Reference interval of optimal vitamin D level for an adult population of Bangladesh =================================================================================== * Wasim Md Mohosin Ul Haque * Jalaluddin Ashraful Haq * Md. Faruque Pathan * Mohammed Abu Sayeed ## Abstract Vitamin D deficiency presents a significant public health concern, especially in regions where reference intervals from Western populations may not apply due to differences in sun exposure and ethnicity. This study aimed to establish population-specific reference intervals for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and to determine a deficiency cutoff for healthy adults in Bangladesh. In a cross-sectional design, we assessed serum 25(OH)D and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in 125 coastal fishermen (Group 1) and 371 urban residents (Group 2), comprising healthy adults aged 18 years or older. Group 1 served as a reference to establish baseline vitamin D levels, while Group 2 data aided in determining the deficiency cutoff. Measurements were conducted using chemiluminescent immunoassay, and reference intervals were calculated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guidelines C28-A3. The deficiency cutoff was identified at the deflection point of iPTH levels. Results indicate a reference interval for serum 25(OH)D of 15.88–45.27 ng/ml among coastal fishermen. Among urban residents, mean serum 25(OH)D was 21.53 ± 15.98 ng/ml, with iPTH levels showing significant increases below 12.16 ng/ml (95% CI: 11.04–13.28), establishing this as the deficiency cutoff. Urban residents exhibited significantly lower vitamin D levels than coastal fishermen (21.53 ng/ml vs. 27.36 ng/ml, p < 0.001). Limitations include potential selection bias due to convenience sampling and the use of chemiluminescent immunoassay instead of the gold-standard LC-MS/MS assay. This study provides the first population-specific reference intervals for serum 25(OH)D in Bangladesh, accounting for unique sun exposure patterns and ethnic factors, and sets a deficiency threshold at 12.16 ng/ml. These findings are critical for guiding targeted interventions against vitamin D deficiency in this region. Keywords * Vitamin D * parathyroid hormone * reference interval * cut-off value * deflection point * coastal fishermen * urban population * Bangladesh ## Introduction Vitamin D, a crucial fat-soluble vitamin, plays a vital role in various physiological functions, including calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, immune function, and cell growth modulation(1–4). Consequently, its deficiency can lead to a range of diseases and disabilities (3, 5, 6). Despite Bangladesh’s favourable geographical location, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency remains high even among seemingly healthy individuals (7, 8). Current reference intervals for vitamin D are predominantly derived from studies conducted in Western populations and may not accurately reflect the physiological needs or health outcomes of diverse global populations(9, 10). Variations in genetics, skin pigmentation, dietary habits, and sun exposure significantly impact vitamin D levels, rendering universal reference intervals potentially inappropriate for many non-Western populations. Genetic polymorphisms affecting vitamin D metabolism and receptor activity vary among ethnic groups, leading to different optimal levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] required for health (11, 12). Consequently, a one-size-fits-all approach can result in incorrect diagnoses, unnecessary supplementation, potential toxicity, or under-treatment and persistence of deficiency-related health issues. Therefore, establishing a vitamin D reference interval specific to Bangladesh is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective management of vitamin D deficiency. This study aims to establish the reference interval of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels for the adult population of Bangladesh by examining two distinct groups: adequately sun-exposed healthy coastal fishermen and urban individuals with limited sun exposure. Also, the study determined the lower cut-off value of vitamin D deficiency level in Bangladeshi adults by detecting the deflection point of serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level compared to serum 25(OH)D level. Vitamin D deficiency physiologically induces increased synthesis/production of parathyroid hormone. ## Methodology The study was conducted from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics review board. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and data confidentiality was strictly maintained. ### Study site and population The study was conducted in two geographical locations: Cox’s Bazar, a coastal district, about 298 km south of Dhaka city along the coast of Bay of Bengal with abundant sunlight; and Dhaka, the capital city, characterized by limited sun exposure of its inhabitants due to urbanization. The study was conducted from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. ### Study design Cross-sectional study design was employed to assess vitamin D levels in two population groups: adequately sun-exposed healthy coastal fishermen (Group-1) and urban residents with limited sun exposure (Group-2). Group-1 consisted of healthy adult coastal fishermen aged 18 years and above from Cox’s Bazar, who are regularly and adequately exposed to sunlight and consume