Severe disease is not essential for a high neutralizing antibody response post-SARS-CoV-2 infection
===================================================================================================

* Afrah Khairallah
* Zesuliwe Jule
* Alice Piller
* Mallory Bernstein
* Kajal Reedoy
* Yashica Ganga
* Bernadett I. Gosnell
* Farina Karim
* Yunus Moosa
* Thumbi Ndung’u
* Khadija Khan
* Alex Sigal

## Abstract

Neutralizing antibody responses correlate with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection, yet higher neutralizing responses associate with more severe disease. Whether people without severe disease can also develop strong neutralizing responses to infection, and the pathways involved, is less clear. We performed a proteomic analysis on sera from 71 individuals infected with ancestral SARS-CoV-2, enrolled during the first South African infection wave. We determined disease severity by whether participants required supplemental oxygen and measured neutralizing antibody levels at convalescence. High neutralizing antibodies were associated with high disease severity, yet 40% of participants with lower disease severity had neutralizing antibody levels comparable to those with severe disease. We found 130 differentially expressed proteins between high and low neutralizers and 40 between people with high versus low disease severity. Five proteins overlapped, including furin, a protease which enhances SARS-CoV-2 infection. High neutralizers with non-severe disease had similar levels of differentially expressed neutralization response proteins to high neutralizers with severe disease, yet similar levels of differentially expressed disease severity proteins to participants with non-severe disease. Furthermore, we could reasonably predict who developed a strong neutralizing response based on a single protein, HSPA8, involved in clathrin pit uncoating. These results indicate that a strong antibody response does not always require severe disease and may involve different pathways.

## Introduction

Many transient viral infections elicit a neutralizing antibody response which not only helps to clear the virus, but also protects convalescent individual from re-infection1. This has been shown for SARS-CoV-2, and until the Omicron variant emerged, re-infection was rare2. Binding of neutralizing antibodies prevents the viral spike protein from accessing the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) viral receptor3. Neutralizing antibody levels strongly correlate with the degree of vaccine mediated protection4–7.

Factors predisposing to higher disease severity and mortality in Covid-19 include male sex, diabetes, hypertension, and HIV22. Higher disease severity results in higher neutralizing antibody levels in SARS-CoV-2 infection8–19. In contrast, asymptomatic infection associates with a low neutralizing antibody response20,21. This opens the question of whether severe disease is necessary for a robust antibody response. An alternative is that both are driven by shared factors such as high viral titers or prolonged infection23. Given that severe Covid-19 is due to lower respiratory tract infection, which causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from aberrant inflammation interfering with gas exchange24,25, it is possible that a more controlled immune response could avoid ARDS while still being sufficiently robust to elicit high neutralizing antibody levels.

Here, we asked whether severe Covid-19 is required for high neutralizing antibody levels post-infection. To avoid confounding the results with re-infection and vaccination, we selected individuals from our cohort26 who were infected by ancestral SARS-CoV-2 in the first Covid-19 infection wave in South Africa, before vaccination was available and variants arose. Given the rarity of reinfection pre-Omicron27, the infections we studied were very likely first exposures to SARS-CoV-2. We separated participants with Covid-19 into higher severity versus lower severity by whether participants required supplemental oxygen. The requirement for supplemental oxygen is a key measure in ordinal scales like that used by the World Health Organization28. We used proteomics to examine the differentially regulated proteins and pathways in people with different combinations of disease severity and antibody response.

We observed that, while higher severity cases tended to make strong antibody responses, a subset of participants with more mild disease who did not require supplemental oxygen also showed high neutralizing antibody levels. There was minor overlap between the differentially expressed proteins associated with severity versus those associated with the neutralizing antibody response. Additionally, levels of heat shock protein family A member 8 (HSPA8) emerged as predictive of neutralizing responses.

## Results

### Cohort characteristics

We enrolled 72 participants infected during the first SARS-CoV-2 infection wave in Durban South Africa lasting from March to October 202029 (Figure 1, Table 1). One participant in the cohort had immunosuppression due to advanced HIV disease with a CD4 count of 6 at enrollment and an HIV viral load of 34,151 copies/mL. This participant did not make a neutralizing antibody response and had persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, as described in our previous work29–31. Because of the outlier immune state, we excluded this participant from further analysis and analyzed results for 71 participants.

