Hypoperfusion Profiles in outcome after Endovascular Therapy for Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occluded Patients =================================================================================================================== * Feina Shi * Yigang Chen * Xu Zheng * Yun Jiang * Ziqi Xu * En Wang * Changzhu Wu * Chuan Xu * Qingqing Gao * Xi Hu * Jinhua Zhang ## Abstract **Background** Patients with acute symptomatic isolated internal carotid artery occlusions (iICAO), also known as ICA-I occlusion, frequently presented with minor neurological deficits. However, they remained at risk for subsequent neurological deterioration even after intravenous thrombolysis. The efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in iICAO patients remains uncertain. Recently, some retrospective studies revealed EVT for acute iICAO was safe and might confer potential benefits. Our aim was to identify the hypoperfusion profiles associated with neurological deterioration and functional outcome following EVT in iICAO patients. **Methods** We performed a multi-center, real-world cohort study involving acute symptomatic iICAO patients who underwent EVT from August 2018 to February 2024 across 3 stroke centers. Hypoperfusion profiles were assessed using Tmax volumes (>4s, >6s, >8s, and >10s) and Tmax mismatch ratios (>10s/>8s, >10s/>6s, >10s>4s, >8s/>6s, >8s/>4s, and >6s/>4s). Neurological deterioration was defined as an increase of ⩾4 points in the NIHSS score prior to EVT. Good outcome was defined as modified Rankin Score 0 - 1 at 90 days. **Results** A total of 63 patients were included in the final analysis. Multivariable models showed that a lower Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s was an independent predictor for increased risk of neurological deterioration (OR, 0.003; 95% CI: 0.000-0.133; P = 0.003) and was associated with a better outcome following EVT (OR, 0.066; 95% CI: 0.005-0.874; P = 0.039) after adjustment. The optimal threshold for the Tmax >6s/>4s ratio was identified as 0.5. **Conclusions** A perfusion defect severity ratio of Tmax >6s/>4s less than 0.5 might indicate the likelihood of neurological deterioration, yet it would be associated with achieving a good outcome following EVT for iICAO patients. The hypoperfusion profile characterized by a Tmax >6s/>4s might be useful to the neurointerventionists for facilitating appropriate patient triage and guiding prognosis for EVT in iICAO patients. Keywords * acute ischemic stroke * symptomatic isolated internal carotid artery occlusion * Tmax mismatch ratio * neurological deterioration * outcome ## Introduction Isolated internal carotid artery occlusion (iICAO), without associated occlusions of the circle of Willis (ie, without T-shaped, L-shaped, or tandem occlusions), was not rare among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, accounting for approximately 10%-20% of all carotid occlusions1–3. Although many clinical trials have suggested the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) for AIS patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) 4,5, those patients with iICAO have often been overlooked. Given the lack of evidence derived from randomized trials, the potential benefits of EVT for the AIS patients only with iICAO remains unclear. Recently, several non-randomized studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of EVT for iICAO patients6,7. Clinical severity among patients with iICAO is highly variable and they frequently present with minor neurological deficits in part as a function of collateral circulation8. The iICAO patients often exhibit extensive hypoperfusion on imaging, indicating insufficient cerebral perfusion despite good arterial collateral circulation. The cerebral collateral cascade, facilitating the successful delivery of blood flow to ischemic tissue, would influence the clinical and radiological outcomes in AIS patients 9. For iICAO patients allowing blood flow to the middle cerebral artery through the circle of Willis, the arterial collateral circulation on CT angiography (CTA) seemed adequate. However, the extensive hypoperfusion observed in iICAO patients still indicates inadequacy of collateral supply. Thus, the extensive hypoperfusion observed in iICAO patients might be the result of the complex vascular mechanisms, rather than solely by arterial collaterals. It has been demonstrated that perfusion delay lesions would be related with neurological deterioration10. In previous studies, early neurological deterioration was reported in 15-30% of these iICAO patients even after intravenous thrombolysis or when presenting with mild symptoms initially 8,11. Therefore, it is crucial to identify iICAO patients who are at high risk for neurological deterioration, as they are the individuals most