ABSTRACT
Objectives Technology-related prescribing errors curtail the positive impacts of computerised provider order entry (CPOE) on medication safety. Understanding how technology-related errors occur can inform CPOE optimisation. Previously, we developed a classification of the underlying mechanisms of technology-related errors using prescribing error data from two adult hospitals. Our objective was to update the classification using paediatric prescribing error data, and to assess the reliability with which reviewers could independently apply the classification.
Materials and Methods Using data on 1696 prescribing errors identified by chart review in 2016 and 2017 at a tertiary paediatric hospital, we identified errors that were technology-related. These errors were investigated to classify their underlying mechanisms using our previously developed classification, and new categories were added based on the data. A two-step process was used to identify and classify technology-related errors involving review of the error in the CPOE and simulating the error in the CPOE testing environment.
Results The Technology-Related Error Mechanism (TREM) classification comprises seven categories and 19 subcategories. The seven categories are: 1) errors due to incorrect system configuration or system malfunction, 2) prescribing on the wrong patient record, 3) selection errors, 4) construction errors, 5) editing errors, 6) errors that occur when using workflows that differ from a paper-based system 7) contributing factor: use of hybrid systems.
Conclusion Technology-related errors remain a critical issue for CPOE. The updated TREM classification provides a systematic means of assessing and monitoring technology-related errors to inform and prioritise system improvements, and has now been updated for the paediatric setting.
What is already known on this topic
Technology-related errors occur frequently in computerised provider order entry (CPOE).
Technology-related errors can be addressed by CPOE modifications; however, an understanding of how the errors occurred is required.
What this study adds
This study presents a method for classifying how technology-related errors occur, the Technology-Related Error Mechanism (TREM) classification.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
Using the TREM classification can aid system managers in identifying areas for CPOE optimisation to deliver improved patient safety outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership grant with the Sydney Childrens Hospital Network (1094878). MZR was supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (APP1143941). JIW was supported by a NHMRC Elizabeth Blackburn Leadership Investigator Grant (APP1174021).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Sydney Children's Hospital Network Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/15/SCHN/370).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