![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F1)

Figure 1: Study design and timeline.
Study participants were enrolled in the first South African SARS-CoV-2 infection wave between March and October 2020, where enrollment was a median of 6 days post-diagnosis. At enrollment, disease severity was assessed by whether a participant required supplemental oxygen. During this visit, a blood draw was performed, and blood plasma used for proteomic analysis using SomaScan proteomics. At 28 days post-enrollment, a second blood draw was performed, and blood plasma was used in a live virus neutralization assay against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 to assess neutralization capacity.

View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/T1)

Table 1: Participant characteristics and comparison of non-severe vs severe groups.

We scored disease severity by whether the participant required supplemental oxygen26,28. Participants were classified into the less severe (no supplemental oxygen) and more severe (supplemental oxygen) groups. For brevity, we refer to these groups as “non-severe” and “severe”, although we recognize there may be gradations of severity within each group. Demographics and comorbidities were recorded. We determined HIV status, HIV viral load, and CD4 T cell concentrations in the blood. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed by qPCR. Participants were enrolled a median of 6 days (IQR 4-8 days) post-diagnosis. A quantitative SARS-CoV-2 titer was not available. We performed the first sampling at enrollment (Figure 1). This sample was used for proteomic analysis as well as to measure lymphocytes, neutrophils, CD4 T cell numbers, HIV status, and HIV viral load.

A second sample was taken a median of 32 days (IQR 17-35 days) post-diagnosis, at a time when the infection elicited antibody response should be close to its peak16. This sample was used to measure neutralizing antibody levels by a live virus focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT32,33). Fifty-five participants (76%) were determined to have non-severe disease because they did not require supplemental oxygen, and 17 (24%) were classified as severe. People living with HIV (PLWH) accounted for 47% of the participants, reflecting the high HIV prevalence in the province of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa where Durban is located34.

CD4 T cell count was a median of 590 cells/µL (IQR 340-940) at enrollment over the entire participant group and was significantly lower (p=0.0072 by the Mann-Whitney U test, Table 1) in the severe (380 cells/µL, IQR 270-590) relative to the non-severe (700 cells/µL, IQR 470-1100) group. The lower CD4 count in severe disease is expected because severe disease often results in lymphopenia35–37. The CD4 count increased upon convalescence at the second visit to a median of 830 cells/µL (IQR 510-1100), and there was no significant difference between the severe (820 cells/µL, IQR 530-1100) and non-severe (840 cells/µL, IQR 390-900) groups (Table 1).

Increased neutrophils are associated with severe disease26,37–39 and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly higher in the severe group in the first visit (4.2 vs. 1.9, p=0.04 by the Mann-Whitney U test, see Table 1). The NLR dropped and was similar in both groups at the second, convalescence visit (Table 1). The severe group had significantly higher levels of neutralizing antibodies, as measured by the FRNT50, which is the inverse serum dilution in the FRNT assay required to neutralize 50% of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1).

### Categorization of participants into high and low neutralizers and association with risk factors

We used the median FRNT50 neutralization level (FRNT50=358) to categorize participants into high and low neutralizers. Our justification for using the median is that it is simple yet gives two groups which are strongly distinct in neutralization capacity: Geometric mean titer (GMT) FRNT50 values were 1348 in the high neutralizer group (n=35) versus 46 in the low neutralizer group (n=36), a 29-fold drop (Figure 2A). The number of participants in the non-severe disease group was 55, out of which 33 were low neutralizers, while 22 were high neutralizers (Table 2). Out of the 16 participants in the high severity group, 13 were high neutralizers while the remaining 3 were low neutralizers (Table 2).

![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F2)

Figure 2: 
Neutralization capacity associates with disease severity but not HIV status. (A) Participants were divided into high and low neutralizers based on whether the participant’s plasma showed higher or lower neutralizing capacity relative to the median neutralization FRNT50 of all participants. For all plots, y-axis shows FRNT50, with bar and error bars representing the geometric mean and geometric standard deviation of each group. The horizontal dashed red line marks the limit of quantification (the inverse of the highest plasma concentration used). (B) Participants in the high and low neutralization groups who required supplemental oxygen (red points). Inset shows frequency of participants on supplemental oxygen in each group (p=0.0046 by Fisher’s exact test). (C) High and low neutralizers who had a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) greater than 6. Inset: frequency of high NLR in each group (p=0.011 by Fisher’s exact test). (D) High and low neutralizers who had a comorbidity of diabetes, hypertension, or both. Inset: frequency of comorbidities in each group (p=0.00018 by Fisher’s exact test). (E) High and low neutralizers who were male. Inset: frequency of males in each group (p=0.042 by Fisher’s exact test). (F) High and low neutralizers who were people living with HIV (PLWH). Inset: frequency of PLWH in each group (not significant by Fisher’s exact test). (G) Univariate and (H) multivariate logistic regression odds ratios for odds of having a high neutralization response.

