ABSTRACT
Purpose To investigate the real-world adverse event signals associated with zonisamide and provide a foundation for its safe clinical use.
Methods Adverse event reports involving zonisamide as the primary suspected drug were collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The data were analyzed utilizing the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) methods of the proportional imbalance technique.
Results A total of 3205 adverse event reports involving zonisamide as the primary suspected drug were identified, resulting in 260 positive signals for preferred terms (PTs). These signals, derived from both the ROR and BCPNN methods, encompassed 27 systems and organs (SOCs), with a predominant focus on nervous system disorders and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. The most frequently reported PTs included seizures, drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, rash, and dizziness. Notably, the top PTs in terms of signal intensity included perinephritis, epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic, ocular mucocutaneous syndrome, ocular choroidal leakage, tonsillar exudate, and ovarian granulosa vesicular cell tumor. Interestingly, ten of the top 30 risk signals for adverse events, based on signal strength, were not detailed in the package inserts. Thses included perinephritis, myoclonic dystonic epilepsy, ovarian granulosa vesicular cell tumor, positive human herpesvirus 6 serology, and positive lymphocyte stimulation test.
Conclusion Common adverse reactions to zonisamide in real-world settings are generally in line with the established specification, with the most frequently observer signals related to neurological, skin, and subcutaneous tissue disorders. However, several newly suspected adverse reactions have been identified, including perinephritis, infectious pneumonitis, ovarian granulosa vesicular cell tumor, positive serology for human herpesvirus 6, and positive lymphocyte stimulation test. These findings indicate that these potential adverse reactions should be closely monitored in clinical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Science Fund Project (Grant numbers: 81901324)
Ethics approval Anonymized data were collected from a publicly available database and do not require approval from the ethics committee.
Availability of data and material Data are available on the FAERS database. Analytical datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.