baseline characteristics of the cohort were described using measures of central tendency and dispersion for continuous variables and relative and absolute frequencies for categorical variables. The quartiles of the primary exposure variable (i.e., the number of different providers in the first-year post-transplantation) were identified. The cohort was divided into high fragmentation (those exposed to a number of providers greater than or equal to the 75th percentile of the distribution) and low fragmentation (those exposed to a number of providers below the 75th percentile). An analysis of the crude three-year mortality proportion and unadjusted survival was performed. Using a multivariate Cox regression model, the hazard ratio (HR) of being exposed to highly fragmented healthcare compared to low-fragmentation healthcare was estimated, controlling for the previously mentioned covariables. The proportionality assumption was evaluated with graphical and statistical tests using Schoenfeld residuals. All estimators were presented with 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were conducted using Stata 17 MP (licensed to the Universidad Nacional de Colombia). This article followed the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines to ensure transparency and thoroughness in reporting the findings. ## RESULTS Between 2012 and 2016, a total of 3,999 patients underwent kidney transplantation. After excluding 47 patients under 18 years old and 1,924 patients who died within the first year, 2,028 patients were eligible for the study. No records were lost in the follow-up as each of the 2,028 participants was followed for three years or until death, whichever occurred first. The flowchart in Figure 1 provides additional details on the selection process. ![Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/F1.medium.gif) [Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/F1) Fig 1. STROBE flow chart. UPC: Base for the Study of Capitation Unit Sufficiency Database. Table 1 presents detailed sociodemographic, clinical and exposure characteristics of the cohort. Of the total cohort, 785 patients (38.7%) were women, and the mean age was 47.7 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 13.4 years). A total of 1,394 patients (68.7%) had a CCI of 3 or less. Bogotá was the region with the highest number of transplants, with a total of 923 (45.5%), and a decline in the number of transplants per year was observed (see Table 1). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/T1) Table 1. Description of cohort baseline characteristics The degree of healthcare fragmentation, measured as the number of distinct providers involved in a patient’s care during the first year post-transplant, ranged from 1 to 34, with a mean of 8.94 (SD: 6.77). The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were 6, 8, and 11 providers, respectively. Among the regions analysed, the Central region exhibited the highest mean fragmentation, with an average of 10.78 providers (SD: 4.65), while the Pacific region showed the lowest, with an average of 7.96 providers (SD: 3.73) (Table 2). At the departmental level, the highest fragmentation was observed in Sucre (14.00; SD: 5.10), La Guajira (12.13; SD: 5.67), and Caquetá (13.60; SD: 5.19). Conversely, the lowest fragmentation was found in Nariño (6.33; SD: 2.65) and Arauca (6.50; SD: 2.12). Figure 2 illustrates the geographic distribution of healthcare fragmentation across Colombia, highlighting significant regional variability. ![Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/F2.medium.gif) [Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/F2) Fig 2. Geographical distribution of healthcare fragmentation. Geographic distribution of exposure to healthcare fragmentation measured as number of different HCPIs in the first year of care after kidney transplantation in adults belonging to the contributory regimen in Colombia. Abbreviations: HCPIs: Healthcare Provider Institutions. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.12.24318934/T2) Table 2. Healthcare Fragmentation by Geographic Regions in Colombia according to the number of different providers involved during the first year of post-transplant healthcare attention Patients were categorised into two groups: high fragmentation, comprising those who consulted 11 or more providers (≥p75), and low fragmentation, comprising those who consulted ten or fewer providers (