Abstract
Background Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective in people living with HIV (PLHIV), but its success depends on treatment satisfaction and adherence. A determinant of satisfaction regards how the medication is delivered to the patient, namely how it is contained (e.g., bottles, blisters, etc). A new packaging of Biktarvy® has been introduced as a monthly blister, aiming to improve satisfaction, facilitate traceability of daily medication, portability, and discretion (reducing stigma associated with ART), and, ultimately, enhance adherence.
Goals The study’s objective was to assess the impact of changing the packaging of Biktarvy® (B/F/TAF) from a standard pill bottle to a monthly blister with a weekly calendar on therapy satisfaction. Additionally, the association between treatment satisfaction and selected patients’ characteristics (e.g., ART duration) was evaluated. A secondary goal was to characterize the association between the change of packaging on patient’s adherence.
Methods This is an observational longitudinal (retrospective and prospective) study with patients following ART for at least six months (ambulatory clinical management) recruited according to a non-probabilistic sequential sampling. Satisfaction was measured at two different moments: at baseline, HIVTSQs were used to assess satisfaction within the previous six months’ use of medication containers (bottles). Six months later, patients filled in the HIVTSQc to assess their perception of satisfaction change with the new packaging (blister). Adherence was assessed by pharmacy medication dispensing at the hospital.
Results The study enrolled 105 patients in two selected centers (102 patients completed the study). Patients were significantly more satisfied (HIVTSQc scores) with ART when using the new Biktarvy® blister pack package. Importantly, gains of ART satisfaction were higher among those less satisfied with the bottle packaging. No significant associations were found between HIVTSQc scores and sociodemographic or ART-related variables.
Competing Interest Statement
Conflict of interests The authors declare no conflict of interest, except for Maria Pinto da Silva who is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Lda., Lisboa, Portugal, and owns shares in Gilead.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board Statement The study was conducted in accordance with the clinical study protocol (CSP), the International Council for Harmonization, Good Clinical Practices, and the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as the applicable European and Portuguese laws and regulations approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa (reference number 226/22).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.