Abstract
Background Dysphagia is an important factor affecting aspiration pneumonia in the elderly, which will greatly increase the risk of poor prognosis and even death. Early detection, diagnosis and effective prevention are the key to improve the prognosis of patients. However, there is currently no systematic tool for screening and evaluating swallowing disorders in the elderly.
Objective This study aimed to establish an index system for the screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the elderly, and to provide evidence for the screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the community and clinic.
Methods The draft of the index system was determined based on the combination of literature review and clinical practice. The Delphi method was applied to conduct expert correspondence consultation, and the index system for screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the elderly was established. The weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process.
Results A total of 19 experts in related fields were consulted for 3 rounds. The questionnaire recovery rates were 94.7%, 100% and 100%, respectively. 17 (89.5%), 14 (73.7%) and 5 (26.3%) experts put forward modification opinions, respectively. The expert authority coefficient was 0.920, and the Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.219, 0.261 and 0.306, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.001). Finally, the index system for the screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the elderly includes 3 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 26 third-level indicators.
Conclusion The experts in this study are highly motivated and authoritative, and the established index system for the screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the elderly is scientific, reasonable and targeted, which can provide reference for the screening and evaluation of dysphagia in the community and clinical elderly patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital . Ethics review number S2023-421-01
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
First author: Li Gaoqiang, Nurse, Master candidate, Geriatric Nursing, Wound Nursing, 305813533{at}qq.com,18811179801
Fund Project: Military logistics support Department health Bureau, surface project (Project number: 21BJZ22)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
