ABSTRACT
Despite advances in diagnostic testing and genome sequencing, the majority of individuals with rare genetic disorders remain undiagnosed. As a complement to genome sequencing, transcriptional profiling can provide insight into the functional consequences of DNA variants on RNA transcript expression and structure. Here we assessed the utility of blood derived RNA-seq in a well-studied, but still mostly undiagnosed, cohort of individuals who enrolled in the SickKids Genome Clinic study. This cohort was established to benchmark the ability of genome sequencing technologies to diagnose genetic diseases and has been subjected to multiple analyses. We used RNA-seq to profile whole blood RNA expression from all probands for whom a blood sample was available (n=134). Our RNA-centric analysis included differential gene expression, alternative splicing, and allele specific expression. In one third of the diagnosed individuals (20/61), RNA-seq provided additional evidence supporting the pathogenicity of the variant found by prior DNA-based analyses. In 2/61 cases, RNA-seq changed the GS-derived genetic diagnosis (EPG5 to LZTR1 in an individual with a Noonan syndrome-like disorder) and discovered an additional relevant gene (CEP120 in addition to SON in an individual with ZTTK syndrome). In ∼7% (5/73) of the undiagnosed participants, RNA-seq provided at least one plausible, potentially diagnostic candidate gene. This study illustrates the benefits and limitations of using whole-blood RNA profiling to support existing molecular diagnoses and reveal candidate molecular mechanisms underlying undiagnosed genetic disease.
Competing Interest Statement
MBrudno and DJS have equity in PhenoTips
Funding Statement
Funding was provided by Genome Canada (OGI-158 to MB, AS, JJD, MDW).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at The Hospital for Sick Children. Informed written consent was obtained for each participant (REB number: 1000037726)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.