Abstract
Background Electronic health record (EHR) data are widely used in public health research, including HIV-related studies, but are limited by potential bias due to incomplete and inaccurate information, lack of generalizability, and lack of representativeness. This study explores how workflow processes within HIV clinics, among data scientists, and within state health departments may introduce and minimize bias within EHRs.
Methods Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, in-depth individual interviews were conducted with 16 participants purposively sampled in South Carolina from August 2023-April 2024. A focus group with 3 health department professionals with expertise in HIV disease surveillance was also conducted. Analysis was conducted as outlined by Charmaz (2006).
Results To reduce bias in EHR data, information entry forms should be designed to expansively include patient self-reported social determinants of health (SDOH) information. During data collection, healthcare providers should create a supportive healthcare environment, facilitate SDOH information disclosure, and accurately document patient information. Patients should have access to their EHRs to confirm that SDOH information are correctly recorded. During data curation, data scientists should inspect datasets for completeness, accuracy, and educate public health researchers on dataset limitations. During data management and utilization, health department professionals should crossmatch data across the state, customize data collection systems to reflect local needs, and provide community-based data education and stigma management.
Conclusion Study results suggest that future research is needed to understand how healthcare systems can be incentivized to create and implement EHR bias reduction strategies across all workflows and between stakeholders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the NIH/ NIAID (R01AI164947-0A1S01).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB at the University of South Carolina gave ethical approval for this work. Application No.: Pro00122501
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
