Abstract
We compared the performance of two multiplex platforms, Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel® and TaqMan Array Card, against a panel of 14 enteric pathogen targets in a community-based birth cohort in Ecuador. We found high levels of agreement and similar prevalence estimates across most pathogens.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01A137679 to KL and JNSE, R01AI162867 to BFA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was reviewed and approved by institutional review boards at University of Washington (#STUDY00014270), Emory University (#IRB00101202), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (#2018-022M), and University of California, San Francisco (#21-33932), and all participants provided informed consent, with re-consent for each stool sample collection.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We moved more material into the main text figures/tables, and corrected a single mis-count of the number of targets with discordance (v1 incorrectly listed 6, when there were 5 targets with McNemar's P<0.05).