Abstract
Rapid urbanization in India is contributing to heightened poor air quality. Yet research on the impact of poor air on adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) especially in the public health aspect is less in India. This study investigates the influence of air quality on birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB). Utilizing data from the National Family Health Survey and satellite images, the study employs various statistical analyses and spatial models to elucidate the connection between in-utero exposure to air pollution and birth outcomes, both at the individual and district levels. It was observed that approximately 13% of children were born prematurely, and 17% were born with low birth weight. Increased ambient PM2.5 concentrations during pregnancy were associated with higher odds of LBW (AOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.29–1.45). Mothers exposed to PM2.5 during pregnancy had a heightened likelihood of delivering prematurely (AOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.57–1.77) in comparison to unexposed mothers. Climatic factors such as rainfall and temperature had a greater association with ABOs. Children residing in the Northern districts of India appeared to be more susceptible to the adverse effects of ambient air pollution. Furthermore, indoor air pollution was found to be associated with LBW. Employing a distributed spline approach, the study identified a discernible upward trend in the risk of adverse birth outcomes as the level of exposure increased, particularly following an exposure level of 40 PM2.5 ug/m3. Among the spatial models employed, the MGWR spatial model exhibited the highest level of goodness of fit. In addition to addressing immediate determinants such as nutrition and maternal healthcare, it is imperative to collaboratively address distal factors encompassing both indoor and outdoor pollution to attain lasting enhancements in child health.
Highlights
An estimated 13% of the children were preterm and 17% were low birth weight in India in 2019-21.
High PM2.5 concentration during pregnancy was associated with LBW and PTB.
Children residing in the Northern districts of India were found to be more vulnerable to poor air quality.
A rising trend in the risk of adverse birth outcomes was observed after exposure level of 40 PM2.5 ug/m3.
The MGWR spatial model demonstrated the highest level of goodness of fit.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No financial assistance has been granted from any survey organization, institutional open access or any other alternative sources to carry out the research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Indian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) is known as National Family Health Survey (NFHS) in India. We used published large scale national data where every respondent was anonymized in the data set itself. As it is not based on a primary survey-cases, we need not to do any anonymization in the study as the data is already made in that fashion following all ethical protocols. Thereby, it is certified that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of the survey.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