marine fish, a rich source of vitamin D. Adequate sun exposure was defined as exposure to direct sunlight at least for 30 minutes, between 11 am and 2 pm, three times a week (13). Group-1 individuals (coastal fishermen) were considered as reference population for determining the vitamin D reference interval of local population. Group-2 comprised of ostensibly healthy urban residents from Dhaka, aged 18 years and above, with limited sun exposure due to lifestyle and environmental factors. ### Exclusion Criteria Any individual who refused to participate in the study or who were physically and psychologically handicapped, had known acute or chronic illnesses like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, liver disease or gastrointestinal disorders, kidney disease, malignancy, metabolic bone disease, primary hyperparathyroidism or lactose intolerance were excluded. Anyone with relevant biochemical abnormalities and on anti-epileptic drugs was also excluded. For Group-1, anyone who was consuming either vitamin D or calcium-containing products or who had ever consumed such drugs in the past was excluded. ### Sampling technique and sample size Convenience sampling was used to select participants from both groups. The sample size was determined based on the desired confidence limits and the variability in vitamin D levels observed in preliminary studies. Adequate sample sizes were ensured to provide statistically significant results. ### Data collection tools and procedures Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using structured questionnaires. Height, weight, and blood pressure were measured, and blood samples were collected for estimation of serum 25(OH)D, iPTH levels and relevant biochemical parameters. The biochemical analyses were conducted using standardized procedures to ensure accuracy and reliability. ### Collection of blood and biochemical investigations About 10 ml ofvenous blood was collected aseptically from each participant after counselling and thorough clinical evaluation. Serum was separated immediately and was preserved at –60C for biochemical analysis. Chemiluminescent micro-particle immunoassay (CMIA) was used to estimate serum 25(OH)D level (14) by Architect analyser. Based on the Endocrine Society guideline (9), **v**itamin D level was categorised as: adequate/normal range: 75-100 nmol/L (30-40ng/ml), insufficient: 50 – 74.9 nmol/L (20ng/ml-29.99ng/ml) and deficient: <50 nmol/L (<20ng/ml). Samples were tested for random blood glucose (RBG), serum creatinine, calcium, PO4, albumin, alkaline phosphatase and iPTH by Architect autoanalyser at the biochemistry laboratory of BIRDEM. ### Statistical Analyses Statistical analyses were conducted using descriptive and inferential methods to summarize the data and assess factors influencing vitamin D levels. Chi-square tests, correlation analyses, and regression models were employed to explore these relationships. MedCalc version 14 statistical software was utilized to calculate reference intervals (95%, double-sided) following parametric, non-parametric, and robust methods as outlined in the CLSI C28-A3 guideline(15). A 90% confidence interval (CI) was used for these reference intervals, applying the appropriate statistical techniques. To determine the lower cutoff value of vitamin D deficiency, the deflection point of serum iPTH levels was identified using a non-linear model. Piecewise linear regression, applied through the Python plugin, was used to fit two separate lines before and after the deflection point (or “break” point), where the relationship between vitamin D and PTH shifts. The equation used in this case represented as follows: ![Formula][1] In this model: * x represents Vitamin D level (independent variable). * y represents PTH level (dependent variable). * x is the deflection point where the two lines meet. * y is the PTH level at the deflection point. * k1 is the slope of the line before the deflection point (for x .05, 95% CI: –5.86, 0.66). However, nonparametric methods indicated significantly higher levels in females (p=.008). Table 8 shows that mean serum vitamin D levels were significantly higher in older age groups (p = .001) and positively correlated with age in urban populations (r = .174, p = .001, 95% CI:0.073, 0.271; Figure 3). There were no significant differences in vitamin D levels between BMI groups (F = 0.173, p > .05). ![Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F3) Figure 3: Correlation between age and vitamin D View this table: [Table 8.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/T8) Table 8. Age (MeSH classification) and BMI (WHO classification) specific serum Vitamin D levels of Group-2 study population (n=371) According to the Endocrine Society cut-off value (9), 83.6% of the urban population had below-normal (inadequate) vitamin D levels. However, using the fishermen’s reference intervals established in the first phase of this study, only 44.2% of the urban population were found to have below-normal vitamin D levels (Table 9). Approximately 47% of individuals classified as having inadequate vitamin D levels by the Endocrine Society’s criteria were actually within the adequate range based on the fishermen’s reference interval (**Error! Reference source not found.**). The mean serum vitamin D level was significantly lower in the urban group (21.53±15.98 ng/ml) compared to fishermen (27.36±7.27 ng/ml); 95% CI [-7.91, –3.76], p < .001. View this table: [Table 9.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/T9) Table 9. Vitamin D status of the urban people based on the Endocrine society cut-off value and fishermen’s reference interval The mean serum iPTH level in the urban population was 62.80 ±31.67 pg/ml, with a median of 56.40 pg/ml, ranging from 10.20 to 227.54 pg/ml. There was a significant negative correlation between serum vitamin D and serum iPTH (r = –0.233, 95% CI: –0.3273, –0.1347; p < .001) (Figure). However, the significant differences in PTH values among different vitamin D segments indicate a nonlinear relationship between vitamin D and PTH (Table 10). View this table: [Table 10.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/T10) Table 10. Mean PTH level in different vitamin D segments based on Endocrine society cut-off value The LOWESS (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing) method was employed to illustrate the relationship between serum iPTH and serum 25(OH)D. It was found that as vitamin D level decreased, PTH level decreased until reaching a plateau (Figure 5). This plateau, known as the PTH deflection point, indicates the lower cut-off for optimal serum vitamin D levels. Using piecewise linear regression with the Python plugin in SPSS, the visually estimated deflection point of 12.5 ng/ml was refined to 12.16 ng/ml, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 11.04 ng/ml to 13.28 ng/ml. ![Figure 4:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F4) Figure 4: Correlation between serum vitamin D and serum iPTH in urban population ![Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F5.medium.gif) [Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316898/F5) Figure 5: The scatterplot with LOESS fitting (50%) illustrates the relationship between vitamin D and PTH, with vitamin D (ng/ml) on the x-axis and serum iPTH (pg/ml) on the y-axis. The vertical line indicates the PTH deflection point using the raw data. ## Discussion ### Health The study focused on the health of Group-1 (coastal fishermen), ensuring all participants were clinically and biochemically healthy. This prerequisite allowed for an accurate determination of the reference interval for vitamin D. The coastal environment, with its pollution-free air, excellent sun exposure, and consumption of marine fish, ensured vitamin D adequacy for this group. Prior studies, such as the 1958 birth cohort study in Scotland, have also linked coastal climates with higher levels of 25(OH)D due to increased sun exposure (16). The inclusion of only male participants in Group 1 to ensure adequate sun exposure might be seen as a limitation. However, other studies indicate no significant gender-specific differences in vitamin D levels (8, 17). Overweight subjects were excluded from Group 1, yet a significant negative correlation between vitamin D and BMI was observed, consistent with previous findings (18–21). Studies consistently show an inverse relationship between BMI and vitamin D levels, highlighting the impact of body weight on vitamin D status (22–24). The lack of correlation between age and serum vitamin D levels in Group 1 suggests the overall good health of the study population. This may obscure the typical association between lower vitamin D levels and older age, often attributed to reduced outdoor activity and impaired kidney function in older adults (25). Health status of the Group-2 participants was not as strictly controlled, with only those with acute illnesses being excluded. This approach aligns with other studies examining the correlation between PTH and vitamin D, which often include people with a broader range of health statuses (26–32). ### Vitamin D Status In the present study, irrespective of the adequacy of sun exposure, most participants in both the fishermen and urban groups had low vitamin D levels, with means of 27.36±7.27 ng/ml and 21.53±15.98 ng/ml, respectively. This high prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy aligns with recent studies reporting widespread vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency in Bangladesh (8, 33–39). For instance, Mahmood et al. (2017) found that 100% of garment workers and 97% of agricultural and construction workers had low vitamin D levels. Garment workers, in particular, are at high risk due to limited sun exposure and poor nutritional status (40). Within urban participants, hospital staff had lower vitamin D levels and a higher prevalence of inadequacy compared to healthy volunteers. This finding is supported by multiple studies indicating a high prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy among health personnel (41–46). The positive correlation between vitamin D and age in the urban population may be explained by higher supplement use among older individuals (43, 47, 48). Vitamin D supplementation, as shown in various studies, significantly increases serum 25(OH)D levels (43, 49). The higher vitamin D levels in coastal fishermen compared to urban dwellers underscore the importance of sunlight exposure. Similar studies, such as those by Lee et al. (2018) and Haddad and Chyu (1971), also reported higher vitamin D levels in individuals with significant sun exposure. Despite this, around 70% of coastal fishermen in this study had low vitamin D levels according to the Endocrine Society’s cut-off, raising questions about the validity of the use of current threshold values. Previous studies in heavily sun-exposed regions in India, report similar findings of low vitamin D levels despite abundant sun exposure (50, 51). ### Reference Interval and Cut-off Point The reference intervals for vitamin D established in this study using healthy coastal fishermen population may represent the optimal levels for the Bangladeshi population. The reasoning behind this conclusion lies in both the nature of the studied group and the limitations of previous definitions of “optimal” vitamin D status. Historically, earlier studies that defined vitamin D thresholds were methodologically flawed. Those studies failed to adequately consider factors such as sun exposure, health, and geographic variation (52–54). The use of populations with insufficient sun exposure led to a skewed understanding of vitamin D requirements. For example, previous normative ranges (10-55 ng/mL) did not accurately capture true vitamin D deficiency, especially in groups with limited sun exposure. In contrast, populations like coastal fishermen, who have high exposure to sunlight, provide a more accurate picture of what might be the “natural” or optimal vitamin D levels for people living in sun-rich environments like Bangladesh. In this study, a reference interval of 15.88 ng/mL (90% CI: 14.26–16.92) to 45.27 ng/mL (90% CI: 41.11–51.85) was determined using non-parametric methods aligning with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guidelines(55). The non-parametric approach is appropriate given the asymmetry of the data, providing a robust understanding of the distribution in the fishermen population. The upper limit of 45.27 ng/mL aligns with the commonly accepted upper limit proposed by the Endocrine Society, suggesting the upper threshold of vitamin D status is consistent across various populations. However, the lower limit of 15.88 ng/mL stands below the traditionally accepted threshold levels (often cited as 20-30 ng/mL). This finding is supported by evidence from other population where lower cut-off values for vitamin D sufficiency have been proposed. For instance, studies from South Korea (56), India (30), China (28), and Greece (29) have consistently shown lower thresholds of 13-20 ng/mL. The range in this study is closer to those findings, implying that vitamin D requirements are likely influenced by both environmental and genetic factors, and that a universal cut-off point may not be applicable globally. Moreover, PTH dynamics provide additional support for these lower thresholds. Vitamin D inadequacy is often marked by increased PTH levels, which serve as a surrogate marker for deficiency. However, in this study, no significant correlation between vitamin D and PTH levels was found in the coastal fishermen, unlike in the urban population, where a deflection point in PTH occurred at levels far below the Endocrine Society’s recommended 30 ng/mL. Studies involving other population have noted similar findings: PTH rises as vitamin D level drops below 8-21.1 ng/mL (26, 28–30, 32, 57–60). These studies suggest that a threshold for PTH deflection, and thus vitamin D sufficiency, may indeed be lower than previously thought. The absence of PTH deflection in coastal fishermen may indicate the overall vitamin D adequacy of this population. Additional support in favour of our low reference interval and lower cut-off values for vitamin D sufficiency comes from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. For instance, post hoc analyses from trials like VITAL and ViDA revealed that vitamin D supplementation benefited participants only when baseline levels were below 12-15 ng/mL (61–63). Martineau et al. (2017) noted that vitamin D supplementation was most effective in preventing respiratory infections in participants with baseline levels below 10 ng/mL (64). These findings argue against higher supplementation thresholds and support a more moderate cut-off for deficiency. Furthermore, based on epidemiological evidence, Manson et al. (2016) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), supports a deficiency threshold closer to 12.5 ng/mL(63, 65). Studies in pregnancy and diabetes prevention also point toward 15 ng/mL as a sufficient level for avoiding adverse outcomes (31, 66). Based on this evidence, it is logical to conclude that the reference interval identified in the current study (15.88–45.27 ng/mL) could reflect the optimal range for the Bangladeshi population. The high sun exposure in coastal fishermen makes this population an ideal reference group, better reflecting the biological requirements of individuals in sun-rich environments like Bangladesh. Moreover, the lower limit of this range is consistent with thresholds suggested by contemporary studies that challenge higher vitamin D cut-off points. Thus, considering the surrogate evidence, PTH dynamics, and recent trial data, this study provides a more region-specific, evidence-backed approach in determining optimal vitamin D levels. ### Strengths and Limitations of this Study * The study employed a cross-sectional design, sampling both coastal fishermen and urban residents to establish the reference interval of vitamin D and determine the lower cutoff value. * Reference intervals were established following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guidelines C28-A3 for precise comparison across populations, and the lower cutoff value was identified using the PTH deflection point. * Data collection included structured questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and standardized biochemical testing to ensure accuracy and reliability. * The study did not employ strict random sampling, which may introduce selection bias and limit generalizability. * The absence of a gold-standard LC-MS/MS vitamin D assay may affect the precision of biochemical measurements. ### Conclusion and Recommendations Vitamin D, an essential micronutrient, is endogenously produced when exposed to sunlight. Despite the global prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency, landmark trials have not justified routine vitamin D supplementation for the general population. The optimal vitamin D level remains controversial and may vary depending on population and geography. Bangladesh, with its ample sunlight, still faces widespread vitamin D inadequacy according to current reference values. This study’s findings on healthy coastal fishermen provide critical insights into the optimal serum vitamin D levels for Bangladeshis. Additionally, the study has defined the lower normal limit of vitamin D sufficiency by determining the serum iPTH deflection point, suggesting a lower optimal range than currently used. Thus, the findings of the present study would help in guiding clinicians and policymakers in developing appropriate treatment and supplementation guidelines for Bangladeshi population. ## Data Availability Statement The dataset supporting the conclusions of this study is available in the Zenodo repository, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13950605. Additional materials, such as the technical appendix and statistical code, can also be accessed at this DOI. ## Funding Statement The research received funding from the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC). ## Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ## Author Contributions Professor **Wasim Md Mohosin Ul Haque** made substantial contributions as the primary researcher, leading the data collection, analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. Professors **Jalaluddin Ashraful Haq**, **Md. Faruque Pathan**, and **Mohammed Abu Sayeed** contributed equally to the conception, design, interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors provided final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that any questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part are appropriately investigated and resolved. ## Corresponding author Professor Wasim Md Mohosin Ul Haque E-mail ID: wmmhaque{at}live.com, Mobile number: +8801915472750 ## Co-authors Professors Jalaluddin Ashraful Haq Email: jahaq54{at}yahoo.com Professors Md. Faruque Pathan Email: pathan279{at}yahoo.com Professors Mohammed Abu Sayeed Email: sayeed1950{at}gmail.com * Received November 7, 2024. * Revision received November 7, 2024. * Accepted November 8, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Layana AG, Minnella AM, Garhöfer G, Aslam T, Holz FG, Leys A, et al. Vitamin D and Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Nutrients. 2017;9(10):1120. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29027953&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 2. 2.Nair R, Maseeh A. Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin. Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics. 2012;3(2):118–26. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22629085&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 3. 3.Rebelos E, Tentolouris N, Jude E. The Role of Vitamin D in Health and Disease: A Narrative Review on the Mechanisms Linking Vitamin D with Disease and the Effects of Supplementation. Drugs. 2023;83(8):665–85. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=37148471&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 4. 4.Yin K, Agrawal DK. Vitamin D and inflammatory diseases. J Inflamm Res. 2014;7:69–87. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2147/JIR.S63898&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24971027&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 5. 5.Ahmed S, Goldberg GR, Raqib R, Roy SK, Haque S, Braithwaite VS, et al. Aetiology of nutritional rickets in rural Bangladeshi children. Bone. 2020;136:115357. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32276153&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 6. 6.Islam MZ, Bhuiyan N, Akhtaruzzaman M, Lamberg-Allardt C, Fogelholm M. Vitamin D deficiency in Bangladesh: A review of prevalence, causes and recommendations for mitigation. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;31:167–80. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35766552&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 7. 7.Haque WMMU, Pathan MF, Sayeed M. Vitamin D status of healthy coastal fishermen of Bangladesh. IMC Journal of Medical Science. 2019;13(2):35–9. 8. 8.Acherjya GK, Ali M, Tarafder K, Akhter N, Chowdhury MK, Islam DU, et al. Study of vitamin D deficiency among the apparently healthy population in Jashore, Bangladesh. Mymensingh medical journal. 2019;28(1):214–21. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30755572&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 9. 9.Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2011;96(7):1911–30. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21646368&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 10. 10.Chopra B, Singh S, Singh K. Is there A Need to Reasses Reference Levels of Vitamin D for India ?-A Preliminary Survey of Vitamin D Levels in the Normal Population of Punjab. International Journal of Science and Research. 