Abstract
Stemming from a complex picture of compositional, contextual and wider determinants, health inequalities are presented at the level in which people reside (i.e., their place). Examples of this exist within Essex, England, where despite seeming affluence, pockets of high multiple deprivation exist. Programmes delivered across the system representing each place may provide a solution to these complex challenges. For this reason, Epping Forest District Council commissioned the evaluation of a programme representing two place-based projects within their district (i.e., Limes Farm and Oakwood Hill). This paper provides the evaluation protocol for this programme. Broadly, the evaluation seeks to investigate the design, implementation, mechanisms and effectiveness of both projects. Our evaluation is underpinned by the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines for the design, evaluation and implementation for complex interventions, and takes inspiration from a realist approach. We aim to understand where each project works, who does the projects work for, what impact do the projects have, and how and why does the projects work. This will be achieved through a mixed-methods approach which utilises a cohort study, ripple-effects mapping, focus groups, and secondary data analysis. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive, general linear and multi- level models, while qualitative data will be understood using visualisation (ripple-effects maps) and reflexive thematic analysis. Data will be triangulated to create programme theory configurations, which explain the outcomes which stemming from the programme, and how these are shaped by mechanisms within a given context. We anticipate our novel and robust approach to contribute to policy surrounding the adoption and implementation of place-based approaches.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The present study has been approved by the University of Essex Ethics Sub Committee 2: ETH2324-1384. Written consent will be obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.
