Abstract
Background Total hip arthroplasty enhances quality of life by improving joint function. However, the success of this procedure heavily relies on precise acetabular cup positioning, which is insufficient using traditional placement guidelines. This insufficiency is evidenced by the persistent occurrence of dislocations, highlighting the critical need for enhanced pelvic alignment accuracy. Standard surgical tables present challenges in maintaining consistent pelvic positioning during the procedure, making it difficult to achieve optimal alignment.
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a traction surgical table in stabilizing pelvic movements during total hip arthroplasty and compare it with the use of a standard surgical table.
Methods This retrospective study assessed 88 total hip arthroplasties performed using the AR-HIP (Zimmer Biomet Japan, Tokyo, Japan) system for real-time pelvic navigation. Procedures were performed using either a standard surgical table (n=48) or a traction surgical table (n=40). Pelvic alignment was monitored at multiple surgical stages, and stability was statistically analyzed to compare the efficacy of the two table types.
Results The traction table significantly stabilized anteroposterior pelvic movements across all critical surgical stages (p<0.05), except during anterior capsular release. In contrast, procedures performed on the standard table exhibited less stability in anteroposterior pelvic movements, suggesting the superior performance of the traction table.
Conclusions Compared with the standard table, the use of the traction table in total hip arthroplasty effectively controls anteroposterior pelvic movements and improves acetabular cup alignment. However, lateral pelvic stability remains uncontrolled using both table types, indicating a need for further technological advancements in surgical practice to improve the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The need for ethics approval was waived by the Medical Ethics Committee of Kanazawa University according to the "Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects" provided by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The data were accessed on 20th February, 2024 for research purposes. The authors did not have access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection. Confidentiality and anonymity were ensured, and participants were informed of their right to withdraw at any time.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