2015;4(1):1246–8. 11. 11.Cauley JA, Lui LY, Ensrud KE, Zmuda JM, Stone KL, Hochberg MC, et al. Bone mineral density and the risk of incident nonspinal fractures in black and white women. Jama. 2005;293(17):2102–8. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.293.17.2102&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15870413&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228808200019&link_type=ISI) 12. 12.Bell NH, Greene A, Epstein S, Oexmann MJ, Shaw S, Shary J. Evidence for alteration of the vitamin D-endocrine system in blacks. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1985;76(2):470–3. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/JCI111995&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3839801&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985APT9300012&link_type=ISI) 13. 13.Harinarayan CV, Holick MF, Prasad UV, Vani PS, Himabindu G. Vitamin D status and sun exposure in India. Dermato-endocrinology. 2013;5(1):130–41. 14. 14.Hutchinson K, Healy M, Crowley V, Louw M, Rochev Y. Verification of Abbott 25-OH-vitamin D assay on the Architect system. Pract Lab Med. 2017;7:27–35. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28856215&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 15. 15. CLSI CJD, establishing,, laboratory vriitc. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline. 2008. 16. 16.Cherrie MP, Wheeler BW, White MP, Sarran CE, Osborne NJ. Coastal climate is associated with elevated solar irradiance and higher 25(OH)D level. Environment international. 2015;77:76–84. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25660687&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 17. 17.Souberbielle J-C, Massart C, Brailly-Tabard S, Cavalier E, Chanson PJE. Prevalence and determinants of vitamin D deficiency in healthy French adults: the VARIETE study. 2016;53(2):543–50. 18. 18.Forrest KY, Stuhldreher WL. Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults. Nutrition research (New York, NY). 2011;31(1):48–54. 19. 19.Compher CW, Badellino KO, Boullata JI. Vitamin D and the bariatric surgical patient: a review. Obesity surgery. 2008;18(2):220–4. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11695-007-9289-6&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18176832&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000253091200016&link_type=ISI) 20. 20.Vanlint S. Vitamin D and obesity. Nutrients. 2013;5(3):949–56. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/nu5030949&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23519290&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000316610400020&link_type=ISI) 21. 21.Lagunova Z, Porojnicu AC, Lindberg F, Hexeberg S, Moan J. The Dependency of Vitamin D Status on Body Mass Index, Gender, Age and Season. 2009;29(9):3713–20. 22. 22.Selvarajan S, Gunaseelan V, Anandabaskar N, Xavier AS, Srinivasamurthy S, Kamalanathan SK, et al. Systematic review on vitamin D level in apparently healthy Indian population and analysis of its associated factors. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. 2017;21(5):765–75. 23. 23.Bhatt SP, Misra A, Sharma M, Guleria R, Pandey RM, Luthra K, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with abdominal obesity in urban Asian Indians without diabetes in North India. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2014;16(6):392–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24528222&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 24. 24.Leary PF, Zamfirova I, Au J, McCracken WH. Effect of latitude on vitamin D levels. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2017;117(7):433–9. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28662556&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 25. 25.Gallagher JC. Vitamin D and aging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):319–32. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ecl.2013.02.004&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23702404&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 26. 26.Choi SW, Kweon SS, Choi JS, Rhee JA, Lee YH, Nam HS, et al. Estimation of the cutoff value of vitamin D: the Dong-gu study. J Physiol Anthropol. 2015;34:10. 27. 27.Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357(3):266–81. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMra070553&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17634462&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000248115100008&link_type=ISI) 28. 28.Hu Y, Li S, Liu Z, Yang X, Yang L. [Exploring study on the cutoff of vitamin D deficiency in Chinese adults]. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2020;49(5):699–704. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33070813&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 29. 29.Katrinaki M, Kampa M, Margioris A, Castanas E, Malliaraki N. Vitamin D levels in a large Mediterranean cohort: reconsidering normal cut-off values. Hormones (Athens). 2016;15(2):205–23. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27376424&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 30. 30.Mukhopadhyay P, Ghosh S, Bhattacharjee K, Chowdhury S. Inverse Relationship Between 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D and Parathormone: Are there Two Inflection Points? Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;23(4):422–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31741900&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 31. 