Abstract
Online, remote neuropsychological assessment paradigms may offer a cost-effective alternative to in-person assessment for people who experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD). However, it is vital to establish the psychometric properties of such paradigms. The present study (i) evaluates test-retest reliability of remote, online neuropsychological tests from the NeurOn software platform in people with and without SCD (Non-SCD) recruited from the general population; and (ii) investigates potential group differences in baseline performance and longitudinal change. Ninety-nine participants (SCD N = 44, Non-SCD N = 55) completed seven tests from the NeurOn battery, covering visual and verbal memory, working memory, attention and psychomotor speed. Sixty-nine participants (SCD N = 34, Non-SCD N = 35) repeated the assessment six (+/-one) months later. SCD was classified using the Cognitive Change Index questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of the NeurOn test outcome measures ranged from poor to good, with the strongest evidence of reliability shown for the Sustained Attention to Response Test and Picture Recognition. The SCD group was significantly older than the Non-SCD group so group differences were investigated using analysis of covariance whilst controlling for the effect of age. SCD scored significantly better than Non-SCD for Digit Span Backwards (maximum sequence length) and Picture Recognition (recall of object position) at baseline. However, these were not significant when using the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level. There were no differences between SCD and Non-SCD in longitudinal change. The results suggest online, remote neuropsychological assessment is a promising option for assessing and monitoring SCD.
Author summary A considerable proportion of the older adult population experiences subjective decline in their thinking skills even though they score within ‘normal’ limits on screening tests for mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Research suggests that, for a small percentage of these people, their experience of a decline in their thinking skills might indicate an early stage of dementia. It is important for research to identify the earliest markers of dementia as this is when treatments may be most effective. By harnessing computing technology to improve on the accuracy and availability of cognitive assessments, we may be able to identify early and subtle cognitive changes caused by dementia. This study investigated whether online and remote cognitive assessment is a reliable method to assess and monitor thinking skills in the general older adult population. We were able to identify tasks which showed the best evidence for reliability when completed online and remotely by people with and without a subjective experience of cognitive decline, and therefore may be appropriate for monitoring thinking skills in people who are concerned about their cognitive ability. Our findings suggest online cognitive assessment may be a useful and cost-effective alternative to in-person clinic-based assessment.
Competing Interest Statement
Professor Michael Hornberger is the research director at NeurOn
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of East Anglia Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Subcommittee (ETH2223-0113).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of the current research are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