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/T2)

Table 2: Participant numbers in neutralization-severity combinations.

The frequency of participants with high disease severity was significantly higher in the high neutralization group relative to the low neutralization group (p=0.0046 by Fisher’s Exact test, Figure 2B). However, as presented in Table 2, the majority of the 35 participants in the high neutralizer group were non-severe (22 participants, versus 13 with high severity). There was no significant difference in neutralizing antibody levels between participants with high disease severity and high neutralizers with low disease severity (Figure S1).

![Figure S1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F8.medium.gif)

[Figure S1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F8)

Figure S1: Comparison of neutralization capacity of high neutralizers with low severity to participants with high disease severity.
The y-axis shows FRNT50, with bar and error bars representing the geometric mean and geometric standard deviation of each group. The horizontal dashed red line marks the limit of quantification (the inverse of the highest plasma concentration used). p-value by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.

High NLR, comorbidities, and being male was associated with higher neutralization in univariate analysis. The frequency of individuals with high NLR (>6)38, was significantly higher in the high neutralization group (p=0.011 by Fisher’s Exact test, Figure 2C). The frequency of individuals with recorded comorbidities (hypertension and/or diabetes) was also significantly higher in the high neutralizer group (p=0.00018 by Fisher’s Exact test, Figure 2D). Males were significantly more frequent among the high neutralizers (p=0.042 by Fisher’s Exact test, Figure 2E). In contrast, there was no significant difference between the frequency of PLWH versus HIV negative people between the high and low neutralizer groups (Figure 2F). Univariate analysis showed significantly increased odds (odds ratio (OR) >1) of being a high neutralizer with severe disease, comorbidities, high NLR, and being male (Figure 2G). In multivariate analysis, only severe disease and comorbidities remained significant (Figure 2H, with exact numbers and confidence intervals in Table S1). People who both required supplemental oxygen and had comorbidities appeared only in the high neutralizer group (Figure S2). However, the largest subgroup in the high neutralizer group consisted of people with non-severe disease without comorbidities (Figure S2).

![Figure S2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F9.medium.gif)

[Figure S2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F9)

Figure S2: Overlap of comorbidities and requirement for supplemental oxygen in high versus low neutralizers.
Participants not requiring supplemental oxygen and having neither diabetes nor hypertension are marked in blue, those requiring supplemental oxygen but without diabetes or hypertension are in red, participants with diabetes or hypertension comorbidities only are in yellow, and those requiring both supplemental oxygen and with diabetes or hypertension comorbidities are in green. Inset shows relative frequencies of the four groups in high versus low neutralizers.

View this table:
[Table S1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/T3)

Table S1: Logistic regression analysis results.

### Differentially expressed proteins between high and low neutralizers

We used SomaScan proteomics40 to determine the levels of ∼5000 proteins in participant plasma from the blood sample collected at enrollment. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified as those with a ≥1.5-fold decrease or increase in mean expression in one group relative to the other, with a p-value corrected by the false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.0541–43. We obtained 130 significant DEPs when comparing the high versus the low neutralizer groups (Figure 3A) and 40 DEPs when comparing the non-severe versus the severe disease groups (Figure 3B).

![Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F3)

Figure 3: Differentially expressed proteins in neutralization and disease severity.
Volcano plots show fold-change versus false discovery rate (FDR) values for each protein in two comparisons: (A) High neutralizers compared to low neutralizers; (B) severe versus non-severe disease. The x-axis represents the log fold-change between the mean protein level values in the group of high versus low neutralizers or high versus low disease severity. Y-axis is the −log10 transformed FDR. The vertical lines indicate ±1.5-fold change and the horizontal line FDR=0.05. Significantly differentially expressed proteins are labeled in red (upregulated), blue (downregulated), and green (shared between responses). (C) Venn diagram showing the number of differentially expressed proteins associated with neutralization capacity and disease severity and common to both.

Examples of DEPs with higher levels in high versus low neutralizers (Figure 3A) included HSPA8, also called HSC7044. This protein is a chaperone from the HSP70 family of constitutively expressed heat shock proteins and has multiple functions including clathrin uncoating during clathrin-mediated endocytosis45, antigen presentation on MHC class II molecules44,46, and autophagy44. It interacts with proteins from multiple viruses, including the SARS-CoV-2 spike47, the influenza M148, and the papillomavirus L249 proteins. Another DEP with significantly higher levels in high neutralizers was von Willebrand factor (VWF), involved in orchestrating the coagulation response47.

