Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women in Mozambique. Women living with HIV (WLHIV) have a six times greater risk of developing cervical cancer. National guidelines call for annual screening of all HIV-positive women aged 20-49 years or below 20 years if she is sexually active and HIV-negative women aged 25-49 years, with follow-up after 1 year for HIV-positive and 3 years for HIV-negative women that screen negative. Women screened positive are referred to treatment with cryotherapy, thermal ablation, or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). In 2021, HIV prevalence among women aged 15–49 years was estimated at 15.4%. We analyzed routine program data to describe the expansion of cervical cancer services and identify gaps in screening and treatment coverage among WLHIV since 2018.
Methods We analyzed semi-annual, routinely collected programmatic data on cervical cancer screening and treatment services reported between 21 September 2018 to 20 March 2019 (585 sites reported) and 21 March to 20 September 2023 (610 sites reported). We verify rates of screening coverage (WLHIV screened divided by WLHIV on ART aged ≥15 years), screen positivity (WLHIV screened positive divided by number screened), and treatment (WLHIV treated for precancerous lesions divided by number screened positive).
Results The screening coverage improved from 1.4% (10,596 screened/731,572 WLHIV on ART) in October 2018–March 2019 to 36.2% (395,609/1,094,033) in March–September 2023. In the same period, screen positivity rates increased from 8.1% (861/10,596) to 10.9% (43,290/395,614), and treatment rates increased from 59.9% (516/861) to 94.0% (40,677/43,290).
Conclusion Access to cervical cancer services has improved dramatically for a large population of WLHIV. With increased screening, more WLHIV with pre-cancerous lesions have been found and treated, averting morbidity and mortality due to cervical cancer. Quality improvement strategies may further improve service delivery as the program expands to reach all eligible WLHIV in Mozambique.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This manuscript has been supported by the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used PEPFAR Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting program.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos