Assessing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Long COVID: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a South Texas Long COVID Clinic ==================================================================================================================== * Anne Marie Wells * Summer Rolin * Barbara Robles-Ramamurthy * Gabriela Gibson-Lopez * Martin Goros * Jonathan A Gelfond * Stephen Gelfond * Philip Balfanz * Melissa Deuter * Donald McGeary * Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez ## Abstract Long COVID, previously known as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), refers to prolonged symptoms or diagnosable conditions following COVID-19 infection. The neuropsychiatric profile of Long COVID patients remains ambiguous. This study aimed to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms in a retrospective cohort of Long COVID patients (N = 162) at a Rehabilitation Medicine clinic in South Texas. Clinical data from patient records were used to calculate a Symptom Score, and screening tools for stress/PTSD (PCL-5), anxiety (GAD-7), and quality of life (SWL) were employed to evaluate if Long COVID duration and severity could predict neuropsychiatric outcomes. The majority were female (71%) and Hispanic (53%) who presented for treatment of Long COVID symptoms during the study period, including fatigue (93%), coughing/shortness of breath (81%), fever (67%), anosmia (58%), ageusia (54%), and weight loss (56%). There was a high burden of neuropsychiatric symptoms, including subjective cognitive impairment (79%), headache (74%), and insomnia (58%). Symptom Score (median = 9, IQR [8,11]) was significantly correlated with increased depression (PHQ-9; p < 0.05), anxiety (GAD-7; p < 0.05) and elevated stress/PTSD (PCL-5; p < 0.05) symptoms. Long COVID patients taking stimulants or mood stabilizers had higher GAD-7 (p < 0.031, p < 0.035) and PHQ-9 (p < 0.034, p < 0.009) scores but not PCL-5 scores. Importantly, duration of Long COVID symptomatology also did not predict PCL-5 scores. No patient factors (e.g., sex, age, BMI, ethnicity) mediated Symptom Score. Nonetheless, historically marginalized groups, such as women and Hispanics, have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. This study is the first to utilize validates screening tools to determine the presence and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Long COVID patients. These findings may guide clinical management and future research on Long COVID, especially in historically excluded populations. **Scope Statement** We enthusiastically submit our Original Research article, entitled “**Assessing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Long COVID: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a South Texas Long COVID Clinic**” for consideration for publication in the journal Frontiers in Neurology. We believe the scope of our article aligns well with the scope and aim of the journal’s Neurorehabilitation Section. Long COVID is a debilitating neurological disorder with prominent and enduring cognitive and psychological impact. This study sought to characterize Long COVID symptoms from a cohort of patients at a Rehabilitation Medicine/Long COVID clinic in Southwest Texas. We stratified symptoms using validated psychiatric evaluation tools (e.g., PCL-5, GAD-7, PHQ-9) to determine if and to what extent psychiatric comorbidity exacerbated Long COVID symptoms. Our findings suggest that a Long COVID patient’s depression, anxiety, and stress/post traumatic stress scores are highly correlated with other neurological symptoms. We advance the implementation of a Long COVID “Symptom Score”, as well as the use of validated screening instruments to identify psychiatric features of Long COVID with the goal of maximizing life satisfaction and function over the course of treatment. Key Words * PASC * Long COVID * PTSD * stress * depression * anxiety * PCL-5 * GAD-7 * PHQ-9 ## Introduction The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes acute COVID-19 infection, is an ongoing public health concern that is here to stay (1). Therefore, continued study of this disease and its multifactorial impact on health and longevity is essential to advance the development of effective therapeutic and prevention strategies. Most individuals recover from COVID-19 infection within 5-20 days, depending on severity of symptoms;(2,3) yet a recent meta-analysis (4) estimated 31-69% of COVID-19 patients endure ongoing, relapsing and remitting, or progressive symptoms beyond 30 days of primary infection. The resulting syndrome is known as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC)(5) or Long COVID, which is now defined by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as an infection-associated chronic condition (IACC) that occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems(6). Long COVID symptomatology (5,7–9) has been tracked in both small(10) and large(9,11,12) longitudinal cohort studies. In addition to continued symptoms of the acute infection (e.g., coughing, shortness of breath, loss of taste and smell), all studies to date have identified a common clustering of symptoms primarily affecting neurologic or neuropsychiatric systems(4,5,9–12). These symptoms include chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment (“brain fog”), headache, pain syndromes, anxiety and depression. Most patients experience Long COVID cluster symptoms for at least 6 months and upwards of 3 years out from primary infection(9). Thus, Long Covid poses a significant and chronic disruption to patient lives, as demonstrated by increased disability and economic burden reported in this population(13). Risk factors(9,13–15) for Long COVID include those for risk of more severe COVID-19 infection, such as obesity, age, premorbid metabolic or cardiovascular conditions -- and, critically, healthcare equity and access. Historically marginalized groups, like women and Hispanics, have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic(13–18). Strikingly, the largest cohorts following the natural history of Long COVID have disproportionately sampled Caucasian men(9,11). Thus, there may be significant gaps in our understanding of how various patient factors may impact the complexity and duration of PASC symptoms. There are no cures nor adequate treatments for Long COVID apart from symptom management. Importantly, studies published to date have relied entirely on self-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms without the support of validated screening tools that could facilitate uncovering the etiology of neuropsychiatric symptoms. We hypothesized that while chronic stress and anxiety do not directly facilitate the development of Long COVID, they may contribute to its complex symptomatology. Thus, we sought to characterize Long COVID symptoms in a cohort of patients (N = 162; 71% female, 53% Hispanic, median BMI = 30 [obese]) who presented in a Rehabilitation Medicine clinic in South Texas. We applied a proof-of-concept methodology to rapidly screen for major clusters of Long COVID symptomatology (i.e., “Symptom Score”) that can be employed with a battery of widely used screening tools for comorbid stress, anxiety, and mood disorder neuropsychiatric symptoms. Our findings point to high burden of fatigue, cognitive impairment, and anxiety measures in Long COVID patients that exacerbate the core Long COVID symptom profile. The associated impact on quality of life and risk of worsening psychiatric conditions demands greater attention to neuropsychiatric symptoms in the management of Long COVID patients, particularly amongst marginalized groups. ## Results ### Long COVID patients report high rates of fatigue with neuropsychiatric symptomatology We characterized the self-reported symptom profile in Long COVID patients (N = 162), defined as symptoms or conditions present for at least 30 days after acute COVID-19 infection. Symptoms and conditions considered in this study were based on major categories determined by previous studies(5,9,11). The top-ranked symptoms within this cohort are summarized in Figure 1. Of note, 89% of the sample received an initial COVID-19 infection diagnosis by positive test (Fig 1). The distribution of approximate time elapsed since COVID-19 infection was approximately normal (Fig S1A). Of note, all patients received initial COVID-19 diagnosis within one of the major peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic (Fig S2). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F1) Figure 1. Summary of Symptom Score Components and incidence (%) in analytical sample. We collected self-reported data on PASC symptomatology across all major systems as previously described (Bowe et al 2023; Cai et al 2024). Symptoms were ranked by incidence (% of patients who reported symptom) in our sample. We then calculated a PASC Symptom Score based on the total number of comorbid symptoms present in a patient based on the top 16 most common symptoms, summarized here. Of note, the most common PASC symptoms noted by our sample was fatigue (93%). There was a high burden of symptoms classically related to acute COVID-19 infection (coughing, shortness of breath [SOB], loss of smell and taste) as well as subjective neuropsychiatric symptoms (cognitive impairment = 79%, muscle/joint pain = 78%, insomnia/sleep disturbance = 58%). The most common symptom reported in our cohort was fatigue (93%). At time of assessment, only 25% were currently exercising. Patients commonly reported myriad symptoms commonly associated with Long COVID fatigue(19), such as gastrointestinal (diarrhea [43%]), nausea/vomiting [38%], weight loss [58%]) and autoimmune (rash [21%]) symptoms. Most patients also reported a prolonged cluster of symptoms of acute COVID-19 infection, including coughing or shortness of breath (81%), fever (67%), loss of smell (58%), and loss of taste (54%). The burden of neuropsychiatric symptoms in this cohort was striking. A substantial number of patients reported subjective cognitive impairment (79%), headache (74%), increased time spent in bed (73%), insomnia/sleep disturbance (58%). Many patients also reported new onset of muscle and/or joint pain (78%). In this analysis, we noted that very few patients in this cohort reported being hospitalized or requiring a ventilator during initial COVID-19 infection. Moreover, few required oxygen therapy or sustained cardiac damage because of COVID-19 infection. Thus, our cohort largely represents a patient group with Long COVID symptomatology following non-severe primary COVID-19 infection. ### Patient factors do not predict Long COVID Symptom Score We next sought to determine if patient factors predicted Long COVID symptom burden (Table 1). To this end, we ranked the incidences of self-reported symptoms or conditions present in our cohort. We then summed the total number of symptoms reported from the top 16-ranked symptoms for each patient as a Symptom Score. The median Symptom Score was 9 (IQR [8, 11]). We analyzed the relatedness of Symptom Scores across the cohort to patient factors. We also sought to determine if there were significant differences in patient factors between two subgroups divided by the median Symptom Score. We considered various patient factors, including biological sex, age, body mass index (BMI), race and ethnicity. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/T1) Table 1. Summary of patient factors and prediction of Long COVID Symptom Score. More female (N = 117, 73%) than male (N = 44, 27%) patients presented for evaluation for Long COVID symptoms during the study period. There was a higher proportion of females with above median symptom score compared to males, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (78% vs 68%, *p* = 0.2). Thus, despite significantly more females in our sample, there was no contribution of biological sex to Symptom Score. Moreover, age (median= 44, IQR [35, 54]) and BMI (median = 30, IQR [26,36]) also failed to predict Symptom Score (*p* = 0.4, 0.7, respectively). Likely due to the geographic location of this study, most patients identified as Hispanic (53%). Yet, no race or ethnicity identified in this cohort were associated with Symptom Score (*p* = 0.8). ### Stress, anxiety, and satisfaction with life vary amongst Long COVID patients Given the high contribution of neuropsychiatric symptoms to Symptom Score and disease burden, we sought to determine if the additional psychiatric symptoms could predict Symptom Score. In a first, we administered validated screening tools to assess the presence and severity of stress rising to the level of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; PCL-5), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and general satisfaction with life (SWL). The categorical score results across these screening tools are summarized in Table 2. PCL-5 score revealed 44% of the sample lived with stress-related symptoms that rise to the level of PTSD. We were unable to analyze this finding considering the index (inciting) traumatic event, and thus cannot attribute symptoms to Long COVID symptoms or COVID-19 infection specifically. GAD-7 scores demonstrated 69% of Long COVID patients demonstrated at least mild anxiety symptoms with 18% affected by severe anxiety. Most (74%) patients screened for depression with PHQ-9 had symptoms characterized by at least mild depression with 28% experiencing moderately severe to severe symptoms. Of note, approximately 41% of the cohort was slightly to extremely dissatisfied with life. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/T2) Table 2. Categorical score results of screening tools for stress (PCL-5), anxiety (GAD-7), and depression (PHQ-9) symptoms, and satisfaction with life (SWL) in Long COVID patients. We then sought to determine if Symptom Score informed stress and anxiety levels in this cohort by calculating Spearman rank correlations between each measure (Fig 2). PCL-5, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 scores were all mutually associated. Symptom Score was positively associated with PCL-5 (r = 0.25, *p* < 0.05), GAD-7 (r = 0.29, *p* < 0.05), and PHQ-9 (r = 0.25, *p* < 0.05) scores. Thus, the more complex Long COVID symptomatology, the worse stress, anxiety and depression symptoms a patient reported. ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F2) Figure 2. Correlation of Symptom Score with measures of depression (PHQ-9), stress (PCL-5), and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms. We assessed whether PASC Symptom Scores were correlated with the presence of depression, stress, or anxiety symptomatology as determined by validated screening tools. Spearman rank correlations were computed for each pairwise combination of PASC Symptom Score and PCL-5 or GAD-7 scores. PHQ-9, PCL-5, and GAD-7 scores were mutually associated. PASC Symptom Score was positively associated with PHQ-9 (0.218, *p* < 0.05), GAD-7 (r = 0.29, *p* < 0.05) and PCL-5 (r = 0.25, *p* < 0.05). We refined this analysis to examine how each of the 20 items of the PCL-5 correlated with individual Long COVID symptoms that comprise the Symptom Score (Fig 3). Nearly all items on the PCL-5 were positively and significantly correlated with insomnia or sleep disturbance (17/20 items, *p* < 0.05). ![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F3) Figure 3. Correlation of individual PCL-5 items with Long COVID Symptoms. Spearman rank correlations were calculated for the intersection of the score of each item, reflecting frequency of stress and PSTD-related symptoms by item of the PCL-5 and the PASC symptoms used to calculate PASC Symptom Score. We contextualize the PCL-5 item scores with their respective symptom clusters for Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder according to the DSM-5, designated to the left of each PCL-5 item: Cluster B (The traumatic event is persistently experienced), Cluster C (Avoidance of trauma-related stimuli after trauma), Cluster D (Negative thoughts or feelings began or worsened after the trauma), Cluster E (Trama- related arousal and reactivity that began or worsened after the trauma. Correlations are given for all findings with *p* < 0.05. Importantly, individual item correlations do not vary by PTSD Symptom Cluster (B, C, D, E) as identified in the DSM-5. Headache (11/20 items, *p* < 0.05) and subjective cognitive impairment (9/20, *p* < 0.05) were also significantly positively correlated with many items. Of note, whether the patient was currently exercising at time of assessment was negatively correlated with 5 items (*p* < 0.05). The item most positively correlated with the greatest number of symptoms was item 8 *(p* < 0.05): “In the past month, how much were you bothered by: Trouble remembering important parts of the stressful experience?” ### Pharmacotherapy may moderate stress and anxiety-related Long COVID symptoms We sought to determine if any ongoing pharmacotherapy with Long COVID symptoms could explain the presence of stress and anxiety symptoms in our cohort. To this end, we correlated GAD-7 and PCL-5 scores with classes of medications reported taking at the time of Long COVID evaluation. Of note, 41% of patients take medications related to respiratory care well after initial COVID-19 infection (Table S1). Although PCL-5 and GAD-7 scores were positively and significantly correlated with mood stabilizers and stimulant prescriptions (Fig 4), Long COVID patients taking either class of medication had significantly higher GAD-7 scores compared to those not taking them (p = 0.031 and 0.035, respectively; Table 3), without significant differences in PCL-5 scores. ![Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/F4) Figure 4. Correlation of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and stress (PCL-5) symptomatology with current medications. Spearman rank correlations were calculated for the intersection of {HQ-9, GAD-7, and PCL-5 total scores with classes of current medications endorsed by self-report. Correlations are given for all findings with *p* < 0.05. View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669/T3) Table 3. Correlation of anxiety, stress, and depression symptomatology with mood stabilizer and stimulant class medications. ## Discussion Despite the best efforts of public health and medical systems, the COVID-19 pandemic remains a burden in much of the world, underscoring the need for further research into both the impact of acute infection and its associated infection-associated chronic condition, known as Long COVID(2–5). SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 and thus Long COVID, is neurotropic(20–23) and thus propagates throughout the central nervous system. The symptom clusters experienced by both acute COVID-19 and Long COVID patients imply significant distortions to normal functioning of nervous system. We hypothesized that chronic stress and mood disorders may significantly contribute to the complexity of Long COVID symptomatology, playing a key role in the abnormal neuro pathophysiology associated with the condition. To underscore the population affected, we emphasize the unique composition of our analytical sample, which is predominantly female (71%), Hispanic (53%), and obese (median BMI = 30). This highlights the relative share of Long COVID patients presenting for treatment in this region and emphasizes the high disease burden faced by this population. In this study, we present key findings and acknowledge limitations, aiming to encourage others to build on this work to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of Long COVID and drive the development of effective therapies and interventions. ### Symptom Score is an effective clinical tool for Long COVID evaluation and longitudinal tracking We characterized Long COVID symptoms in a cohort of patients who, due to the unique nature of our study site in South Texas, represented categories of patients thought to be a greatest risk(4,14,15,18) for severe COVID-19 infection and thus Long COVID (N = 162; 71% female, 53% Hispanic, median BMI = 30). We used the Symptom Score to correlate burden and complexity of multisystemic Long COVID symptomatology, which demonstrated clustering of symptoms that is highly consistent with larger and more detailed inventories of Long COVID symptoms from previous studies. Our findings align with those of large cohort studies(9,11,12) and reveal a high burden of fatigue, cognitive impairment, and anxiety among Long COVID patients, exacerbating the core Long COVID symptom profile. The significant impact on quality of life and the increased risk of worsening psychiatric disorders in Long COVID(24,25) underscore the need for greater attention to neuropsychiatric symptoms in the management of Long COVID. Thus, we advance the Long COVID Symptom Score as an effective inventory or core symptoms across several major systems (e.g., cognitive, respiratory, neuropsychiatric, pain, and constitutive/gastrointestinal symptoms) for use in clinical settings that benefit from rapid screening tools. The Symptom Score may also assist with triaging patients for additional tests to detect neurovascular changes(26), neuroinflammation(27,28), and structural alterations(29–31) in patients with Long COVID. ### Psychiatric comorbidity is more predictive of Long COVID severity than patient factors We found that comorbid stress and anxiety symptomatology as measured by PCL-5 and GAD-7 inventories was more predictive of Long COVID symptomatology than any patient factor considered in this study. Nonetheless, it is difficult to attribute stress, anxiety, or satisfaction with life measures specifically to COVID-19 infection or chronic Long COVID symptomatology without knowledge of any index or inciting traumatic events. We also identified patients with premorbid anxiety disorders, who were not excluded from this study based on the original criteria, that may serve as a refined subgroup for future analyses on changes in anxiety levels attributable to neuropsychiatric burden in Long COVID. We anticipate this may be a difficult confounding factor to address, given the general stress and anxiety levels induced by the global COVID-19 pandemic at the time of study recruitment. Future studies should include validated screening tools to enable quantification and thus more objective assessment of neuropsychiatric burden in Long COVID patients. This may aid the tracking of symptom progression over time. One gap in this study was access to an inventory to characterize symptoms related to the patient-reported cognitive impairment reported by 73% of our cohort at time of assessment. A standardized tool to assess specific features of cognitive impairments in this and other populations could point to underlying neurobiological pathways or circuitry that is particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 infection or chronic damage related to Long COVID. ### Some study interpretations limited due to study setting The results of this study highlight considerations of stress and anxiety in Long COVID patients. Importantly, we cannot rule out the impact of greater socioeconomic stressors experienced by historically marginalized groups on Long COVID Symptom Score, nor any measure of stress and anxiety used here. Our results reflect patient status captured within a single visit to a Rehabilitation Medicine clinic and thus would likely benefit from long-term follow-up with increased sample size. ## Materials and Methods This study was conducted under the approval of the Office of the Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Long School of Medicine (protocol #20210194EX). Participants in this retrospective cohort study were men and women who were evaluated in a Rehabilitation Medicine outpatient clinic in South Texas from January 2020 to July 2021. The study setting was an outpatient physiatry clinic in which each participant was evaluated, in a private room, by clinicians for Long COVID symptomatology and administered screening tools for stress, anxiety, and quality of life measures. The data was retrospectively collected directly from the medical chart in the University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center’s Electronic Medical Record (EPIC). Responses were recorded directly into RedCap and then aggregated in a de-identified database for statistical analysis. ### Analytical Population Eligible participants included patients over the age of 18 years old with a history of acute COVID-19 infection confirmed either by positive COVID-19 test (89%) or evaluation by a clinician for COVID-19 symptoms. Patients were seen at varying periods post-COVID-19 infection. Participants were ineligible if they were younger than 18 years old, did not have a history of acute COVID-19 infection, were evaluated for conditions apart from Long COVID, or were unable to read or speak in English to complete screening tools and clinical evaluation. During the study period, 235 patients were clinically evaluated. In our analysis, we excluded patients who either did not complete the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version 5 (PCL-5), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7), or Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Patients were not excluded from analysis if they were missing information on other patient factors or screening tools. We excluded these individuals from some sub-analyses (“Missing”), as noted throughout this report. The final analytical sample included 162 patients. These screening tools are outlined in detail below. ### Patient Factors In addition to the above outlined measures, we also collected patient factors for use as covariates in this study (Table 1). Patient factors included biological sex, ethnicity/race, age, education level, body mass index (BMI), pre-existing psychiatric disorders, current medication list, type of health care institution, region, and employment status. ### Long COVID Symptom Score We collected self-reported Long COVID symptomatology noted in the medical record from a single clinical evaluation of Long COVID symptoms(9,11) from all participants. Long COVID symptoms included: (1) positive COVID-19 test at the time of primary infection, (2) fatigue, (3) coughing or shortness of breath (SOB), (4) muscle or joint ache, (5) headache, (6) increased time spent in bed, (7) fever, (8) loss of smell, (9) loss of taste, (10) cognitive impairment, (11) insomnia or sleep disturbance, (12) weight loss, (13) diarrhea, (14) nausea or vomiting, (15) rash, (16) currently exercising. For our analysis, we then operationalized Long COVID symptoms and calculated a Symptom Score based on the total number of symptoms reported during clinical evaluation. We also evaluated factors thought to affect PASC symptom severity, such as the amount of elapsed time from Long COVID evaluation to initial acute COVID-19 infection, whether the patient was hospitalized, required ventilation or supplemental oxygen, or experienced cardiac damage because of primary infection. ### Stress and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Assessment (PCL-5) Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Check List for DSM-5 (PCL-5(32,33)) was used to assess stress and trauma-related symptoms. The PCL-5 was adapted for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and demonstrated strong reliability and validity(34). The PCL-5 is a 20-item inventory designed to gauge symptoms based on 4 major PTSD symptom clusters: Cluster B (The traumatic event is persistently experienced), Cluster C (Avoidance of trauma-related stimuli after trauma), Cluster D (Negative thoughts or feelings began or worsened after the trauma), Cluster E (Trama-related arousal and reactivity that began or worsened after the trauma. Participants rated the degree to which they experienced each symptom on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), with possible scores ranging from 17 to 85. Cut scores range from 30 to 60 depending on the variation and base rate of the disorder in the population and settings, and it is recommended to use higher cut-offs in populations with higher base rates, such as veterans, and lower cut scores with populations of lower base rates of PTSD(35). A total score of 31-33 suggests a diagnosis of PTSD and that the patient may benefit from PTSD treatment. ### Anxiety Assessment (GAD-7) We used the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7(36)) to evaluate