likely to benefit from these promising therapies, such as EVT. CT perfusion (CTP) is increasingly applied to quantitative evaluation of perfusion status of the whole brain in AIS patients. In clinical trials, CTP has been used to select optimal candidates who would benefit from reperfusion therapy. The characteristics of hypoperfused brain regions and their relationship with outcome after EVT for iICAO patients still remain unclear. In previous studies, hypoperfusion profiles evaluated with time-to-peak of the residual function (Tmax) ratios were found to be associated with infarct growth and functional outcome12–14. In this study, we aimed to explore hypoperfusion profiles of iICAO associated with neurological deterioration. We also evaluated the relationship between hypoperfusion profiles and functional outcome after EVT in iICAO patients. ## Material and Methods ### Ethics Statement The investigations have been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the local human ethics committees. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their designated proxy to confirm the acceptance of reperfusion therapy. ### Patients The current multi-center real-world retrospective cohort study reviewed acute ischemic stroke patients who were treated with EVT from August 2018 to February 2024 from 3 stroke centers. Then, patients were included if they (1) had a recent diagnosis (<2 weeks) of AIS confirmed with by DWI or CT; (2) underwent CTP before EVT treatment; and (3) had ipsilateral ICAO without occlusion of the ipsilateral intracranial large arteries, such as C7 segment of ICA, M1–M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery, A1-A2 segments of the anterior cerebral artery, P1-P2 segments of the posterior cerebral artery. Patients who had poor image quality due to motion artifacts or incomplete images were excluded. ### Clinical data Baseline clinical variables and radiologic data were recorded, including demographics, risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, a history of stroke/TIA and atrial fibrillation), prior usage of antiplatelet/ anticoagulants, intravenous thrombolysis, onset-to-puncture time (OPT), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. The stroke etiologies were determined as large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism (CE), dissection, other causes or undetermined7. Neurological deterioration was defined as an increase of ⩾ 4 points in the NIHSS score before EVT15. Patients were then dichotomized into good outcome (mRS score of ≤1) and poor outcome (mRS score of >1) at 90 days. ### Imaging Analysis The occlusion location was determined on reconstructed CTA images derived from CTP. Recanalization after EVT was assessed on DSA images as modified TICI grades ≥2b, and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) was assessed on follow-up NCCT according to the second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS Ⅱ)16. Pretreatment relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) of less than 30% at CTP was used to calculate the baseline infarct core volume, and T*max* was used for volumetric measurement of pretreatment hypoperfusion lesion profiles. The hypoperfused brain tissue volumes were automatically measured using Tmax thresholds of >10s, >8s, >6s, and >4s. Tmax ratios of >10s/>8s, >10s/>6s, >10s>4s, >8s/>6s, >8s/>4s, and >6s/>4s were considered Tmax mismatch ratios. All imaging analyses were assessed by the independent experienced neuroradiologist. ### Statistical Analysis Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile range, and categorical variables were reported as proportions. For categorical variables, Chi-Square test was used to compare differences among groups. For continuous variables, Man-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference between two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the discriminative ability and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Optimal cutoff values were derived from ROC curves, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated on the basis of these best cutoff values. The variables with P values <0.1 at univariable analysis were included in the multivariable models. Multivariable regression analysis was performed using the method of backward. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, Version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ## Results ### Patient Characteristics A total of 65 patients met the inclusion criteria and 2 patients were excluded due to poor image quality. Finally, a total of 63 patients with AIS attributable to iICAO were included in final analysis, with a median age of 66 (55-72) years, a median NIHSS score of 9 (6-14), and a median OPT of 993 (660-2001) min. A median of baseline infarct core (CBF <30%) volume was 0.9 (0.0-14.7) mL, and a median of Tmax>6s volume was 142.6 (52.8-234.0) mL. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered to 7 (11.1%) patients. Neurological deterioration occurred prior to EVT in 34 (54.0%) iICAO patients. Among these, 59 (93.7%) iICAO patients achieved successful recanalization, and hemorrhagic transformation was observed in 11(17.5%) iICAO patients after EVT. ### Association of hypoperfusion profiles with neurological deterioration in iICAO patients As show in Table 1, the iICAO patients with neurological deterioration had a significantly lower NIHSS score (median 7 vs 11, P<0.001) and a lower ASPECTS score (median 8 vs 9, P=0.023) than those without neurological deterioration. The iICAO patients with neurological deterioration had a significantly lower baseline infarct core volume (median 0.0mL vs 8.3mL, P=0.006). Compared to those without neurological deterioration, iICAO patients with neurological deterioration exhibited significantly lower volumes of Tmax>6s (median 105.7mL vs 197.4mL, P=0.034), Tmax>8s (median 32.1mL vs 111.0mL, P=0.021), Tmax>10s (median 6.4mL vs 40.7 mL, P=0.003). However, there was no significant association between Tmax>4s volume and neurological deterioration. Furthermore, Tmax mismatch ratios, including Tmax ratios of >10s/8s (median 0.3 vs 0.6, P<0.001), >10s/>6s (median 0.1 vs 0.3, P=0.001), >10s/>4s (median 0.0 vs 0.1, P=0.001), >8s/>6s (median 0.4 vs 0.6, P=0.004), >8s/>4s (median 0.1 vs 0.3, P=0.003), >6s/>4s (median 0.4 vs 0.6, P=0.001), were significantly lower in iICAO patients with neurological deterioration compared to those without neurological deterioration. View this table: [Table 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/19/2024.09.18.24313935/T1) Table 1 Comparison of Characteristics between Symptomatic Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Patients with Neurological Deterioration Then, the baseline NIHSS score, ASPECTS score, baseline infarct core volume, and alongside with each hypoperfusion profile with P < 0.1 from the univariable analyses (i.e., the volume of Tmax>6s, Tmax>8s, Tmax>10s, and Tmax ratios of >10s/8s, >10s/6s, >10s/>4s, >8s/6s, >8s/>4s, >6s/>4s), were included in a separate multivariable regression analysis. Multivariable models showed that Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s (OR, 0.003; 95% CI: 0.000-0.133; P = 0.003), Tmax ratio of >8s/>4s (OR, 0.010; 95% CI: 0.000-0.510; P = 0.022), and the volume of Tmax>6s (OR, 0.994; 95% CI: 0.987-1.000; P = 0.049) were all independently associated with neurological deterioration after adjustment, respectively. The other hypoperfusion profiles did not emerge as independent factors of neurological deterioration (all P>0.05). The ROC analyses indicated that the optimal cutoff, AUC, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index for Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s in predicting neurological deterioration were 0.5, 79.3%, 70.6% and 49.9%, respectively. For Tmax ratio of >8s/>4s, these values were 0.2, 65.5%, 76.5%, and 42.0%. And these values were 164.2mL, 65.5%, 73.5%, and 39.0% for Tmax>6s (Table 2). View this table: [Table 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/19/2024.09.18.24313935/T2) Table 2 Ability of Perfusion Lesion to Discriminate Neurological Deterioration in Patients with Symptomatic Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion before Endovascular Thrombectomy ### Association of hypoperfusion profiles with functional outcome in iICAO patients receiving EVT Among 57 iICAO patients with pre-stroke mRS <1, good outcome (i.e., 90-day mRS <=1) after EVT was achieved in 23(40.4%) patients. As illustrated in Table 3, the iICAO patients with good outcome had a significantly lower NIHSS score (median 8 vs 11, P=0.010). Tmax volumes at Tmax>6s (median 55.7mL vs 164.2mL, P=0.006), Tmax>8s (median 14.7mL vs 66.4mL, P=0.007), and Tmax>10s (median 3.3mL vs 19.9mL, P=0.009) were significantly lower in iICAO patients with good outcome than those with poor outcome. The volume of Tmax>4s was inclined to be lower in iICAO patients with good outcome compared to those with poor outcome (median 189.3mL vs 309.0mL, P=0.053). Tmax mismatch ratios of >10s/>4s (median 0.0 vs 0.1, P=0.034), >8s/>4s (median 0.1 vs 0.2, P=0.033), >6s/>4s (median 0.4vs 0.5, P=0.037) were also significantly lower in iICAO patients with good outcome than those with poor outcome. There were no significant differences between these two groups in baseline infarct core volume, nor in the other hypoperfusion profiles (Tmax ratios of >10s/8s, >10s/>6s, >8s/>6s). We found that neurological deterioration was not related with the functional outcome after EVT in iICAO patients. There were no significant differences in recanalization rates, hemorrhagic transformation following EVT, or stroke etiologies between patients with good outcome and poor outcome. View this table: [Table 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/19/2024.09.18.24313935/T3) Table 3 Comparison of Characteristics between Symptomatic Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment with Good Outcome and Poor outcome Then, the baseline NIHSS score, ASPECTS score, and each hypoperfusion profile with P < 0.1 from the univariable analysis (i.e., the volume of Tmax>4s, Tmax>6s, Tmax>8s, Tmax>10s, and Tmax ratios of >10s/6s, >10s/>4s, >8s/>4s, >6s/>4s) were incorporated into a separate multivariable regression model. Multivariable models indicated that the volumes of Tmax>4s (OR, 0.996; 95% CI: 0.992-1.000; P = 0.038), Tmax>6s (OR, 0.993; 95% CI: 0.988-0.999; P = 0.016), and Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s (OR, 0.066; 95% CI: 0.005-0.874; P = 0.039) were all independent predictors of good outcome after EVT in iICAO patients after adjustment,respectively. The ROC analyses identified the optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index for the Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s in predicting functional outcome after EVT as 0.5, 55.9%, 73.9% and 29.8%, respectively. For Tmax>4s, the values were 166.7mL, 91.2%, 47.8%, and 39.0%, while for Tmax>6s, they were 64.9mL, 82.4%, 60.9%, 43.3% (Table 4). View this table: [Table 4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/19/2024.09.18.24313935/T4) Table 4 Ability of Perfusion Lesion to Discriminate Neurological Outcome in Patients with Symptomatic Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion after Endovascular Thrombectomy T*max*: time-to-peak of the residual function; AUC: area under the curve. ## Discussion In this multicenter real-world study, we found that a lower Tmax ratio of >6s/>4s was an independent predictor for a higher risk of neurological deterioration before EVT, and it was independently associated with a better functional outcome after EVT for AIS patients with iICAO. A threshold of Tmax >6s/>4s of 0.5 enabled prediction of neurological deterioration and functional outcome. The optimal treatment strategies for iICAO patients still remain uncertain and depend on the expertise. Previous studies have provided limited data regarding EVT for acute symptomatic iICAO. According to the current AHA/ASA guideline based on large EVT clinical trials, EVT is a well-proven treatment for LVO including distal ICA and MCA5. A limited number of AIS patients with iICAO were included in those clinical trials. Some researches with small samples have indicated that EVT might be an alternative approach for symptomatic iICAO patients by mitigating the risk of neurological deterioration secondary to hemodynamic insufficiency and subsequent infarction7,17. A retrospective observational study from MR CLEAN analyzed a total of 51 iICAO patients and found that those who underwent EVT demonstrated better outcome compared to those receiving medical treatment alone6. Recently, a retrospective analysis of 45 iICAO patients from ETIS registry suggested that EVT for AIS (<2weeks) due to iICAO was associated with a high recanalization rate and a 40% rate of good functional outcome7. These results were comparable to those observed in AIS patients with intracranial occlusions following EVT. Nearly half of AIS patients undergoing EVT did not have good outcome despite successful recanalization, a phenomenon referred to as futile recanalization18. This suggested that successful recanalization might not necessarily correspond to effective reperfusion of ischemic brain tissues. The inadequate perfusion status of brain tissue would be related with futile recanalization due to the no-reflow phenomenon or reperfusion injury19,20. It is worth exploring the role of perfusion status before EVT in facilitating appropriate triage of iICAO patients for EVT. Brain tissue-level perfusion parameters on perfusion imaging reflected the comprehensive manifestation of the arterial collateral blood flow successfully permeated to the brain tissue and then transit to venous circulation. CTP could provide the quantitative information of cerebral perfusion, which might contribute to the selection of the optimal candidates for reperfusion therapy. The perfusion pattern in patients with iICAO characterized by a small core but a large hypoperfusion might be differ from perfusion profiles seen in AIS patients with intracranial occlusions. Good collateral circulation via the circle of Willis could maintain perfusion for the brain tissue in the affected hemisphere21. The neurological deficits would be exacerbated when hypoperfusion prolonged as a result of inadequate treatment and collateral circulation failure22. The iICAO patients with neurological symptoms implying hypoperfusion might due to collapsed collateral circulation. Therefore, tissue-level perfusion status measured with CTP might be helpful in refining the selection of EVT-eligible iICAO patients. Tmax mismatch ratios offer a comprehensive evaluation of perfusion delay status of brain tissue, which might be useful for selection of iICAO patients eligible for endovascular intervention. For AIS patients with intracranial LVO, previous studies showed that the ratio of Tmax>10s />6s was associated with fast infarct progression and functional outcome12,14. And a lower Tmax ratio of >10 s/>6 s was found to be associated with intracranial atherosclerotic LVO characterized as chronic hypoperfusion14,23. A previous study has demonstrated that a profile of Tmax >4 s/ >6s with ≥2 was an independent indicator of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease24. The threshold of Tmax >4 s has been defined as brain tissues likely exhibiting benign oligemic, whereas Tmax >6 s signifies brain tissues at risk, commonly referred to as penumbral lesions. Tmax >10 s is indicative of brain tissues experiencing malignant hypoperfusion14,23,24. For patients with iICAO, the perfusion status might be different from that observed in AIS patients with intracranial LVO. In our study, we observed that a perfusion profile characterized by a lower Tmax >6s/>4s was independently associated with a higher rate of neurological deterioration and better functional outcome after EVT in iICAO patients, suggesting that a cutoff value of 0.5 might be optimal for EVT. Consequently, our findings might reflect the presence of clinically silent oligemic brain tissues and penumbra lesions that are at high risk for progression. However, these hypoperfused brain tissues could still be salvaged through EVT intervention, resulting in functional recovery. There are several limitations of this study. Firstly, as this study was based on retrospective analyses, our findings might have selection bias and require prospective validation. Secondly, this multicenter study consisting of a selected population in which eligibility for EVT was decided by the local stroke teams, and lacked data from patients who did not receiving EVT were lacking. Lastly, the sample size of this study was relatively small. Future investigations into the outcomes following EVT in iICAO patients should be conducted through larger sample sizes and randomized prospective clinical trials. ## Conclusion In summary, our findings have suggested perfusion defect severity ratio of Tmax >6s/>4s less than 0.5 might indicate an elevated risk of neurological deterioration, yet it would be associated with achieving better outcome after EVT for iICAO patients. Therefore, the hypoperfusion profile characterized by a Tmax >6s/>4s on CTP could be valuable for the neurointerventionists in facilitating appropriate patient triage and guiding prognosis for EVT in iICAO patients. ## Disclosure None declared. ## Data availability statement The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. ## Sources of Funding This work was support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82402210), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ23H090014) and Medical Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province (2023KY778). ## Abbreviations iICAO : isolated internal carotid artery occlusion AIS : acute ischemic stroke NIHSS : National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale OPT : onset-to-puncture time HT : hemorrhagic transformation EVT : endovascular treatment LVO : large vessel occlusion CTA : CT angiography CTP : CT perfusion ROC : receiver operating characteristic AUC : area under the curve mRS : modified Rankin Scale score LAA : large-artery atherosclerosis CE : cardioembolism TICI : Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction CBF : cerebral blood flow T*max* : time-to-peak of the residual function * Received September 18, 2024. * Revision received September 18, 2024. * Accepted September 19, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## Reference 1. 1.Liebeskind DS, Flint AC, Budzik RF, Xiang B, Smith WS, Duckwiler GR, Nogueira RG. Carotid I’s, L’s and T’s: collaterals shape the outcome of intracranial carotid occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:402–407. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011231 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6Im5ldXJpbnRzdXJnIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjcvNi80MDIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOS8xOS8yMDI0LjA5LjE4LjI0MzEzOTM1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 2. 2.Damania D, Kung NT, Jain M, Jain AR, Liew JA, Mangla R, Koch GE, Sahin B, Miranpuri AS, Holmquist TM, et al. Factors associated with recurrent stroke and recanalization in patients presenting with isolated symptomatic carotid occlusion. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:127–132. doi: 10.1111/ene.12819 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ene.12819&link_type=DOI) 3. 3.Duloquin G, Graber M, Garnier L, Crespy V, Comby PO, Baptiste L, Mohr S, Delpont B, Guéniat J, Blanc-Labarre C, et al. Incidence of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Visible Arterial Occlusion: A Population-Based Study (Dijon Stroke Registry). Stroke. 2020;51:2122–2130. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029949 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029949&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) 4. 4.Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00163-x [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00163-x&link_type=DOI) 5. 5.Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50:e344–e418. doi: 10.1161/str.0000000000000211 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/STR.0000000000000211&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31662037&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) 6. 6.Hoving JW, Kappelhof M, Schembri M, Emmer BJ, Berkhemer OA, Groot AED, Dippel DWJ, van Zwam WH, Coutinho JM, Marquering HA, et al. Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with isolated distal internal carotid artery occlusion: a retrospective observational study. Neuroradiology. 2021;63:777–786. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02550-5 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00234-020-02550-5&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Ter Schiphorst A, Peres R, Dargazanli C, Blanc R, Gory B, Richard S, Marnat G, Sibon I, Guillon B, Bourcier R, et al. Endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke due to isolated internal carotid artery occlusion: ETIS registry data analysis. J Neurol. 2022;269:4383–4395. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11078-y [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00415-022-11078-y&link_type=DOI) 8. 8.Ter Schiphorst A, Gaillard N, Dargazanli C, Mourand I, Corti L, Charif M, Ayrignac X, Lippi A, Bouly S, Thibault L, et al. Symptomatic isolated internal carotid artery occlusion with initial medical management: a monocentric cohort. J Neurol. 2021;268:346–355. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10118-9 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00415-020-10118-9&link_type=DOI) 9. 9.Faizy TD, Mlynash M, Kabiri R, Christensen S, Kuraitis GM, Mader MM, Flottmann F, Broocks G, Lansberg MG, Albers GW, et al. The Cerebral Collateral Cascade: Comprehensive Blood Flow in Ischemic Stroke. Neurology. 2022. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200340 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/wnl.0000000000200340&link_type=DOI) 10. 10.Gwak DS, Kwon JA, Shim DH, Kim YW, Hwang YH. Perfusion and Diffusion Variables Predict Early Neurological Deterioration in Minor Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion. J Stroke. 2021;23:61–68. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.01466 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5853/jos.2020.01466&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) 11. 11.Boulenoir N, Turc G, Henon H, Laksiri N, Mounier-Véhier F, Girard Buttaz I, Duong DL, Papassin J, Yger M, Triquenot A, et al. Early neurological deterioration following thrombolysis for minor stroke with isolated internal carotid artery occlusion. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:479–490. doi: 10.1111/ene.14541 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ene.14541&link_type=DOI) 12. 12.Seners P, Yuen N, Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Heit JJ, Christensen S, Escribano-Paredes JB, Carrera E, Strambo D, Michel P, et al. Factors Associated With Fast Early Infarct Growth in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With a Large Vessel Occlusion. Neurology. 2023;101:e2126–e2137. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207908 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/wnl.0000000000207908&link_type=DOI) 13. 13.Liu XL, Hang Y, Cao Y, Jia Z, Zhao LB, Shi HB, Liu S. Tmax profile in computed tomography perfusion-based RAPID software maps influences outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023;15:639–643. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018557 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6Im5ldXJpbnRzdXJnIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjE1LzcvNjM5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDkvMTkvMjAyNC4wOS4xOC4yNDMxMzkzNS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 14. 14.Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Inoue M, Marks MP, Wheeler HM, Kemp S, Straka M, Zaharchuk G, Bammer R, Lansberg MG, et al. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 Cohort. Stroke. 2014;45:1018–1023. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.003857 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjQ1LzQvMTAxOCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA5LzE5LzIwMjQuMDkuMTguMjQzMTM5MzUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 15. 15.Seners P, Turc G, Oppenheim C, Baron JC. Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:87–94. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308327 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiam5ucCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo3OiI4Ni8xLzg3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDkvMTkvMjAyNC4wOS4xOC4yNDMxMzkzNS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 16. 16.Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08020-9 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9788453&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000076573800007&link_type=ISI) 17. 17.de Castro-Afonso LH, Nakiri GS, Moretti Monsignore L, Dias FA, Aléssio-Alves FF, Rezende MT, Trivelato FP, Pontes-Neto OM, Abud DG. Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Isolated Cervical Carotid Occlusions: The Concept of "Hemodynamic Thrombectomy". Interv Neurol. 2020;8:27–37. doi: 10.1159/000493021 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000493021&link_type=DOI) 18. 18.Heit JJ, Mlynash M, Christensen S, Kemp SM, Lansberg MG, Marks MP, Olivot JM, Gregory AW. What predicts poor outcome after successful thrombectomy in late time windows? J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13:421–425. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016125 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6Im5ldXJpbnRzdXJnIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjEzLzUvNDIxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDkvMTkvMjAyNC4wOS4xOC4yNDMxMzkzNS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 19. 19.Ter Schiphorst A, Charron S, Hassen WB, Provost C, Naggara O, Benzakoun J, Seners P, Turc G, Baron JC, Oppenheim C. Tissue no-reflow despite full recanalization following thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke with proximal occlusion: A clinical study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41:253–266. doi: 10.1177/0271678x20954929 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0271678X20954929&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32960688&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) 20. 20.Bai J, Lyden PD. Revisiting cerebral postischemic reperfusion injury: new insights in understanding reperfusion failure, hemorrhage, and edema. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:143–152. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12434 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ijs.12434&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25598025&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) 21. 21.van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Slob MJ, Rinkel GJ. Predictive value of angiographic testing for tolerance to therapeutic occlusion of the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:175–178. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15661722&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000226729300036&link_type=ISI) 22. 22.Cechetti F, Pagnussat AS, Worm PV, Elsner VR, Ben J, da Costa MS, Mestriner R, Weis SN, Netto CA. Chronic brain hypoperfusion causes early glial activation and neuronal death, and subsequent long-term memory impairment. Brain Res Bull. 2012;87:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.10.006 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.10.006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22040859&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F19%2F2024.09.18.24313935.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000300198600015&link_type=ISI) 23. 23.Yoshimoto T, Inoue M, Tanaka K, Koge J, Shiozawa M, Kamogawa N, Ishiyama H, Abe S, Imamura H, Kataoka H, et al. Tmax Mismatch Ratio to Identify Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis-Related Large-Vessel Occlusion Before Endovascular Therapy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e029899. doi: 10.1161/jaha.123.029899 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/jaha.123.029899&link_type=DOI) 24. 24.Haussen DC, Bouslama M, Dehkharghani S, Grossberg JA, Bianchi N, Bowen M, Frankel MR, Nogueira RG. Automated CT Perfusion Prediction of Large Vessel Acute Stroke from Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease. Interv Neurol. 2018;7:334–340. doi: 10.1159/000487335 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000487335&link_type=DOI)