Abstract
Background The German electronic health record (EHR) aims to enhance patient care and reduce costs, but users often worry about data security. To mitigate disease-related privacy concerns, for instance, surrounding stigmatized diseases, we test the effect of privacy fact sheets (PFS) - a concise but comprehensive transparency feature - on increasing EHR usage.
Objective We investigate whether displaying a PFS shortly before upload decisions must be made mitigates disease-related privacy concerns and makes uploads more likely.
Methods In an online user study, 393 German participants interacted with a randomly assigned medical report that varied systematically in terms of disease-related stigma (high vs. low) and time course (acute vs. chronic). They were then asked to decide whether to upload the report to the EHR, while we systematically varied the presentation of privacy information (PFS vs. no PFS).
Results The results show that, in general, upload behavior is negatively influenced by disease-related stigma (OR 0.130, p<.001) and positively influenced when a PFS is given (OR 4.527, p<.001). This increase was particularly pronounced for stigmatized diseases (OR 5.952, p=.006). Time course of diseases had no effect.
Conclusions Our results demonstrate that PFSs help to increase EHR uploads by mitigating privacy concerns related to stigmatized diseases. This indicates that a PFS is mainly relevant and effective for users with increased privacy risk perceptions, while they do not hurt other users. Thus, implementing PFSs can increase the likelihood that more patients, even those with increased privacy concerns due to stigmatized diseases, upload their data to the EHR, ultimately increasing health equity. That is, PFS may help to realize EHR benefits such as more efficient healthcare processes, improved treatment outcomes, and reduced costs for more users.
Trial Registration Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00033652, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033652
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
DRKS00033652
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the Institute of Psychology and Ergnonomics of the Technical University Berlin gave ethical approval for this work (tracking number: AWB_KAL_1_230206_Erweiterungsantrag)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Co-author: Prof. Dr. Markus A. Feufel, Division of Ergonomics, Department of Psychology and Ergonomics (IPA), Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany, Email: markus.feufel{at}tu-berlin.de, Telephone: +49 (0)30 314 73773
More clearly descriptions regarding the background of the German EHR, an updated power analysis for sample computing and updated supplementary material.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- CONSORT
- Consolidated standards of reporting trials
- EHR
- Electronic health record
- IoT
- Internet of things
- IV
- Independent variable mHealth Mobile health
- OR
- Odds ratio
- PFS
- Privacy fact sheet
- SD
- Standard deviation
- SNS
- Social network site
- SP
- Stigmatization potential
- STD
- Sexually transmitted disease
- TC
- Time course
