Abstract
Researchers are increasingly studying cognitive and psychological constructs using automated online tools due to advantages in scalability, repeatability, accessibility and affordability. The online assessment of sleep presents a challenge, as the most popular instruments for reporting different aspects of sleep were originally designed to be deployed under supervised conditions by trained personnel. Here, we develop and validate the Comprehensive Online Sleep Monitoring Scale (COSMOS), a self-reported sleep scale optimised for online, independent administration. Using data from N = 5,815 adults, we show that COSMOS has good internal (Cronbach’s α = 0.85) and convergent validity, via strong associations with established sleep scales. Poorer COSMOS sleep scores were found in participants diagnosed with psychological conditions, more frequent depression or anxiety symptoms, and higher compulsivity or neuroticism traits, demonstrating good construct validity. We propose COSMOS as a comprehensive and validated sleep assessment that is suitable for large-scale online transdiagnostic and mental health research.
Competing Interest Statement
SRC, KI and SW receive honoraria for editorial work at Elsevier journals. LR, SW, SS, KVA and AH receive support from Boehringer-Ingelheim for research independent of this study. AH is founder and director of Future Cognition Ltd and co-founder and co-director of H2CD Ltd, which respectively develop custom online cognitive assessment software and provide online cognitive assessment services for academic, industry and healthcare sectors. PH is co-owner and co-director of H2 Cognitive Designs LTD and reports personal fees from H2 Cognitive Designs LTD outside the submitted work. WT is an employee of H2 Cognitive Designs, the company that owns the Cognitron software. VG is supported by the Medical Research Council, MR/W00710X/1. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This project was approved by the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (17IC4009). Full informed electronic consent was obtained from participants prior to completing this study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data can be made available upon reasonable request to the authors.