31.Rostami M, Simbar M, Amiri M, Bidhendi-Yarandi R, Hosseinpanah F, Ramezani Tehrani F. The optimal cut-off point of vitamin D for pregnancy outcomes using a generalized additive model. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):2145–53. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33039154&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 32. 32.Shah S, Chiang C, Sikaris K, Lu Z, Bui M, Zebaze R, et al. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Insufficiency in Search of a Bone Disease. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2017;102(7):2321–8. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28379394&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 33. 33.Islam MZ, Shamim AA, Kemi V, Nevanlinna A, Akhtaruzzaman M, Laaksonen M, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and low bone status in adult female garment factory workers in Bangladesh. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(6):1322–9. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18430266&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000255955500023&link_type=ISI) 34. 34.Mahmood S, Rahman M, Biswas SK, Saqueeb SN, Zaman S, Manirujjaman M, et al. Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone Status in Female Garment Workers: A Case-Control Study in Bangladesh. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4105375. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28473985&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 35. 35.Ahmed AS, Haque WMMU, Uddin KN, Abrar FA, Afroz F, Huque HF, et al. Vitamin D and bone mineral density status among postmenopausal Bangladeshi women. IMC Journal of Medical Science. 2018;12(2):44–9. 36. 36.Hossain HT, Islam QT, Khandaker MAK, Ahasan HN. Study of serum vitamin D level in different socio-demographic population-A pilot study. Journal of Medicine. 2018;19(1):22–9. 37. 37.Shefin SM, Qureshi NK, Nessa A, Latif ZA. Vitamin D status among Bangladeshi adult Muslim females having Diabetes and using hijab. BIRDEM Medical Journal. 2018;8(3):203–9. 38. 38.Khan AU, Hossain MA, Rahman MA, Rahman HW, Reza MA, Khan MK, et al. Estimation of vitamin D levels among physicians working in a tertiary Level hospital of Bangladesh. Mymensingh medical journal. 2019;28(2):322–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31086146&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 39. 39.Siddiqee MH, Bhattacharjee B, Siddiqi UR, MeshbahurRahman M. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among the South Asian adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1823. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-021-11888-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34627207&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 40. 40.Akter S, Zubair M, Haque M. Assessment of nutritional status and food intake pattern of the selected adolescent industrial female workers in Bangladesh. Journal of Science and Technology. 2017;7(1):171–7. 41. 41.Bishnoi S, Gombar S, Ahuja V, Bhardwaj N, Kaur J. Vitamin D levels of anesthesiologists working in tertiary care hospital of South Asian country: An observational study. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2021;37(2):237–42. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34349373&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 42. 42.Dogruel F, Gonen ZB, Canpolat DG, Ocak H, Bayram F. Investigation of Vitamin D levels in medical staff in a dental clinic. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(4):573–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30975965&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 43. 43.Farooka MW, Aslam SS, Tarar MA, Rafi M, Ahmad A, Rafique N, et al. Vitamin D perspective in front line healthcare workers amid COVID-19. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021;3(4):65–72. 44. 44.Matini E, Shayeghi F, Lazemi V, Mojri N, Esmaeili H, Bagher A, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency Among Operating Room Staffs. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2021;13(1). 45. 45.Shakiba M, Rafiei P. PREVALENCE OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY AMONG MEDICAL STAFF IN SHAHID SADOUGHI HOSPITAL IN YAZD, IRAN. TOLOO-E-BEHDASHT. 2009;7(3-4 (25)):-. 46. 46.Sowah D, Fan X, Dennett L, Hagtvedt R, Straube S. Vitamin D levels and deficiency with different occupations: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):519. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-017-4436-z&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28637448&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 47. 47.Nasri H, Ardalan MR. Association of serum vitamin D level with age in individuals with normal renal function. J Nephropharmacol. 2012;1(1):7–9. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28197424&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 48. 48.Khazaei Z, Khazaei S, Beigrezaei S, Nasri H. Vitamin D deficiency in healthy people and its relationship with gender and age. J parathyr dis. 2018;6(1):16–8. 49. 49.Whiting SJ, Bonjour JP, Payen FD, Rousseau B. Moderate amounts of vitamin D3 in supplements are effective in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D from low baseline levels in adults: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2015;7(4):2311–23. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/nu7042311&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25835074&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 50. 