Furin was an example of a significant DEP in severe versus non-severe disease (Figure 3B). Furin is a protease which promotes SARS-CoV-2 cellular infection by cleaving the S1/S2 polybasic site and therefore facilitating viral fusion50. Furin was also elevated in high versus low neutralizers. Another infection promoting factor with higher levels in the high disease severity group was Calpain-2 (CAPN2), involved in positively regulating the cell surface levels of the ACE2 receptor 51.

Only five DEPs were found to overlap between the neutralization and disease severity conditions (Figure 3C, proteins marked in green in Figure 3A-B). Upregulated DEPs in common to both high neutralization and high disease severity were furin, DNAse1L2, and endoplasmic reticulum protein 44 (Erp44). Downregulated DEPs in common were anthrax toxin receptor-2 (ANTXR2) and amyloid beta precursor like protein 1 (APLP1). DNAse1L2 has been shown to be transcriptionally activated by inflammatory cytokines52 resulting from infection. Erp44, a protein from the thioredoxin family, is upregulated by endoplasmic reticulum stress53 and has been reported to be a target of SARS-CoV-2 ORF854. ANTXR2, the receptor for the anthrax toxin, is involved in angiogenesis and cell adhesion55. APLP1 is required for glucose homeostasis56, and its downregulation is associated with neurological symptoms of Covid-1957.

### Gene set enrichment analysis of differentially regulated pathways in neutralization and disease severity

We used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)58 to determine the differentially regulated pathways between high and low neutralizers and participants with severe versus non-severe disease (Figure 4). We used the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) Hallmark gene set59 and a significance threshold of FDR <0.1 to determine significantly enriched pathways.

![Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F4.medium.gif)

[Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F4)

Figure 4. Significantly regulated pathways for neutralization and disease severity.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) results for significantly up or downregulated pathways in participants with high neutralization versus low capacity and those with severe versus non-severe disease. The x-axis represents the Normalized Enrichment Score (NES). Each circle represents a pathway, with the size of the circle corresponding to the -log10(FDR) value, with larger circles indicating higher significance. Purple circles represent pathways enriched in the high neutralization group and orange circles represent pathways enriched in the severe disease group. One pathway (fatty acid metabolism) is shared between both groups.

We found 7 upregulated pathways and 1 downregulated pathway in high versus low neutralizers. We found 4 upregulated pathways and 1 downregulated pathway in severe versus non-severe participants. There was one upregulated pathway in common.

In high neutralizers, the upregulated pathways were adipogenesis, the interferon-α (IFN-α) response, PI3k/Akt/mTOR signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, mTORC1 signaling, and xenobiotic metabolism. The downregulated pathway was hedgehog signaling. The pathways upregulated in the high versus low severity groups were glycolysis, the UV response, and the unfolded protein response. Spermatogenesis was downregulated. Similarly to analysis of individual DEPs, there was no extensive overlap in the pathways between responses. The single pathway upregulated in common between the high versus low neutralizers and severe versus non-severe disease was fatty acid metabolism.

### High neutralizers showed similar DEP levels regardless of severity

To better understand differences between high neutralizers with severe versus non-severe disease, we examined the top 20 most significant by FDR DEPs in the neutralization response to determine whether they are similarly or differently regulated in high neutralizers with high versus low disease severity (Figure 5). They included fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP), a serine protease involved in tissue remodeling60, motilin (MLN), a hormone promoting gastrointestinal motility61, and ribosome-binding protein 1 (RRBP1), involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response62.

![Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F5.medium.gif)

[Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F5)

Figure 5: Top differentially expressed proteins in the neutralization response show similar expression in high neutralizers regardless of disease severity.
Median Z-score normalized protein levels of the top 20 differentially expressed proteins by FDR are shown for the high neutralizers with severe disease, high neutralizers with non-severe disease, and low neutralizers. Fourteen out of the 20 proteins (left) show no significant difference between the high neutralizers with severe disease versus high neutralizers with non-severe disease. Six proteins (right) show significantly higher levels in high neutralizers with severe disease relative to high neutralizers with non-severe disease. However, the levels of these proteins in low neutralizers are significantly lower still. P-values by the Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple hypothesis correction between group values per protein.