patients for presence and severity of anxiety. The GAD-7 is a self-report seven item questionnaire assessing symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder that has been found to have validity as a measure of anxiety in the general population(37). In this study, the GAD-7 was altered to reflect symptomatology within the time frame of the past month to match the frame of reference for other screening tools used in this study. GAD-7 scores were used to assign patients into standard categories based on anxiety-related symptoms: 0-4 = minimal anxiety, 5-9 = mild anxiety, 10-14 = moderate anxiety, 15-21 = severe anxiety. ### Depression Assessment (PHQ-9) We used the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9(38)) to evaluate patients for presence and severity of depression. The PHQ-9 has a cut score of 6 that has been recommended for depression screening in primary care and a score of 10 or higher is used to detect symptoms of major depressive disorder(39). ### Satisfaction with Life Assessment The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS(40)) is a five item self-report Likert scale (“strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”) to measure satisfaction with life as a proxy for subjective well-being. Past studies have established adequate reliability and predictive validity in a wide range of age groups(41). We analyzed patients who fell within the following categorical score ranges: ### Statistical Analysis We used open-source statistical software (R version 4.3+, Vienna, Austria) to complete all statistical analyses in this study. Patient factors were tested for associations with Symptom Score by stratifying participants as above or below the median symptom score and using the Wilcoxon rank sum test (continuous variables) or Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables). Medication use for each category was used as a predictor within linear regression models for each outcome (PCL-5, GAD-7, PHQ-9, and Symptom Score). Spearman’s correlations were used to identify associations amongst these outcomes. All testing was two-sided (α = 0.05). ## Supporting information Supplemental [[supplements/316669_file03.docx]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ## Author Contributions SR, MVG, BRR, GGL, PB, MD, AMW and SG conceived the project, generated hypotheses, and supplied patient records for data collection. SR completed the application for IRB approval. JG, MG, SR, MVG, BRR, and AMW performed the data analysis. AMW wrote the manuscript. SR, MVG, AMW, JG, and DM revised and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript for submission. ## Funding The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grants UM1 TR004538 (JAG, MG). Training for AMW was supported by F30MH134482, T32R004545, STX-MSTP (T32GM113896 / T32GM145432), T32NS082145, R25NS089462. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. ## Compliance with Ethical Standards The authors have no disclosures. ## Acknowledgements This was a study completed by the interdisciplinary collaborations of the South Texas Psychiatry Practice- Based Research Network (PBRN). We would like to express our gratitude to the patients who entrusted our team with the data for this study. Our also extend our sincere gratitude to the many students who performed data collection and contributed to the development of poster presentations of this study (Anne Marie Wells, Richa Sinkre, Ashley Chakales, Sean Rumney, and Phillip Yang). Finally, we thank the South Texas Psychiatry PBRN staff, especially Kaitlyn Waxler, for their persistence and keeping the study organized. * Received November 3, 2024. * Revision received November 3, 2024. * Accepted November 4, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing – 5 May 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 1]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing](https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing) 5-may-2023 2. 2.Meyerowitz EA, Scott J, Richterman A, Male V, Cevik M. Clinical course and management of COVID-19 in the era of widespread population immunity. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2023 22:2 [Internet]. 2023 Dec 19 [cited 2024 Aug 1];22(2):75–88. Available from: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-023-01001-1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-023-01001-1) 3. 3.Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (COVID-19). StatPearls [Internet]. 2023 Aug 18 [cited 2024 Aug 1]; Available from: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554776/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554776/) 4. 4.Groff D, Sun A, Ssentongo AE, Ba DM, Parsons N, Poudel GR, et al. Short-term and Long-term Rates of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2021 Oct 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];4(10):e2128568–e2128568. Available from: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2784918](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2784918) 5. 5.Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, Levitan EB, Levy B, McComsey GA, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA [Internet]. 2023 Jun 13 [cited 2024 Aug 1];329(22):1934–46. Available from: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2805540](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2805540) 6. 6.National Academies of Sciences E and M. A Long COVID Definition: A Chronic, Systemic Disease State with Profound Consequences. A Long COVID Definition. 2024 Jun 11; 7. 7.Reese JT, Blau H, Casiraghi E, Bergquist T, Loomba JJ, Callahan TJ, et al. Generalisable long COVID subtypes: Findings from the NIH N3C and RECOVER programmes. EBioMedicine [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];87:104413. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9769411/ 8. 8.Danesh V, Arroliga AC, Bourgeois JA, Boehm LM, McNeal MJ, Widmer AJ, et al. Symptom Clusters Seen in Adult COVID-19 Recovery Clinic Care Seekers. J Gen Intern Med [Internet]. 2023 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];38(2):442. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9663188/ 9. 9.Cai M, Xie Y, Topol EJ, Al-Aly Z. Three-year outcomes of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Nature Medicine 2024 30:6 [Internet]. 2024 May 30 [cited 2024 Aug 1];30(6):1564–73. Available from: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02987-8](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02987-8) 10. 10.Bell ML, Catalfamo CJ, Farland L V., Ernst KC, Jacobs ET, Klimentidis YC, et al. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in a non-hospitalized cohort: Results from the Arizona CoVHORT. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];16(8):e0254347. Available from: [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254347](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254347) 11. 11.Bowe B, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z. Postacute sequelae of COVID-19 at 2 years. Nature Medicine 2023 29:9 [Internet]. 2023 Aug 21 [cited 2024 Aug 1];29(9):2347–57. Available from: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02521-2](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02521-2) 12. 12.Peter RS, Nieters A, Kräusslich HG, Brockmann SO, Göpel S, Kindle G, et al. Post-acute sequelae of covid-19 six to 12 months after infection: population based study. BMJ [Internet]. 2022 Oct 13 [cited 2024 Aug 1];379. Available from: [https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj-2022-071050](https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj-2022-071050) 13. 13.Cutler DM. The Costs of Long COVID. JAMA Health Forum [Internet]. 2022 May 12 [cited 2024 Aug 1];3(5). Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36219031/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36219031/) 14. 14.Wang C, Ramasamy A, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Brode WM, Melamed E. Acute and post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review of risk factors and social determinants. Virol J [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];20(1):1–11. Available from: [https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-023-02061-8](https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-023-02061-8) 15. 15.Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol [Internet]. 2023 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];21(3):133–46. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36639608/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36639608/) 16. 16.Estrada L V., Levasseur JL, Maxim A, Benavidez GA, Porter KMP. Structural Racism, Place, and COVID-19: A Narrative Review Describing How We Prepare for an Endemic COVID-19 Future. Health Equity [Internet]. 2022 May 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];6(1):356. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9148659/ 17. 17.Kantamneni N. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2020 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];119:103439. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7205696/ 18. 18.Munipalli B, Ma Y, Li Z, Ganesh R, Knight D, Logvinov II, et al. Risk factors for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: Survey results from a tertiary care hospital. 101177/10815589231190560 [Internet]. 2023 Aug 12 [cited 2024 Aug 1];71(8):896–906. Available from: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/10815589231190560](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/10815589231190560) 19. 19.Hu W, Tang R, Gong S, Liu J, Li J, Liao C. The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Post- COVID-19 Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 Jul 2 [cited 2024 Aug 1];16(7). Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39092372/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39092372/) 20. 20.Roy D, Ghosh R, Dubey S, Dubey MJ, Benito-Leon J, Kanti Ray B. Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic. Can J Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];48(1):9–24. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32753076/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32753076/) 21. 21.Song WJ, Hui CKM, Hull JH, Birring SS, McGarvey L, Mazzone SB, et al. Confronting COVID-19- associated cough and the post-COVID syndrome: role of viral neurotropism, neuroinflammation, and neuroimmune responses. Lancet Respir Med [Internet]. 2021 May 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];9(5):533–44. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33857435/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33857435/) 22. 22.Sarubbo F, El Haji K, Vidal-Balle A, Bargay Lleonart J. Neurological consequences of COVID-19 and brain related pathogenic mechanisms: A new challenge for neuroscience. Brain Behav Immun Health [Internet]. 2022 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];19. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8629776/ 23. 23.Singh D, Singh E. An overview of the neurological aspects in COVID-19 infection. J Chem Neuroanat [Internet]. 2022 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];122:102101. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9008979/ 24. 24.Coleman B, Casiraghi E, Callahan TJ, Blau H, Chan LE, Laraway B, et al. Association of post- COVID phenotypic manifestations with new-onset psychiatric disease. Translational Psychiatry 2024 14:1 [Internet]. 