ABSTRACT
Background Poor nurse wellbeing is a significant concern, adversely affecting patient care quality and satisfaction, contributing to poor job satisfaction, increased sickness absence and workforce retention issues. There are calls for evidence-based policies and interventions to address poor nurse wellbeing, but no consensus exists on how it should be captured and measured. We used a salutogenic and consensus approach to develop a core outcome set (COS) for capturing and measuring nurse wellbeing.
Methods A Delphi methodology was employed. Participants were recruited from two stakeholder groups: 1) nurse wellbeing professionals, identified through relevant publications, conference/meeting attendance lists, and peer recommendations, and 2) Registered Nurses, recruited via social media, professional nursing bodies, and practitioner networks. The stakeholder panel completed two rounds of an online Delphi survey, rating 43 previously identified wellbeing outcomes on a nine-point Likert Scale, from ‘not important’ to ‘critical’. Consensus was defined as >75% of stakeholders agreeing a wellbeing outcome was critical for inclusion in the COS.
Results Fifty-four stakeholders completed the first Delphi Round, and 45 participated in both rounds. Thirteen wellbeing outcomes met the a-priori threshold for inclusion in the COS: General Wellbeing, Health, Sleep, Positive Relationships, Personal Safety, Psychological Needs Satisfaction, Psychological Safety, Job Satisfaction, Morale, Life Work Balance, Compassion Satisfaction, Satisfaction with Patient Care, and Good Nursing Practice. The final COS was agreed by the stakeholder panel, without amendments.
Conclusion This study establishes a COS for capturing and measuring nurse wellbeing. Implementing this COS has the potential to enable consistent data collection and evidence synthesis needed to support the development of nurse wellbeing strategies, policies and interventions. Future research will focus on identifying valid and reliable measurement tools.
Trial Registration This study was prospectively registered with the COMET initiative www.comet-initiative.org (Registration: 2433)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2433
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex (ARC Wessex).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Faculty Ethics Committee (Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences) of the University of Southampton gave ethical approval for this work (ERGO 78343).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
