ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Online assessments are scalable and cost-effective for detecting cognitive changes, especially in elderly cohorts with limited mobility and higher vulnerability to neurological conditions. However, determining the uptake, adherence, and usability of these assessments in older adults, who may have less experience with mobile devices is crucial.
METHODS 1,776 members (aged 77) of the MRC National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) were invited to complete 13 online cognitive tasks. Adherence was measured through task compliance, while uptake (consent, attempt, completion) was linked to health and sociodemographic factors. Usability was evaluated through qualitative feedback.
RESULTS This study’s consent (56.9%), attempt (80.5%), and completion (88.8%) rates are comparable to supervised NSHD sub-studies. Significant predictors of uptake included education, sex, handedness, cognitive scores, weight, smoking, alcohol consumption, and disease burden.
DISCUSSION With key recommendations followed, online cognitive assessments are feasible, with good adherence, and usability in older adults.
Competing Interest Statement
The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, report writing, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. AH is owner/director of H2 Cognitive Designs Ltd and Future Cognition Ltd, which produce online assessment technology and provide online survey data collection for third parties. PH is founder and director of H2 Cognitive Designs LTD, which develops and markets online cognitive tasks.
Funding Statement
MR, MP, AW are funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00019/1 and 3). VG is supported by the Medical Research Council, MR/W00710X/1. MDG is funded by Imperial College London. ZC is funded by Kings College London. Insight 46 is funded by grants from Alzheimer's Research UK (ARUK-PG2014-1946, ARUK- PG2017-1946), Alzheimer's Association (SG-666374-UK BIRTH COHORT), the Medical Research Council Dementias Platform UK (CSUB19166), The Wolfson Foundation (PR/ylr/18575), The Medical Research Council (MC_UU_10019/1, MC_UU_10019/3), and Brain Research Trust (UCC14191). JMS J.M.S. is supported by University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
National Research Ethics Service Committee London (REC reference 14/LO/1173) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data analysed in the present study are available via the NSHD data access process(https://nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data-sharing/)
