Abstract
Importance Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are known to slow gastric emptying, however the association between GLP-1 RA use and perioperative aspiration risk is not known.
Objective To summarize the evidence on whether GLP-1 RA exposure is associated with (1) pulmonary aspiration in patients undergoing procedures requiring anesthesia or sedation, or (2) increased residual gastric contents among fasted patients.
Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP registries (updated 21 Oct 2024), and citation tracking of included studies (25 Oct 2024).
Study Selection Studies assessing perioperative pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric contents among fasted patients who were using any form of GLP-1 RA.
Data extraction and synthesis Data was extracted independently and in duplicate. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for each outcome using random edect meta- analysis. Certainty of the evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.
Main outcomes measures Pulmonary aspiration and increased residual gastric contents, a common surrogate for aspiration risk.
Results Of 7,994 screened studies, 25 observational studies were included in the analysis. In a meta-analysis of 9 studies involving 184,724 individuals and 471 cases of aspiration, GLP-1RA exposure was not associated with pulmonary aspiration (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.25, low certainty evidence). In a meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 164,330 individuals and 3,742 cases of residual gastric contents, GLP-1RA exposure was positively associated with residual gastric contents despite appropriate fasting (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 3.30-6.33, very low certainty evidence). In a meta-analysis of 2 studies involving 877 individuals and 105 cases of residual gastric contents, withholding at least one dose of GLP-1 RA prior to a procedure was not associated with a lower odds of residual gastric contents (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.12-3.67, very low certainty evidence).
Conclusion Patients using GLP-1RAs are at heightened risk of presenting to surgery with residual gastric contents, though the available evidence does not indicate that this translates to an elevated risk of aspiration. Further research is needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of diderent strategies for managing these medications during the perioperative period.
Question What is the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use and the risk of pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric contents in fasted patients undergoing anesthesia?
Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 observational studies involving 464,552 patients found that preoperative GLP-1 RA exposure was not associated with pulmonary aspiration among patients undergoing surgery despite being associated with an elevated risk of residual gastric contents.
Meaning Currently there is limited evidence to suggest that patients using GLP-1 RAs are at a heightened risk of pulmonary aspiration, despite presenting more often to surgery with residual gastric contents than those not using GLP-1 RAs.
Competing Interest Statement
PS reported a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant, paid to her institution, in the past 36 months; reported being a council member of the Australian and New Zealand Obesity Society (ANZOS) and a member of The Obesity Collective leadership group; and reported being a co-author on manuscripts with a medical writer provided by Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly. CS reported receiving research support for investigator-initiated studies, paid to his institution, from Eli Lilly, St. Vincents Hospital Research Foundation. MD reported receiving research support for investigator-initiated studies, paid to her institution, from Medical Research Future Fund, NHMRC, Eli Lilly, Victorian Orthopaedic Foundation, Australian Orthopaedic Association Research Foundation, HCF Foundation, University of Melbourne, St. Vincents Hospital Research Foundation, and Arthritis & Osteoporosis Western Australia; reported receiving payment for provision of advice on guideline development for the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; reported receiving a sitting fee as a member of the Osteoarthritis Clinical Research Group Data & Safety Monitoring Board; and reported being a Board Director of the Australian Orthopaedic Association Research Foundation. MH reported receiving honoraria for lecture to Pillars of Dermatology Practice Symposium; and being a Chairperson for the HOPE fund. PC reported receiving research support for investigator-initiated studies from Medacta, Eli Lilly, Medibank Private, HCF foundation, National Health, Medical Research Foundation, and Medical Research Future Fund; received royalty fees from Kluwer; received consultancy fees from DePuy, Surgeon advisory board, Stryker Corporation, Johnson and Johnson, and Medacta; reported being on the Editorial Board for EFORT Reviews and Journal of Clinical Medicine, and reported being an international corresponding editor for JAAOS International. No other disclosures were reported.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024532229
Funding Statement
Funding/Support: JE was supported to conduct this work by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. No other funding or support was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