In 14 of these DEPs including FAP, MLN, and RRBP1, levels were not significantly different between high neutralizers with non-severe disease and high neutralizers with severe disease. Both groups had a significantly different level of DEPs relative to the low neutralizer group (Figure 5). For the remaining six proteins, the high neutralizer group with non-severe disease displayed intermediate expression, between high neutralizers with severe disease and the low neutralizers. This group included 3 of the 5 proteins which were in common between the neutralization response and disease severity (furin, ANTXR2, and DNAse1L2), as well as VWF and HSPA8. These results indicate that high neutralizers have levels of the 20 most significant neutralization related DEPs which are generally similar regardless of disease severity.

### HSPA8 level predicts whether infection will elicit high levels of neutralizing antibodies

We investigated whether we could predict strong neutralizing antibody responses based on the DEPs significantly associated with neutralization level. Participants were split into training (60%, n=42) and test (40%, n=29) groups. Significantly regulated proteins were determined by the same FDR and fold-change cut-off as used in the full set analysis (FDR<0.05, fold change≥1.5), resulting in 12 significantly regulated proteins in the neutralization response in the training set (Figure S3). Repeated stepwise regression using bootstrapping was performed to rank the predictive power of each of the 12 proteins by iteratively subtracting or adding each of the proteins from/to the model. Stepwise regression was performed until the Akaike information criterion (AIC), a measure of the trade-off between goodness-of-fit and model complexity was optimized. The top three predictive proteins in order of significance were HSPA8, MLN, and FAP. They were combined in a multivariate logistic regression model (Figure 6A) and analyzed singly in univariate regression (Figure 6B-D).

![Figure S3:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F10.medium.gif)

[Figure S3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F10)

Figure S3: Significantly differentially expressed proteins in the training set.
Volcano plots show fold change versus false discovery rate (FDR) values for each protein. The x-axis represents the log fold-change between the mean protein level values in the group of high versus low neutralizers or high versus low disease severity. Y-axis is the −log10 transformed FDR. The vertical lines indicate ±1.5-fold change and the horizontal line FDR=0.05. Significantly differentially expressed proteins are labeled in red (upregulated) or blue (downregulated). The proteins showing highest predictive value in the model are highlighted in purple.

![Figure 6:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F6.medium.gif)

[Figure 6:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F6)

Figure 6: Predictive models classifying participants into high versus low neutralization groups.
Shown are ROC curves for (A) multivariate (HSPA8+FAP+MLN), (B) HSPA8, (C) FAP, and (D) MLN. Areas Under the Curve (AUC) were 0.91 (multivariate), 0.86 (HSP8A), 0.84 (FAP), and 0.79 (MLN). Dashed diagonal line represents the performance of a random classifier with AUC=0.50.

The combination of HSPA8, MLN, and FAP resulted in good discrimination between high neutralizers versus low neutralizers, showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 (Figure 6A). Using HSPA8 alone, the model could reasonably distinguish between low and high neutralization outcomes in the test group (AUC=0.86, p=0.0018, Figure 6B). The predictive power of FAP (AUC=0.84) and MLN (AUC=0.79) was slightly lower (Figure 6C-D).

### Similar severity related protein levels in high and low neutralizers with non-severe disease

Lastly, to test whether the similarity in disease severity between low and high neutralizers with non-severe disease was supported by the similarity in protein expression of severity-related proteins, we examined the top 20 significant by FDR proteins that were differentially expressed in the severe versus the non-severe groups. Included in this group was CAPN2, which increases the levels of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE251, and CD79A, a marker of B cell activation reported to be upregulated upon SARS-CoV-2 infection63.

We found that for 16 out of the top 20 DEPs examined, the expression level was not significantly different between the high and low neutralizers among the participants with non-severe disease (Figure 7). In addition, in all but two of the 16 proteins, there was a significant difference between both the high and low neutralizers with non-severe disease and the severe disease group. In 3 out of the remaining 4 DEPs which did not follow this pattern (furin, ANTXR2, and DNAse1L2), the non-severe high neutralizers had intermediate protein levels which fell between the non-severe low neutralizers and the severe disease group. Interestingly, these DEPs were also common to both the severity and neutralization responses (Figure 3A-B). The fourth DEP, olfactomedin 2 (OLFM2), a protein mostly expressed in neurons and found to regulate metabolism64, did not show a significant difference between the non-severe high neutralizers and the severe disease group (Figure 7). These results indicate that, for the majority of the top 20 DEPs by significance which distinguished severe from non-severe disease participants, levels were similar between non-severe participants, regardless of participant neutralization capacity.