2024 Jun 8 [cited 2024 Aug 1];14(1):1–9. Available from: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-024-02967-z](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-024-02967-z) 25. 25.Paez AF, Nicolalde B, Esquetini-Vernon C, Lara-Taranchenko Y, Zambrano K, Ocampo J, et al. Psychiatric disorders in Post-acute COVID-syndrome (PDPACS): Recommendations for health care professionals. European Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2022 May 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];58:100. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8956896/ 26. 26.Ajčević M, Iscra K, Furlanis G, Michelutti M, Miladinović A, Buoite Stella A, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion in post-COVID-19 cognitively impaired subjects revealed by arterial spin labeling MRI. Scientific Reports 2023 13:1 [Internet]. 2023 Apr 10 [cited 2024 Aug 21];13(1):1–9. Available from: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-32275-3](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-32275-3) 27. 27.Braga J, Lepra M, Kish SJ, Rusjan PM, Nasser Z, Verhoeff N, et al. Neuroinflammation After COVID-19 With Persistent Depressive and Cognitive Symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];80(8):787–95. Available from: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2805366](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2805366) 28. 28.VanElzakker MB, Bues HF, Brusaferri L, Kim M, Saadi D, Ratai EM, et al. Neuroinflammation in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) as assessed by [11C]PBR28 PET correlates with vascular disease measures. Brain Behav Immun [Internet]. 2024 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];119:713. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC11225883/ 29. 29.Cecchetti G, Agosta F, Canu E, Basaia S, Barbieri A, Cardamone R, et al. Cognitive, EEG, and MRI features of COVID-19 survivors: a 10-month study. J Neurol [Internet]. 2022 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Aug 21];269(7):3400–12. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35249144/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35249144/) 30. 30.Chen B, Chen C, Zheng J, Li R, Xu J. Insights Into Neuroimaging Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Presenting With Neurological Manifestations. Front Neurol [Internet]. 2020 Nov 9 [cited 2024 Aug 21];11:593520. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7680864/ 31. 31.Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang D, Zhao W, Zeng M, Xie X, et al. Persistent white matter changes in recovered COVID-19 patients at the 1-year follow-up. Brain [Internet]. 2022 Jun 3 [cited 2024 Aug 21];145(5):1830–8. Available from: doi:10.1093/brain/awab435 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awab435&link_type=DOI) 32. 32.Weathers FW, LBT, KTM, PPA, MBP, & SPP. [www.ptsd.va.gov](https://www.ptsd.va.gov). 2013. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). 33. 33.Forkus SR, Raudales AM, Rafiuddin HS, Weiss NH, Messman BA, Contractor AA. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM–5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence. Clin Psychol (New York) [Internet]. 2023 Sep 8 [cited 2024 Aug 1];30(1):110. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC10292741/ 34. 34.Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress [Internet]. 2015 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];28(6):489–98. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26606250/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26606250/) 35. 35.McDonald SD, Calhoun PS. The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD checklist: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2010 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 1];30(8):976–87. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20705376/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20705376/) 36. 36.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 2006 May 22 [cited 2024 Aug 1];166(10):1092–7. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16717171/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16717171/) 37. 37.Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, et al. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care [Internet]. 2008 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 1];46(3):266–74. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18388841/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18388841/) 38. 38.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA [Internet]. 1999 Nov 10 [cited 2024 Aug 21];282(18):1737–44. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10568646/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10568646/) 39. 39.Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, Gunn J, Kerse N, Fishman T, et al. Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. Ann Fam Med [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2024 Aug 21];8(4):348–53. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20644190/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20644190/) 40. 40.Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsem RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess [Internet]. 1985 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 1];49(1):71–5. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16367493/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16367493/) 41. 41.Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2024 Aug 1];57(1):149–61. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1920028/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1920028/)