Abstract
Aim To describe the protocol for a systematic review of etiology and risk to identify the etiological factors of Risk for Occupational Illness in nursing professionals.
Design Etiology and risk review protocol, conducted according to JBI guidelines.
Methods This is an etiology and risk review protocol to be carried out following the JBI guidelines in the following data sources: CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, National Institute of Security and Health at Work and National Institute of Health at Work. The inclusion criteria are studies that address workers aged 18 years until retirement, demonstrate etiological factors that condition the susceptibility of the ND in question and address analyses regarding the identification, definition and association of factors with the Risk of Occupational Illness. The exclusion criteria are studies that did not address the topic, opinion articles, letters to the editor and editorials.
Expected Results The results of this review will be publicly disclosed in scientific journals in the health area and will contribute to increasing the level of evidence of the Nursing Diagnosis Risk for Occupational Illness, so that they remain in future editions of NANDA International and that the diagnosis is updated and revised based on the current scientific literature.
Conclusion It is expected identify the possible uses of the concept; determine the essential critical attributes; identify the antecedents and consequences of the concept; and define the empirical references and to highlight the etiological factors that are consistent with susceptibility to occupational illness.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study will review the scientific literature on the etiological factors of Risk for Occupational Illness in nursing professionals, providing an increase in the level of evidence for this Diagnosis;
The steps of this review will be followed strictly in accordance with the criteria of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis;
To avoid selection bias, data collection will occur independently with active blinding of researchers, who will use software to export and select data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