![Figure 7:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F7.medium.gif)

[Figure 7:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/21/2024.08.21.24312063/F7)

Figure 7: Top differentially expressed proteins in the disease severity response show similar expression regardless of neutralization capacity.
Median Z-score normalized protein of the top 20 differentially expressed proteins by FDR are shown for the high severity group and the low severity group, with the latter divided into high and low neutralizers. Sixteen out of the 20 proteins (left) show no significant difference between non-severe high versus low neutralizers. Three proteins (middle-right) show levels in the low severity, high neutralizer group which are intermediate between participants with high severity and low severity and low neutralization. Levels of the remaining one protein show no significant difference between participants with severe disease and high neutralizers with non-severe disease. p-values by the Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple hypothesis correction between group values per protein.

## Discussion

We investigated disease severity, proteomic profiles, and infection-elicited neutralizing antibody levels in a cohort of 71 South African people infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the first ancestral SARS-CoV-2 infection wave. We stratified our cohort into severe and non-severe disease based on whether participants required supplemental oxygen and separated participants into high neutralizers and low neutralizers at convalescence based on their plasma neutralization capacity of ancestral SARS-CoV-2. We found that high disease severity and comorbidities were significantly associated with high neutralization capacity. However, there were participants with non-severe disease who had had similarly high neutralizing antibody levels to those with severe disease. These non-severe high neutralizers showed similar differentially expressed neutralization response protein levels to high neutralizers with severe disease. Meanwhile, their levels of differentially expressed proteins involved in disease severity were similar to participants with non-severe disease.

The enriched pathways we observed in high versus low neutralizers were generally associated with viral replication or the immune response. These included the interferon-α (IFN-α) response, a key part of the innate immune response to viral infections, with rapid production of IFN-α triggering antiviral and pro-inflammatory effects65; PI3k/Akt/mTOR signaling, which is is a mediator of cell cycle progression and cell survival66, with activation increasing viral replication67–69; Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), the process by which mitochondria generate ATP, with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to promote OXPHOS and increases ATP production70; the mTORC1 pathway, a metabolic regulator of cell growth71, with mTORC1 inhibitors shown to reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication72; hedgehog signaling, involved in development, cell proliferation, survival, and immune regulation, and modulated by multiple viruses73; fatty acid metabolism, the pathway in common between the neutralization response and disease severity, essential for the replication of enveloped viruses74–76. The other enriched pathways in the neutralization response may be associated with higher disease severity, although they do not come up as enriched pathways in the severe versus non-severe disease analysis: adipogenesis, associated with obesity, a known risk factor for severe Covid-1977–80, and upregulation of xenobiotic metabolism, which may indicate the presence of pharmacological interventions81.

Like with the neutralization response, the enriched pathways in severe versus non-severe disease show links to SARS-CoV-2 replication. However, some make sense as consequences of severe disease independently of such replication. Thus, the upregulated pathway of glycolysis increases the replication of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses82–84. However, hypoxia, which may have been present in participants with respiratory distress who required supplemental oxygen, also results in a metabolic switch from mitochondrial respiration to increased glycolysis85. The unfolded protein response may be upregulated because of the increased production of improperly folded proteins due to ER stress during SARS-CoV-2 cellular infection86. Interestingly, ER stress and misfolded proteins have also been linked to autoimmune disease87, which has been reported to be elevated post-Covid-1988. Upregulation of proteins involved in the UV response may be because SARS-CoV-2 induces cell cycle arrest to gain cellular resources89. Decreased spermatogenesis, on the other hand, has been previously shown to be a consequence of severe Covid-19 leading to death91.

For the neutralization response, differentially expressed proteins were measured at an earlier point in time than the neutralizing antibody response is thought to develop92. Therefore, they may be predictive. We found that three proteins, HSPA8, MLN, and FAP, could predict who will be high neutralizers. The best single protein predictor was HSPA8. This protein has multiple roles in cellular homeostasis, including a key role in the uncoating of endocytosed clathrin vesicles93. Interestingly, clathrin mediated endocytosis is a major cellular infection pathway for SARS-CoV-294 and facilitation of this process by HSPA8 may increase viral replication. In addition, HSPA8 has an important role in antigen presentation on MHC class II molecules44,46, a necessary step in the CD4 helper T cell - B cell interactions which are responsible for the production of effective neutralizing antibodies95.

There was minor overlap between differentially expressed proteins and pathways involved in the neutralization response and the disease severity response. The minor overlap argues against the direct dependence of neutralizing antibody levels on disease severity and supports the proposition that a common factor such as high or prolonged viral replication results in both higher infection-elicited neutralization capacity and higher disease severity. However, a limitation to this conclusion is that, because of small group sizes, some differentially expressed proteins did not reach statistical significance in the disease severity response. For example, coagulation factor VWF was significantly higher in high neutralizers (FDR = 0.0001) but narrowly missed statistical significance in disease severity (FDR = 0.055). VWF was previously reported to be upregulated in high disease severity96. A second limitation is that our single measure, the requirement for supplemental oxygen, does not capture the range of more versus less severe disease, and therefore disease severity for some participants is misclassified. Nevertheless, while supplemental oxygen is not a perfect measure, most people with severe disease have respiratory failure, although they may die from multiorgan failure or other reasons97,98. The presence of non-severe high neutralizers, who have similar neutralization response related protein profiles to severe high neutralizers, may mean that high disease severity is not essential to elicit a robust neutralizing antibody response.

## Methods

### Informed consent and ethical statement

This was an observational study with longitudinal sample collection. The nasopharyngeal swab used to isolate ancestral SARS-CoV-2 as well as all blood samples were obtained after written informed consent from adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection enrolled in a prospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals at the Africa Health Research Institute. The study protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (reference BREC/00001275/2020). Participants were reimbursed for each visit based on time, inconvenience and expenses as approved in the protocol.

### Clinical laboratory testing

CD4 T cell count and HIV viral load quantification were performed from a 4mL EDTA tube of blood at an accredited diagnostic laboratory (Ampath for CD4 and Molecular Diagnostic Services for HIV viral load, both based in Durban, South Africa).

### Cells

The VeroE6 cells expressing TMPRSS2 and ACE2 (Vero E6-TMPRSS2), originally BEI Resources, NR-54970, were used for virus expansion and live virus neutralization assays. The cell line was propagated in growth medium consisting of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco 41965-039) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, SV30160.03) containing 10mM of hydroxyethylpiperazine ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES, Lonza, 17-737E), 1mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco, 11360-039), 2mM L-glutamine (Lonza BE17-605E) and 0.1mM nonessential amino acids (Lonza 13-114E).

### Live virus neutralization assay (focus reduction neutralization assay)

For all neutralization assays, viral input was 100 focus forming units per well of a 96-well plate. VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells were plated in a 96-well plate (Corning) at 30,000 cells per well 1 day pre-infection. Plasma was separated from EDTA-anticoagulated blood by centrifugation at 500 × *g* for 10 min and stored at −80 °C. Aliquots of plasma samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 minutes and clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 minutes. Virus stocks were added to serially diluted plasma in a 96-well plate (Corning) and antibody–virus mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were infected with 100 μL of the virus–antibody mixtures for 1 h, then 100 μL of a 1X RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, R6504), 1.5% carboxymethylcellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, C4888) overlay was added without removing the inoculum. Cells were fixed 20 h post-infection using 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich, P6148) for 20 min. Foci were stained with a rabbit anti-spike monoclonal antibody (BS-R2B12, GenScript A02058) at 0.5 μg/mL in a permeabilization buffer containing 0.1% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, S7900), 0.1% BSA (Biowest, P6154) and 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, P9416) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature with shaking, then washed with wash buffer containing 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS. Secondary goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugated antibody (Abcam ab205718) was added at 1 μg/mL and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with shaking. TrueBlue peroxidase substrate (SeraCare 5510-0030) was then added at 50 μL per well and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Plates were imaged in an ImmunoSpot Ultra-V S6-02-6140 Analyzer ELISPOT instrument with BioSpot Professional built-in image analysis (C.T.L).

### Statistics and fitting

All statistics were performed in GraphPad Prism version 9.4.1. All fitting to determine FRNT50 and linear regression was performed using custom code in MATLAB v.2019b (FRNT50) or the fit lm function for linear regression, which was also used to determine goodness-of-fit (R2) as well as p-value by F-test of the linear model. Limits of quantification were between 1:25 (most concentrated plasma used and 1:3200 (most dilute plasma used)

Neutralization data were fit to: ![Formula][1]</img>  

Here Tx is the number of foci at plasma dilution D normalized to the number of foci in the absence of plasma on the same plate. ID50 is the plasma dilution, giving 50% neutralization. FRNT50 = 1/ID50. Values of FRNT50 <1 are set to 1 (undiluted), the lowest measurable value. We note that FRNT50 < 25 or FRNT50 > 3200 fell outside of the dilution series used and were extrapolated from the fit.

