ABSTRACT
Performance-Based Financing (PBF) has been implemented in many countries to improve healthcare access, quality, and outcomes while ensuring the efficient and equitable allocation of resources within the healthcare system. However, very little effort is visible in assessing its real impacts. This study evaluates the impact of the PBF project on health workers’ output and healthcare quality in the Mezam division in the North West region of Cameroon between 2012 and 2022. Specifically, the study aims to understand health workers’ perceptions of the PBF project, analyze the effect of PBF on health workers’ output, and examine the impact of PBF on healthcare quality. A structured questionnaire was used to generate panel data among healthcare workers in six beneficiary health districts in the study site. The perception scores were estimated based on the Net Promoter Score (NPS) methodology and variability tested using ANOVA. Health workers’ output and performance indicators were analyzed using the chi-square test, assessing the relation between PBF introduction and changes in health workers’ output, while healthcare quality metrics were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare healthcare quality before and after PBF implementation. The results showed that health workers’ perceptions varied but were generally positive, with a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of approximately 48.25. PBF significantly boosted health workers’ output (p = 0.002) and healthcare quality (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that the PBF project in the Mezam division had positive effects on workers’ output and healthcare quality. Given the positive impacts, the study recommends scaling up PBF initiatives in Cameroon and other African countries with precarious health systems. Our study demonstrates the relevance of impact assessments in providing evidence for making informed decisions on efficient resource allocation in the health sector.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Regional Ethical Committee for Human Health Research Northwest Region. Administrative clearance and verbal consent from health facility heads were also secured. Participants were informed about the study's aim and their voluntary participation. Confidentiality was ensured, and data were stored in a password-protected database accessible only to the primary researcher and supervisor.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is attached herein. Further information can be gotten from the authors via their emails.
