Abstract
Background Dementia is a common disease influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. APOE ε4 is well-known to increase the risk of dementia, and it has been shown to attenuate the protective association of fish oil supplementation and the incidence of dementia. To identify more genetic factors with similar modifying effects, we performed a genome-wide scan.
Methods We first performed time-to-event genome-wide association study (GWAS) of all-cause dementia and two of its subtypes, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia, in the UK Biobank. GWAS were performed in all participants (N = 357,631) and in two subgroups with or without fish oil supplementation (N = 113,267 and 244,364, respectively). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) suggestively associated with dementia were then evaluated for their interactions with fish oil status in Cox-regression models. Furthermore, we conducted gene set enrichment analysis to identify the relevant cell types for these interaction signals.
Results Time-to-event GWAS identified 6, 5, and 2 genome-wide significant loci (p < 5e-8) for the incidence of all-cause dementia, AD, and vascular dementia, respectively. Most of them overlapped with previously known GWAS loci for AD and related dementia. A total of 178 suggestive GWAS loci (p < 1e-5) were passed onto interaction analysis, and 43 of them were found to significantly modify the association between fish oil supplementation and dementia incidence (p < 2.8e-4 with Bonferroni correction). One locus overlapped with a known AD GWAS locus (EED/PICALM) and two overlapped with GWAS loci for circulating omega-3 fatty acids (SRSF4, PSMG1). Gene set enrichment analysis found that candidate genes of interaction signals demonstrated tissue or cell-type specificity in the brain.
Conclusion We identified 43 genetic loci that modify the association between fish oil supplementation and dementia. These findings indicate a need for genome-informed personalized nutrition of fish oil supplementation for the purpose of dementia prevention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health under the award number R35GM143060 (KY). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank received ethical approval from the research ethics committee (reference ID: 11/ NW/0382).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the UK Biobank through an application process.
