Abstract
Combining information from multiple GWASs for a disease and its risk factors has proven a powerful approach for development of polygenic risk scores (PRSs). This may be particularly useful for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a highly polygenic and heterogeneous disease where the additional predictive value of a PRS is unclear. Here, we use a meta-scoring approach to develop a metaPRS for T2D that incorporated genome-wide associations from both European and non-European genetic ancestries and T2D risk factors. We evaluated the performance of this metaPRS and benchmarked it against existing genome-wide PRS in 620,059 participants and 50,572 T2D cases amongst six diverse genetic ancestries from UK Biobank, INTERVAL, the All of Us Research Program, and the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort. We show that our metaPRS was the most powerful PRS for predicting T2D in European population-based cohorts and had comparable performance to the top ancestry-specific PRS, highlighting its transferability. In UK Biobank, we show the metaPRS had stronger predictive power for 10-year risk than all individual risk factors apart from BMI and biomarkers of dysglycemia. The metaPRS modestly improved T2D risk stratification of QDiabetes risk scores for 10-year risk prediction, particularly when prioritising individuals for blood tests of dysglycemia. Overall, we present a highly predictive and transferrable PRS for T2D and demonstrate that the potential for PRS to incrementally improve T2D risk prediction when incorporated into UK guideline-recommended screening and risk prediction with a clinical risk score.
Competing Interest Statement
During the course of this project G.A. became a full-time employee of CSL Ltd. All significant contributions to this study were made prior to this role and CSL Ltd had no input to the study. A.M. and M.I.M are both employees of Genentech Ltd, and holders of Roche stock. Genentech Ltd. had no input to the study. J.D. serves on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, and UK Biobank, and has received multiple grants from academic, charitable and industry sources outside of the submitted work. A.S.B. reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, Bioverativ, Novartis, Regeneron and Sanofi. M.I. is a trustee of the Public Health Genomics (PHG) Foundation, a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Open Targets, and has research collaborations with AstraZeneca, Nightingale Health and Pfizer which are unrelated to this study. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by core funding from the British Heart Foundation (RG/18/13/33946: RG/F/23/110103), NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312) [*], BHF Chair Award (CH/12/2/29428) and by Health Data Research UK, which is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. *The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. L.P. was supported by a Rutherford Fund Fellowship from the Medical Research Council grant MR/S003746/1. X.J. was funded by British Heart Foundation (CH/12/2/29428) and Wellcome Trust (227566/Z/23/Z). Y.X. and M.I. are supported by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T013192/1). L. K. is funded by the NIHR BTRU in Donor Health and Behaviour (NIHR203337) and a BHF Chair award (CH/12/2/29428). S.A.L. was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research postdoctoral fellowship (MFE-171279). F.S.C. acknowledges support from United States' National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant ZIA-HG000024. J.C.D. acknowledges support from United States' National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant ZIA-HG200417. J.D. holds a BHF Professorship and a NIHR Senior Investigator Award. E.D.A. holds a NIHR Senior Investigator Award. M.I. is supported by the Munz Chair of Cardiovascular Prediction and Prevention and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UK Biobank: Ethics were approved by the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) in the UK, and this study was undertaken under UK Biobank project #7439. Participants gave informed and broad consent for health-related research. The INTERVAL cohort: Ethics were approved for this study by the National Research Ethics Service (11/EE/0538). All of Us Research Program: Research was conducted on the All of Us Researcher Workbench under the guidelines defined by the All of Us Ethical Conduct of Research Policy. Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort: Written consent was obtained from all participants, and this study was approved by the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board (reference codes: B-16-158 and N-18-059).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Corrected typo in one of the corresponding author's email address in the manuscript and supplementary information files.
Data Availability
Data from UK Biobank are available for health-related research subject to approval from the UK Biobank access committee. See https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access for further details. Data from the INTERVAL cohort can be requested by researchers for health-related research subject to approval from the INTERVAL Data Access Committee. Data will be shared through an institutional data sharing agreement. The INTERVAL Data Access Committee can be contacted via email at helpdesk@intervalstudy.org.uk. Further information on the data access policy can be found at http://www.donorhealth-btru.nihr.ac.uk/project/bioresource. Data from All of Us are available to researchers via the All of Us research hub subject to institutional data sharing agreement. For more information, see https://allofus.nih.gov/get-involved/opportunities-researchers. Data from the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort study can be requested by researchers for scientific purposes through an application process at the listed website (https://blog.nus.edu.sg/sphs/data-and-samples-request/). Data will be shared through an institutional data sharing agreement.
https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access
https://allofus.nih.gov/get-involved/opportunities-researchers