50.Rattan R, Sahoo D, Mahapatra S. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adults in the coastal regions of Odisha, India. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Science. 2016;Volume 11(Issue 6):49–52. 51. 51.Harinarayan C, Ramalakshmi T, Prasad U, Sudhakar DJIJoMR. Vitamin D status in Andhra Pradesh: a population based study. 2008;127(3):211. 52. 52.Malabanan A, Veronikis IE, Holick MF. Redefining vitamin D insufficiency. Lancet. 1998;351(9105):805-6. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(05)78933-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9519959&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 53. 53.Holick MF. The Vitamin D Deficiency Pandemic: a Forgotten Hormone Important for Health. Public Health Reviews. 2010;32(1):267–83. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF03391602&link_type=DOI) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000279245900021&link_type=ISI) 54. 54.Haddad JG, Chyu KJ. Competitive protein-binding radioassay for 25-hydroxycholecalciferol. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1971;33(6):992–5. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4332615&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 55. 55.Henny J, Vassault A, Boursier G, Vukasovic I, Mesko Brguljan P, Lohmander M, et al. Recommendation for the review of biological reference intervals in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(12):1893–900. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27748267&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 56. 56.Lee DH, Park KS, Cho MC. Laboratory confirmation of the effect of occupational sun exposure on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Medicine. 2018;97(27):e11419. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29979442&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 57. 57.Thomas MK, Lloyd-Jones DM, Thadhani RI, Shaw AC, Deraska DJ, Kitch BT, et al. Hypovitaminosis D in medical inpatients. The New England journal of medicine. 1998;338(12):777–83. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJM199803193381201&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9504937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000072546800001&link_type=ISI) 58. 58.Asghari G, Yuzbashian E, Wagner CL, Mahdavi M, Shamsi R, Hosseinpanah F, et al. The relation between circulating levels of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: Quest for a threshold. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0225717. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31770397&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 59. 59.Atapattu N, Shaw N, Hogler W. Relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone in the search for a biochemical definition of vitamin D deficiency in children. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(5):552–6. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/pr.2013.139&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23999068&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 60. 60.Metzger M, Houillier P, Gauci C, Haymann JP, Flamant M, Thervet E, et al. Relation between circulating levels of 25(OH) vitamin D and parathyroid hormone in chronic kidney disease: quest for a threshold. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2013;98(7):2922–8. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/jc.2013-1294&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23633202&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 61. 61.LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Murata EM, Donlon CM, Cook NR, Mora S, et al. Effects of Supplemental Vitamin D on Bone Health Outcomes in Women and Men in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL). Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2020. 62. 62.Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, Gamble GD, Al-Abuwsi F, Singh M, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D on bone density in community-dwelling older adults substudy of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of internal medicine. 2017;282(5):452–60. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/joim.12651&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28692172&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) 63. 63.Manson J, Brannon PM, Rosen CJ, Taylor CLJTNEjom. Vitamin D deficiency-is there really a pandemic? 2016;375(19):1817. 64. 64.Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;356:i6583. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNTYvZmViMTVfNC9pNjU4MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzExLzA4LzIwMjQuMTEuMDcuMjQzMTY4OTguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 65. 65.Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D, Calcium. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB, editors. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright © 2011, National Academy of Sciences.; 2011. 66. 66.Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B, Sheehan P, Ware JH, Knowler WC, Aroda VR, et al. Vitamin D Supplementation and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(6):520–30. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1900906&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31173679&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F11%2F08%2F2024.11.07.24316898.atom) [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif