Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Insulin Resistance Risk in Normal BMI Indians =================================================================================== * Sabitha Thummala * Junaid Ahmed Khan Ghori * Katherine Saikia * Sarah Fathima * Nithya Kruthi * AR Balamurali * Rahul Ranganathan ## ABSTRACT **Background** Insulin resistance (IR) contributes significantly to the onset of metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Identifying genetic markers associated with IR can offer insights into its mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. **Objective** This study investigated the association between four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insulin resistance among 191 individuals in the Indian population. **Methods** A literature review identified four SNPs linked to IR. Participants were divided into groups based on insulin resistance and sensitivity, determined by the Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR). DNA was extracted for genotyping using Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA) V3. Case-control analysis assessed SNP-genotype associations with insulin resistance and other clinical parameters. **Results** Among 191 participants, 57 were insulin-resistant and 134 were insulin-sensitive. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were found between selected SNPs and IR. SNP rs920590 showed the strongest association, with the T allele associated with increased IR risk (odds ratio = 4.01, 95% CI 1.55-10.34; p < 0.0014). Additionally, serum LDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, HbA1c, Insulin fasting and fat mass show significant differences in cases and controls. **Conclusion** This study validates genetic markers linked to insulin resistance (IR) in the Indian population and elucidates their roles in IR pathogenesis. Understanding these markers can inform personalised therapeutic strategies for metabolic disorders. KEYWORDSs * Insulin resistance * genetic markers * single nucleotide polymorphisms * case-control study * Indian population ## INTRODUCTION Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has a rich historical record dating back approximately 3000 years to Egyptian manuscripts1, making it one of humanity’s oldest known diseases. It encompasses a spectrum of metabolic disorders involving lipid, protein, and carbohydrate metabolism and is characterised by persistent hyperglycemia2. In 2019, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) accounted for 74% of global deaths, with diabetes alone contributing to 1.6 million fatalities3, 4. This global burden is particularly seen in developing countries like India, where an estimated 77 million individuals were affected by diabetes in 20194. Notably, individuals with Diabetes Mellitus face a significantly heightened risk of developing Metabolic Syndrome (Met S)5. Traditionally, Body mass index (BMI) has been considered a key marker of metabolic syndrome. However, recent research suggests the involvement of additional factors6, 7. Higher BMI does not consistently correlate with a higher frequency of metabolic syndrome among Asian patients8, prompting a reevaluation of conventional metrics. Focusing on body composition, particularly muscle and fat mass, provides a more nuanced understanding of metabolic health9. Previous epidemiological research has explored the relationship between fat mass and insulin resistance10. Anthropometric measures such as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio have emerged as better predictors of obesity-associated type 2 diabetes risk than BMI alone11, 12. However, the influence of body fat percentage (BF%) on insulin resistance remains underexplored, especially among individuals with normal BMI13, 14. Recent genetic research has identified correlations between specific genetic loci and metabolic traits, shedding light on the genetic underpinnings of metabolic health disparities15. Building upon this foundation, our study aims to delve into the potential genetic influences on insulin resistance within the Indian population, particularly among individuals with normal BMI. Through a comprehensive literature survey, we have identified a set of genes and SNPs linked with insulin resistance (IR). We seek to validate these findings within our population and ascertain their relevance in the Indian context. Given the emerging evidence suggesting genetic correlations with metabolic traits, our study seeks to explore the potential impact of genetic polymorphisms in four specific genes (*INTS10, LINC01427–LINC00261, SENP2*, and *SLC22A11*) on insulin resistance among individuals with normal BMI in the Indian population16. By investigating the association between these genetic variants and insulin resistance risk, we aim to enhance our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of metabolic health indicators. Recent genetic research has shown correlations between particular loci and percentage of body fat, suggesting protective effects against glycaemic and lipid outcomes17. Lowered total adiposity is typically associated with increased genetic susceptibility to insulin resistance, indicating that poor fat storage may be detrimental to metabolism. We will concurrently examine four SNPs within these genes: rs920590 in *INTS10*, rs7274134 in *LINC01427 - LINC00261*, rs6762208 in *SENP2*, and rs2078267 in *SLC22A11*. ## MATERIALS AND METHODS ### 1. Study Participants The research enrolled 191 participants (90 men and 101 women) of Indian ethnicity residing in India, aged 18-65 years, between January 2022 and December 2023. HOMA2-IR was used to categorise participants into cases and controls. Individuals with HOMA2-IR > 2 were classified as cases (57 participants), and those with HOMA2-IR < 2 (134 participants) were categorised as controls. The HOMA2-IR was calculated using the online tool provided by the Medical Science Division of The University of Oxford18. An electronic registration form was used to gather the demographic data of the participants, including their self-reported weight (kg) and height (cm). The formula for calculating body mass index (BMI) was weight (kg)/height (m^2)19. For adult males, the formula for Body Fat Percentage (BFP) was 1.20 x BMI + 0.23 x Age - 16.2, for an adult female, the formulas for Body Fat Percentage (BFP) were 1.20 x BMI + 0.23 x Age - 5.42020 and Fat Mass was BFP x Weight x 0.012020. To ensure participant safety and ethical consideration, the study included only individuals free from: cancer history, cardiovascular or renal failure, mental illnesses, and pregnancy or lactation. Every participant gave written, informed consent in accordance with the guidelines in the 2008 updated Declaration of Helsinki21. The study protocol received approval from the Answer Genomics Ethical Review Committee. Figure 1 provides a detailed graphical representation of the study’s structure and key components, outlining the research methodology, participant selection, and analysis framework. ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/F1) Figure 1: Study Flowchart ### 2. Laboratory Measurements Following a 12-hour fast, participants’ blood was drawn for analysis of important metabolic markers, including, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),. The assessments were conducted using Beckman DxC 700 AU for all markers except HbA1c, which was analyzed with Tosoh G-8, and fasting insulin levels measured by Beckman UniCel DxI 800, adhering to the protocols provided by the manufacturers. The healthy reference ranges for these markers were established as follows: FPG (70-100 mg/dl), TC (0-100 mg/dl), TG (0-150 mg/dl), HDL-C (40-60 mg/dl), and LDL-C (0-100 mg/dl). To determine insulin sensitivity, the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) was applied, calculated from fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/l) and fasting insulin (in mU/l) using the formula: fasting glucose times fasting insulin/22.510. Participants with a HOMA2-IR score above 2 were categorized as insulin resistant, while those with scores below 2 were considered insulin sensitive. The clinical characteristics of the study subjects and the distribution of these groupings are detailed in Table 2. View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T1) Table 1: Overview of the four single-nucleotide polymorphisms View this table: [Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T2) Table 2: Clinical Profiles and Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Parameters of Participants in the Current Study ### 3. Genotyping and Single-nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) selection This study investigated potential genetic influences on insulin resistance by analyzing participants’ DNA. The extraction of DNA was conducted on blood specimens utilizing the Qiagen blood extraction kit, acclaimed for its capability to isolate genomic DNA of superior quality from blood samples. The process of genotyping SNPs was executed with the aid of the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA) V3 platform, recognized for its extensive representation of genetic variance throughout the genome22. The Illumina iScan system was used for genotyping, while Genome Studio V2 software was used for interpreting the raw intensity data, quality control, and data export23. The study focused on four genes (*INTS10, LINC01427 - LINC00261, SENP2* and *SLC22A11*) involved in metabolism and potentially influencing insulin resistance, as indicated in Table 1. The selection of SNPs was based on a comprehensive literature review of scientific literature identifying genetic markers associated with metabolic traits. ### 4. Statistical analysis The evaluation of statistical differences commenced by examining the variations in age, glucose, and lipid metrics such as LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c between two groups. Given the data’s non-parametric characteristics, the Mann-Whitney U test (utilising the Scipy library) was utilised for these analyses17. Gender distribution across the groups was evaluated using the Chi-square test, with detailed results presented in Table 2. Utilising PLINK software24 for quality control, the study filtered genotype data by removing samples with low genotyping rates, excluding SNPs with significant missing data, and eliminating rare variants for their minimal statistical power. Heterozygosity checks were also conducted to ensure accurate genotype distribution. Subsequently, a study was carried out using SNPstats software25 to ascertain the correlation between the described four SNPs and insulin resistance. The analysis yielded odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Table 3 summarises the results, which show significant SNP markers under different genetic inheritance models. View this table: [Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T3) Table 3: Comparison of allelic and genotypic distribution of four SNPs (rs920590, rs7274134, rs6762208 and rs2078267) between the two groups HOMA2 IR >2 and HOMA2 IR <2 In the control group, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was maintained with a significance level set at 0.05. The assessment of risk was conducted through the calculation of odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The study also evaluated the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the SNPs, with the LD coefficient D being determined via the use of Snpstats software 25. Additionally, power analyses were conducted based on power and sample size calculations26. Each SNP underwent a Bonferroni adjustment was carried out for each SNP to rule out the possibility of a type I error brought on by multiple tests. ## RESULTS ### Subject characteristics In this study, all 191 participants were genotyped, with their clinical features and lipid metabolism indicators detailed in Table 2. The investigation revealed no meaningful statistical disparities in age or gender between the case and control groups, nor among males and females within those groups (p>0.05). Yet, notable distinctions were observed in BMI (0.01), Fat Mass (0.007), HBA1C (0.01), Glucose Fasting (0.001), and Serum Triglycerides (0.02), with the exceptions of BFP, Total Cholesterol, and Serum HDL Cholesterol when comparing cases to controls. ### Association of the 4 SNPs with IR In this study, the relationship between IR and four SNPs in the Indian population’s normal weight individuals was examined. To ensure the study had sufficient statistical power, a sample size calculation was performed. This calculation aimed to detect significant associations, considering a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. The frequency of genotypes for all four SNPs among both cases and controls was evaluated to examine their compliance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) through a Fisher exact test. None of the SNPs demonstrated a significant deviation from HWE (p > 0.05).suggesting the absence of genotyping errors and population stratification, the results are mentioned in Table 3. We performed chi-square tests to evaluate the association between genotypes and allele frequencies of each SNP with phenotype (IR). After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (p < 0.0125), all four SNPs displayed significant associations with IR: Chi-squared analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between the genotypic and allelic variations of four SNPs (rs920590, rs7274134, rs6762208, and rs2078267) within two groups distinguished by their HOMA2 IR levels (>2 and <2).The obtained p-values indicate significant associations between SNP genotypes and insulin resistance status.The allelic frequency difference between the cases and control were also found to be significant (p< 0.05) * For rs920590 (*INTS10*), individuals carrying the T/T genotype had an elevated risk of IR compared to those with C/C-C/T genotypes [Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.01; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.55-10.34; p < 0.0014] under the recessive model. * rs7274134 (*LINC01427 - LINC00261*), individuals carrying the C/T-T/T genotypes had an elevated risk of IR [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.37-4.96, p < 0.0032] according to the dominant model. * rs6762208 (*SENP2*), individuals carrying the A/C-C/C genotypes were associated with an increased risk of IR [Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.55-6.24, p < 0.0013] under the dominant model. * rs2078267 (*SLC22A11*), individuals carrying the T/T genotype showed a higher risk of IR [Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.22-11.28, p < 0.0091] under the recessive model. ## MODEL OF INHERITANCE ANALYSIS In order to comprehend the connection between genotype and insulin resistance (IR) risk in the Indian population, genetic inheritance patterns for the chosen SNPs were analyzed. Tables 4 through 7 outline the various inheritance models examined, including codominant, dominant, recessive, overdominant, and log-additive models, for SNPs rs920590 (*INTS10*), rs7274134 (*LINC01427 - LINC00261*), rs6762208 (*SENP2*), and rs2078267 (*SLC22A11*). View this table: [Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T4) Table 4. Inheritance models analysis of the SNP rs920590 (INTS10) between the Cases and Controls rs920590 association with response status (n=191, adjusted by gender+age.cat View this table: [Table 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T5) Table 5. Inheritance models analysis of the SNP rs7274134 (*LINC01427 - LINC00261*) between the Cases and Controls rs7274134 association with response status (n=191, adjusted by gender+age.cat) View this table: [Table 6.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T6) Table 6. Inheritance models analysis of the SNP rs6762208 (*SENP2*) between the Cases and Controls rs6762208 association with response status (n=191, adjusted by gender+age.cat) View this table: [Table 7.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24311638/T7) Table 7. Inheritance models analysis of the SNP rs2078267 (*SLC22A11*) between the Cases and Controls rs2078267 association with response status (n=191, adjusted by gender+age.cat) The determination of the optimal inheritance model for each SNP was based on identifying the model with the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) values. For rs7274134 in *LINC01427 - LINC00261* and rs6762208 in *SENP2*, the dominant model exhibited the lowest AIC, indicating its suitability for describing the inheritance pattern. Specifically, the risk genotype for IR associated with rs7274134 was (C/T-T/T), with a significant association (P=0.0032, OR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.37-4.96). Similarly, the risk genotype for IR linked to rs6762208 was (A/C-C/C), showing a strong correlation (P=0.0013, OR=3.11; 95% CI: 1.55-6.24). Conversely, for rs920590 in *INTS10* and rs2078267 in *SLC22A11*, the recessive model demonstrated the lowest AIC. In the case of rs920590, the risk genotype (T/T) was identified against the C/C-C/T genotypes for IR, with significant results (P=0.0014; OR=4.01; 95% CI: 1.55-10.34). Similarly, for rs2078267, the T/T genotype was marked as a risk factor compared to the C/C-C/T genotypes, with statistical significance (P=0.0091; OR=3.72; 95% CI: 1.22-11.28). These findings support the role of these genetic markers in predisposing individuals to insulin resistance. Understanding the underlying mechanisms associated with these genetic variants could provide valuable insights into the development of personalised treatment approaches for metabolic disorders in the Indian population. ## DISCUSSION This study investigated the association between specific genetic markers and insulin resistance (IR) among individuals with normal BMI in the Indian population, validating the role of SNPs (rs920590 in *INTS10*, rs7274134 in *LINC01427* - *LINC00261*, rs6762208 in *SENP2*, and rs2078267 in *SLC22A11*) in predisposing individuals to IR. These findings underscore the importance of genetic factors in metabolic dysregulation, validating previous research linking these genetic variants to metabolic traits. ### INTS10 Protein coding gene *INTS10* (Integrator Complex Subunit 10) is a part of the Integrator (INT) complex, which is a complex engaged in the transcription pathway leading to gene expression27. In a diabetic retinopathy study done on mice, it was found that the transcription of *INTS10* in the inner retinal cells of diabetes induced mice was upregulated early, suggesting that *INST10* contributes to diabetic retina due to high insulin resistance28. In another GWAS study carried out on the African population, a polymorphism was reported to be associated with BMI that lies between *INTS10* and *LPL* genes, which the study suggests is a BMI loci29. *LPL* gene has Lipoprotein lipase activity that is crucial in amassing the triglycerides from the blood and storing them in the adipocytes, which is seen more in women than in men30. Serum LPL mass is linked to metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, and ultimately insulin sensitivity, according to a study by Onat et al.31. ### LINC01427 - LINC00261 With more than 200 nucleotides, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a type of significant regulatory RNAs that are involved in a variety of cellular functions in both healthy and pathological conditions.32, 33. They affect translation processes, RNA splicing, stability, chromatin structure and function, and gene transcription. Additionally, they play a role in the formation and regulation of organelles and nuclear condensates34. LncRNAs are classified by their genomic locations. *LINC01427* and *LINC00261* are long intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs), which are located between protein-coding genes35. It has been demonstrated that lncRNA dysregulation occurs in both animal and human pancreatic islets. Numerous long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are connected to the development of insulin resistance (IR) and are engaged in multiple stages of the insulin manufacturing process36, 37. Dysregulated levels of certain lncRNAs in peripheral blood were positively connected with IR, impaired glucose management, inflammation, and transcriptional markers of senescence in a study comparing type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with healthy controls. Even after controlling for confounding variables, there was a substantial correlation established between this dysregulation and type 2 diabetes38. A study by Junpei et al. revealed that a dysregulated lncRNA expression profile is associated with beta cell dysfunction in humans39. Beta cell dysfunction leads to impaired insulin secretion, while diminished responsiveness of target tissues to normally secreted insulin leads to insulin resistance. The failure of beta cell function exacerbates insulin resistance, thereby accelerating the progression of type 2 diabetes40, 33. Research on mice has revealed that a specific long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), called lncSHGL, suppresses gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis in the liver39. When lncSHGL is restored in mice, it improves hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and fat accumulation in obese diabetic mice. Conversely, inhibiting lncSHGL in the liver leads to increased fasting blood sugar and fat buildup in normal mice. These results imply that long non-coding RNAs regulate inflammation and the synthesis of fat, which are critical factors in the initiation and development of insulin resistance and glucose regulation41. ### SENP2 SENP2 belongs to the family of proteolytic enzymes SUMO-specific proteases (*SENPs*) that reverse the effects of sumoylation, which is a post-translational modification that controls the activity and viability of proteins42. Koo YD et al., investigated the role of *SENPs* in energy metabolism. It was found that when a specific muscle cell line was treated with saturated fatty acids, it led to the increase of *SENP2* expression, thereby activating the fatty acid oxidation. Overexpression of *SENP2* in skeletal muscle increased high-fat diet-induced obesity and IR, suggesting a potential therapeutic target for IR-linked metabolic disorders42. The study carried out by Chung SS et al reveals that *SENP2* is crucial in adipogenesis regulation. Its expression increases upon adipocyte differentiation and is dependent on protein kinase A activation43. Knockdown of *SENP2* in mice leads to the reduction of adipogenesis, PPARgamma, and C/EBPalpha mRNA levels. Sumoylation of C/EBPbeta reverses this effect. Overexpression of C/EBPbeta overcomes knockdown’s inhibitory effect on adipogenesis43. Krapf SA et al., studied how (*SENP2*) can influence fatty acid and glucose metabolism in primary adipocytes. The researchers found that silencing of *SENP2* reduced glucose uptake, oxidation and lipogenesis, while increasing lipid oxidation.This suggests that *SENP2* plays a crucial control on energy metabolism in primary human adipocytes44. ### SLC22A11 Studies suggest that elevated uric acid levels can lead to metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, with fructose raising uric acid levels45. The protein-coding gene *SLC22A11*, involved in transporting and excreting uric acid, is linked to nephrolithiasis, uric acid, and gout. Its genes *OAT4* and *URAT1* encode renal urate transporters, significantly affecting Serum Urate46. Insulin regulates cellular processes through various signaling pathways, with serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinases (sgk) acting as mediators47. Sgk increases transport activity and OAT4 expression by overcoming Nedd4–2 inhibitory effects48. Through the action of ubiquitin ligase Nedd4–2, insulin increases OAT4 expression and transport activity. Nedd4–2 specific siRNA is used to knock down Nedd4–2, weakening regulation. Because insulin competes with sgk2 rather than working through sgk2 to regulate OAT4, the effects of insulin and sgk2 are cumulative47. *IGF-1*, a liver hormone, is crucial for metabolism, growth, and development. It increases *OAT4* transport activity and SUMOylation in kidney-derived cells, but PKB-specific inhibitors block its regulation49. The investigation of optimal inheritance models reveals varying modes of genetic inheritance contributing to IR susceptibility. While the recessive model is suitable for rs920590 and rs2078267, the dominant model is favoured for rs7274134 and rs6762208. These findings highlight the complexity of genetic factors influencing IR and the need to consider diverse genetic inheritance patterns in understanding the genetic architecture of metabolic disorders. This study also emphasizes the significance of clinical parameters in understanding IR development. Serum LDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and fat mass exhibit significant associations with IR, indicative of the multifaceted nature of metabolic dysfunction. Combining genomic and clinical data highlights the interaction between hereditary and environmental factors in metabolic health and offers a thorough framework for understanding the pathophysiology of IR50. The validation of genetic markers associated with IR offers insights for personalized therapeutic strategies. By understanding the genetic determinants underlying IR, clinicians can tailor treatment approaches to individual genetic profiles, enhancing the management of metabolic disorders. Identification of novel genetic targets opens avenues for targeted intervention and prevention strategies, paving the way for precision medicine in metabolic health. While this study provides significant insights into IR’s genetic underpinnings, further investigations are warranted to unravel the intricate interplay between genetic and environmental factors contributing to metabolic dysfunction. Longitudinal studies incorporating larger cohorts and diverse populations are needed to validate and extend these findings. Functional studies are required to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed associations and can provide deeper insights into IR’s pathogenesis. Integrating multi-omics approaches offers a comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions driving metabolic health and disease, facilitating the development of targeted therapeutic interventions and precision medicine strategies aimed at mitigating the burden of metabolic disorders. ## Conclusion Based on the comprehensive investigation conducted in this study, several key findings have emerged, shedding light on the genetic underpinnings of Insulin Resistance (IR) in the Indian population. Through the identification of the specific SNPs and their associations with IR risk from the literature, this research validated the SNPs role and their complex role in the underlying mechanisms of metabolic disorders. The analysis revealed significant associations between four selected SNPs (rs920590 in *INTS10*, rs7274134 in *LINC01427 - LINC00261*, rs6762208 in *SENP2*, and rs2078267 in *SLC22A11*) and IR status. Notably, the T allele for rs920590, rs7274134, and rs2078267, as well as the C allele for rs6762208, have been associated with an elevated risk of IR in the Indian population. Furthermore, the determination of optimal inheritance models for each SNP provided additional insights into their genetic inheritance patterns. For instance, the recessive model was identified as the most suitable for rs920590 and rs2078267, while the dominant model was favoured for rs7274134 and rs6762208. These findings suggest varying modes of genetic inheritance contributing to IR susceptibility, highlighting the complexity of genetic factors involved in metabolic dysregulation. The study also highlighted how important it is to consider genetic and clinical factors in determining the etiology of IR and related metabolic disorders. Factors such as serum LDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and fat mass exhibited significant associations with IR, emphasising the multifaceted nature of metabolic dysfunction. This study validates the role of specific genetic markers in predisposing individuals to IR in the Indian population, offering valuable insights into the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. By elucidating the genetic determinants underlying IR, this research lays the foundation for personalised therapeutic strategies tailored to individual genetic profiles, ultimately advancing the management and treatment of metabolic disorders in clinical practice. Further investigations are needed to unravel the intricate interplay between genetic and environmental factors contributing to IR and explore novel avenues for targeted intervention and prevention strategies. ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. [https://www.nugenomics.in/](https://www.nugenomics.in/) ## Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to Answer Genomics for supporting us with the research work. ## Abbreviations (IR) : Insulin resistance (SNPs) : single nucleotide polymorphisms (HOMA2-IR) : Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (GSA) : Global Screening Array (DM) : Diabetes Mellitus (NCDs) : noncommunicable diseases (BMI) : Body mass index (BF%) : body fat percentage (TG) : triglycerides (LDL-C) : high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) : low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC) : total cholesterol (FPG) : and fasting plasma glucose (ORs) : odds ratios (CIs) : confidence intervals (LD) : linkage disequilibrium (HWE) : Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (AIC) : Akaike Information Criterion (BIC) : Bayesian Information Criterion (T2D) : type 2 diabetes * Received August 22, 2024. * Revision received August 22, 2024. * Accepted August 22, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## REFERENCE 1. 1.Ahmed AM. History of diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J. 2002 Apr;23(4):373–8. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic21qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjIzLzQvMzczIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDgvMjIvMjAyNC4wOC4yMi4yNDMxMTYzOC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 2. 2.Karamanou M. Milestones in the history of diabetes mellitus: The main contributors. World Journal of Diabetes. 2016;7(1):1. doi:10.4239/wjd.v7.i1.1 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4239/wjd.v7.i1.1&link_type=DOI) 3. 3.World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 04 4. 4.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2019 5. 5.James M, Varghese TP, Sharma R, Chand S. Association between metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus according to international diabetic federation and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2020 May 5;19(1):437–43. doi:10.1007/s40200-020-00523-2 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s40200-020-00523-2&link_type=DOI) 6. 6.Bays HE, Chapman RH, Grandy S. The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: Comparison of data from two national surveys. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2007 Apr 10;61(5):737–47. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01336.x [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01336.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17493087&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000245608700008&link_type=ISI) 7. 7.Gómez-Ambrosi J, Silva C, Galofré JC, Escalada J, Santos S, Gil MJ, et al. Body adiposity and type 2 diabetes: Increased risk with a high body fat percentage even having a normal BMI. Obesity. 2011 Jul;19(7):1439–44. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.36 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2011.36&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21394093&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 8. 8.Palaniappan LP, Wong EC, Shin JJ, Fortmann SP, Lauderdale DS. Asian Americans have greater prevalence of metabolic syndrome despite Lower Body Mass Index. International Journal of Obesity. 2010 Aug 3;35(3):393–400. doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.152 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ijo.2010.152&link_type=DOI) 9. 9.Ervin, R. B. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003-2006. National health statistics reports 13, 1–8 (2009) 10. 10.Gijbels A, Erdős B, Trouwborst I, Jardon KM, Adriaens ME, Goossens GH, et al. Hepatic insulin resistance and muscle insulin resistance are characterized by distinct postprandial plasma metabolite profiles: A cross-sectional study. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2024 Mar 16;23(1). doi:10.1186/s12933-024-02188-0 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12933-024-02188-0&link_type=DOI) 11. 11.Wahrenberg H, Hertel K, Leijonhufvud B-M, Persson L-G, Toft E, Arner P. Use of waist circumference to predict insulin resistance: Retrospective study. BMJ. 2005 Apr 15;330(7504):1363–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.38429.473310.ae [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMzAvNzUwNC8xMzYzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDgvMjIvMjAyNC4wOC4yMi4yNDMxMTYzOC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 12. 12. Amaia Rodriguez, Victoria Catalan, Javier Gomez-Ambrosi, Gema Fruhbeck. Visceral and subcutaneous adiposity: Are both potential therapeutic targets for tackling the metabolic syndrome? Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2007 Jul 1;13(21):2169–75. doi:10.2174/138161207781039599 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2174/138161207781039599&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17627548&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000248249800005&link_type=ISI) 13. 13.Janiszewski PM, Janssen I, Ross R. Does waist circumference predict diabetes and cardiovascular disease beyond commonly evaluated cardiometabolic risk factors? Diabetes Care. 2007 Dec 1;30(12):3105–9. doi:10.2337/dc07-0945 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMzAvMTIvMzEwNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIyLzIwMjQuMDguMjIuMjQzMTE2MzguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 14. 14.Dervaux N, Wubuli M, Megnien J-L, Chironi G, Simon A. Comparative associations of adiposity measures with cardiometabolic risk burden in asymptomatic subjects. Atherosclerosis. 2008 Dec;201(2):413–7. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.11.032 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.11.032&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18191136&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000262050700024&link_type=ISI) 15. 15.Bosy-Westphal A, Geisler C, Onur S, Korth O, Selberg O, Schrezenmeir J, et al. Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors. International Journal of Obesity. 2005 Nov 1;30(3):475–83. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803144 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.ijo.0803144&link_type=DOI) 16. 16.Shen W, Punyanitya M, Chen J, Gallagher D, Albu J, Pi-Sunyer X, et al. Waist circumference correlates with metabolic syndrome indicators better than percentage fat. Obesity. 2006 Apr;14(4):727–36. doi:10.1038/oby.2006.83 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2006.83&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16741276&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 17. 17.Loos RJ, Kilpeläinen TO. Genes that make you fat, but Keep You Healthy. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018 Oct 2;284(5):450–63. doi:10.1111/joim.12827 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/joim.12827&link_type=DOI) 18. 18.[https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/](https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/) 19. 19.Lin Y-Y, Hsu W-Y, Yen C-E, Hu S-W. Association of Dental fluorosis and urinary fluoride with intelligence among schoolchildren. Children. 2023 May 31;10(6):987. doi:10.3390/children10060987 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/children10060987&link_type=DOI) 20. 20.[https://www.calculator.net/pdf/navy-physical-readiness-program.pdf](https://www.calculator.net/pdf/navy-physical-readiness-program.pdf) 21. 21.Declaration of Helsinki 2008 – WMA – The World Medical Association 22. 22.Infinium Global Screening Array-24 Kit | Population-scale genetics ([illumina.com](http://illumina.com)) 23. 23.GenomeStudio Software ([illumina.com](http://illumina.com)) 24. 24.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81. [http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/](http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/) 25. 25.SNPStats: your web tool for SNP analysis [https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm](https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm) 26. 26.Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC. (2003) Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics, 19(1):149–150. [https://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/gpc/](https://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/gpc/) [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12499305&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180463900021&link_type=ISI) 27. 27.Baillat D, Hakimi M-A, Näär AM, Shilatifard A, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Integrator, a multiprotein mediator of small nuclear RNA processing, associates with the C-terminal repeat of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 2005 Oct;123(2):265–76. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.019 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.019&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16239144&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000232794100013&link_type=ISI) 28. 28.Kirwin SJ, Kanaly ST, Hansen CR, Cairns BJ, Ren M, Edelman JL. Retinal gene expression and visually evoked behavior in diabetic long Evans Rats. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011 Sept 28;52(10):7654. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6609 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiaW92cyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiNTIvMTAvNzY1NCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIyLzIwMjQuMDguMjIuMjQzMTE2MzguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 29. 29.Ng MC, Graff M, Lu Y, Justice AE, Mudgal P, Liu C-T, et al. Discovery and fine-mapping of adiposity loci using high density imputation of genome-wide association studies in individuals of African ancestry: African ancestry Anthropometry Genetics Consortium. PLOS Genetics. 2017 Apr 21;13(4). doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006719 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006719&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Votruba SB, Jensen MD. Sex differences in abdominal, gluteal, and thigh LPL activity. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007 Jun;292(6). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00601.2006 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1152/ajpendo.00601.2006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17311894&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000247939100037&link_type=ISI) 31. 31.Onat A, Hergenç G, Agırbaşlı M, Kaya Z, Can G, Ünaltuna NE. Preheparin serum lipoprotein lipase mass interacts with gender, gene polymorphism and, positively, with smoking. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2009 Jan 1;47(2). doi:10.1515/cclm.2009.018 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/cclm.2009.018&link_type=DOI) 32. 32.Gao N, Li Y, Li J, Gao Z, Yang Z, Li Y, et al. Long non-coding RNAS: The regulatory mechanisms, research strategies, and future directions in cancers. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020 Dec 18;10. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.598817 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fonc.2020.598817&link_type=DOI) 33. 33.Wang J, Yang W, Chen Z, Chen J, Meng Y, Feng B, et al. Long noncoding RNA LNCSHGL recruits HNRNPA1 to suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. Diabetes. 2018 Jan 30;67(4):581–93. doi:10.2337/db17-0799 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZGlhYmV0ZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNjcvNC81ODEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOC8yMi8yMDI0LjA4LjIyLjI0MzExNjM4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 34. 34.Statello L, Guo C-J, Chen L-L, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAS and its biological functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2020 Dec 22;22(2):96–118. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9&link_type=DOI) 35. 35.Mathy NW, Chen X-M. Long non-coding RNAS (lncrnas) and their transcriptional control of inflammatory responses. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2017 Jul;292(30):12375–82. doi:10.1074/jbc.r116.760884 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamJjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIyOTIvMzAvMTIzNzUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOC8yMi8yMDI0LjA4LjIyLjI0MzExNjM4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 36. 36.Knoll M, Lodish HF, Sun L. Long non-coding RNAS as regulators of the endocrine system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2015 Jan 6;11(3):151–60. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2014.229 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrendo.2014.229&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25560704&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 37. 37.Guo J, Liu Z, Gong R. Long noncoding RNA: An emerging player in diabetes and diabetic kidney disease. Clinical Science. 2019 Jun;133(12):1321–39. doi:10.1042/cs20190372 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToicHBjbGluc2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMzMvMTIvMTMyMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIyLzIwMjQuMDguMjIuMjQzMTE2MzguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 38. 38.Formichi C, Nigi L, Grieco GE, Maccora C, Fignani D, Brusco N, et al. Non-coding RNAS: Novel players in insulin resistance and related diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021 Jul 19;22(14):7716. doi:10.3390/ijms22147716 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijms22147716&link_type=DOI) 39. 39.Wang J, Yang W, Chen Z, Chen J, Meng Y, Feng B, et al. Long noncoding RNA LNCSHGL recruits HNRNPA1 to suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. Diabetes. 2018 Jan 30;67(4):581–93. doi:10.2337/db17-0799 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZGlhYmV0ZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNjcvNC81ODEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOC8yMi8yMDI0LjA4LjIyLjI0MzExNjM4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 40. 40.Cerf ME. Beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2013;4. doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00037 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fendo.2013.00037&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23542897&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 41. 41.Guo W-H, Guo Q, Liu Y-L, Yan D-D, Jin L, Zhang R, et al. Mutated lncrna increase the risk of type 2 diabetes by promoting β cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Cell Death & Disease. 2022 Oct 27;13(10). doi:10.1038/s41419-022-05348-w [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41419-022-05348-w&link_type=DOI) 42. 42.Koo YD, Choi JW, Kim M, Chae S, Ahn BY, Kim M, et al. Sumo-specific protease 2 (SENP2) is an important regulator of fatty acid metabolism in skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2015 Mar 17;64(7):2420–31. doi:10.2337/db15-0115 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZGlhYmV0ZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNjQvNy8yNDIwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDgvMjIvMjAyNC4wOC4yMi4yNDMxMTYzOC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 43. 43.Chung SS, Ahn BY, Kim M, Choi HH, Park HS, Kang S, et al. Control of adipogenesis by the sumo-specific protease SENP2. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010 May 1;30(9):2135–46. doi:10.1128/mcb.00852-09 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoibWNiIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjMwLzkvMjEzNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIyLzIwMjQuMDguMjIuMjQzMTE2MzguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 44. 44.Krapf SA, Lund J, Bakke HG, Nyman TA, Bartesaghi S, Peng X-R, et al. SENP2 knockdown in human adipocytes reduces glucose metabolism and lipid accumulation, while increases lipid oxidation. Metabolism Open. 2023 Jun;18:100234. doi:10.1016/j.metop.2023.100234 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.metop.2023.100234&link_type=DOI) 45. 45.Hu X, Rong S, Wang Q, Sun T, Bao W, Chen L, et al. Association between plasma uric acid and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: A Mendelian randomization analysis. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2021 Jan;171:108542. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108542 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108542&link_type=DOI) 46. 46.Köttgen A, Albrecht E, Teumer A, Vitart V, Krumsiek J, Hundertmark C, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations. Nature Genetics. 2012 Dec 23;45(2):145–54. doi:10.1038/ng.2500 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.2500&link_type=DOI) 47. 47.Wang H, Xu D, Toh MF, Pao AC, You G. Serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK2 regulates human organic anion transporters 4 via ubiquitin ligase NEDD4-2. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2016 Feb;102:120–9. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2015.11.024 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bcp.2015.11.024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26740304&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 48. 48.Wang H, Zhang J, You G. The mechanistic links between insulin and human organic anion transporter 4. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2019 Jan;555:165–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.040 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.040&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30453017&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F22%2F2024.08.22.24311638.atom) 49. 49.Yu Z, Wang H, You G. The regulation of human organic anion transporter 4 by insulin-like growth factor 1 and protein kinase B signaling. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2023 Sept;215:115702. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115702 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115702&link_type=DOI) 50. 50.Mao X, Mao S, Sun H, Huang F, Wang Y, Zhang D, et al. Causal associations between modifiable risk factors and pancreatitis: A comprehensive mendelian randomization study. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023 Mar 14;14. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1091780 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fimmu.2023.1091780&link_type=DOI)