Abstract
Background Protein abundance levels, sensitive to both physiological changes and external interventions, are useful for assessing the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk and treatment efficacy. However, identifying proteomic prognostic markers for AD is challenging by their high dimensionality and inherent correlations.
Methods Our study analyzed 1128 plasma proteins, measured by the SOMAscan platform, from 858 participants 55 years and older (mean age 63 years, 52.9% women) of the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring cohort. We conducted regression analysis and machine learning models, including LASSO-based Cox proportional hazard regression model (LASSO) and generalized boosted regression model (GBM), to identify protein prognostic markers. These markers were used to construct a weighted proteomic composite score, the AD prediction performance of which was assessed using time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). The association between the composite score and memory domain was examined in 339 (of the 858) participants with available memory scores, and in an independent group of 430 participants younger than 55 years (mean age 46, 56.7% women).
Results Over a mean follow-up of 20 years, 132 (15.4%) participants developed AD. After adjusting for baseline age, sex, education, and APOE ε4+ status, regression models identified 309 proteins (P ≤ 0.2). After applying machine learning methods, nine of these proteins were selected to develop a composite score. This score improved AD prediction beyond the factors of age, sex, education, and APOE ε4+ status across 15 to 25 years of follow-up, achieving its peak AUC of 0.84 in the LASSO model at the 22-year follow-up. It also showed a consistent negative association with memory scores in 339 participants (beta = -0.061, P = 0.046), 430 independent participants (beta = -0.060, P = 0.018), and the pooled 769 samples (beta = -0.058, P = 0.003).
Conclusion These findings highlight the utility of proteomic markers in improving AD prediction and emphasize the complex pathology of AD. The composite score may aid early AD detection and efficacy monitoring, warranting further validation in diverse populations.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Au is a scientific advisor to Signant Health and NovoNordisk and a consultant to the Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative. Dr. Doraiswamy has received research grants, advisory/board fees, and/or stock from several companies and is a co-inventor of several patents related to the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. The other authors state that this study was carried out without any commercial or financial affiliations that might be seen as a possible conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
Data collection for FHS was supported by N01-HC-25195, HHSN268201500001, and by grants (R01AG059727, R01AG016495, R01AG008122, RF1AG062109, U19 AG068753) from the National Institute on Aging.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All participants provided their written consent for genetic studies. The study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Boards at Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The study adhered strictly to regulations and guidelines to ensure compliance.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data could be requested through an application to the FHS.
