Abstract
Background Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of death in elderly people. Previous studies on exploring the association between intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma and the IS risk provided inconsistent results and unclear elucidations.
Methods Here, multiple genetic approaches were employed to investigate the possible causality between these traits. First, we performed the traditional bidirectional mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between IOP, glaucoma and IS. Second, the SNPs selected as instrumental variables for IOP and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were mapped to relevant genes by the novel combined SNP-to-gene (cS2G) method. The genes with significant causal effects on IS were then introduced to the gene ontology (GO), pathway and colocalization analyses. Third, the partitioned heritability analysis was also performed to evaluate the genome complexity with the Linkage Disequilibrium Score (LDSC) tool. Fourth, we also performed single SNP mendelian randomization (SSMR) study to find the SNPs of IOP and glaucoma, which had significant causal influence on IS risk. Then, they were introduced to the cytogenetic investigation. The multiple variable MR (MVMR) was applied to assess the independence of the causal effect of the exposures.
Results The MR results supported the view that the elevated IOP and POAG may contribute to the IS risk, but not vice versa. By using the cS2G approach, we identified 31 and 3 genes which may play key roles in the IOP- and POAG-induced IS risk, respectively. The GO and pathway analyses indicated the olfactory pathway to be a crucial pathway in the IOP-associated mechanism. The colocalization study strengthened the causal implications of genes CDKNA2A and CDKN2B-AS1 between POAG and IS. The partitioned heritability analysis showed that the most enriched categories for both IOP and POAG were regulatory-associated terms such as the Super-enhancer. The SSMR study demonstrated that the IOP-associated SNPs with causal effects on IS were located majorly in chromosomes 1 and 11, while the POAG-associated ones were mostly found in chromosomes 9 and 4. The MVMR confirmed that the causal effects of IOP and POAG were not independent from each other.
Conclusions This work provides novel evidences to support the causal implications between IOP, POAG and IS, and offered putative pathway and genes for managing IOP and POAG in IS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The GWAS summary statistics data of these datasets were obtained from the IEU OpenGWAS project (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). Their basic features (GWAS ID, sample size, ethnics and links) were summarized in Table S1.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The links of the GWAS data were described appropriately in the paper. The codes and detailed information required to replicate the results in this work are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