### Plasma proteomic profiling

Proteomic analysis of the plasma samples was performed by SomaLogic, Inc. (Boulder, CO, USA) using the SomaScan v4.0 platform99. The SomaScan measures were reported as relative fluorescence units (RFU) in a summary ADAT file. These data were then merged with our metadata. Quantile normalization and log transformation were performed on all RFU-reported data to ensure comparability and normalization across samples.

### Differential protein analysis

The proteome changes attributable to both neutralization capacity and disease severity were derived from comparisons between individuals with high versus low neutralization capacity and severe versus non-severe outcomes, respectively. Protein data were log-transformed before testing the difference in means between comparison groups using the Student’s t-test. P-values were corrected to control for the false discovery rate (FDR)100. The absolute fold change was rounded up to one decimal place (i.e, fold change values between 1.4 and 1.5 were rounded to 1.5). Proteins with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and absolute fold change ≥1.5 were considered differentially expressed. These differentially expressed proteins were then visualized using a volcano plot in the R Project for statistical computing and graphical representation.

### Gene set enrichment analysis

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using the Broad Institute GSEA software version 4.3.358,101, the MSigDB Hallmark gene sets (v2023.2), and the UniProt Human Collection chip platform. The GSEA software was downloaded from [https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/downloads.jsp](https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/downloads.jsp), and GSEA was performed using default parameter settings except for Number of permutations = 10,000; Permutation type = gene_set; 10 ≤ gene set size ≤ 500.

### Analysis of top variable proteins in the neutralization and severity responses

The top 20 variable proteins from the differential protein analysis of the neutralization response were selected based on FDR value. The proteins were standardized using Z-score normalization, where the mean level of a given protein is subtracted from each value of that protein, and the difference is divided by the protein’s standard deviation. Pairwise differences in median protein levels between high neutralizers with severe disease, high neutralizers with non-severe disease, and low neutralizers (severe and non-severe) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests, with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Adjusted p-values < 0.05 were marked as significant. Outliers (absolute Z-score > 3) were included in the analysis but excluded from the plot for clarity of the visualization. The same analysis was carried out on the top 20 variable proteins in the severity response, except pairwise differences assessed were between severe disease (high and low neutralizers), non-severe high neutralizers, and non-severe low neutralizers.

### Logistic regression prediction model of neutralization outcome

Participants were split into training (60%, n=42) and testing (40%, n=29) sets. To identify a subset of proteins with the most potential predictive power of neutralization outcome, the training data were subjected to differential protein analysis as described above. This yielded 12 significantly differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between high and low neutralizers in the training data. The protein data in the training and testing sets were log-transformed and scaled by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation, with the mean and standard deviation of the training data used for both the training and testing sets. Using bootstrapping (1000 iterations with 100 participant values drawn with replacement per iteration), the neutralization response was iteratively modeled against the 12 DEPs and subjected to forward and backward stepwise regression, selecting the most significant predictors in a regression model by adding (forward) or subtracting (backward) predictors in a stepwise manner, optimizing for Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). With each bootstrap iteration, the proteins selected by stepwise regression were added to a running tally, which served to rank the predictive power of the 12 DEPs upon completion of the bootstrapping. Neutralization response was fitted against the top three ranked proteins, MLN, FAP, and HSPA8, in a binomial logistic regression model, which was trained using the training data. The performance of this multivariate model and the constituent univariate models was assessed using the testing data of ROC curves, and AUC statistics were generated using the R pROC package.

## Author contributions

A.S., A.K., and K.K. conceived the study and designed the study and experiments. Z.J., K.R. Y.G., B.I.G, F.K., Y.M., and K.K identified and provided samples and performed the neutralization experiments. T.N. provided resources. A.P., A.K., and A.S., and M.B. analyzed the data. A.S., A.P., and A.K. prepared the manuscript with input from all authors.

## Data Availability

Sequence of isolated SARS-CoV-2 used in this study has been deposited in GISAID and GenBank with accession numbers EPI\_ISL\_602626.1 (GISAID), OP090658 (GenBank). It is available upon reasonable request. All R-scripts used in the analysis have been deposited to GitHub ([https://github.com/Afrah-Khairallah/Omics](https://github.com/Afrah-Khairallah/Omics)-).

## Funding

This study was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates award INV-018944 (AS) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Global Health Discovery Collaboratory.

## Acknowledgements

We thank Clare Paterson and the team at SomaLogic for performing the proteomics and for helpful comments on the manuscript.

*   Received August 21, 2024.
*   Revision received August 21, 2024.
*   Accepted August 21, 2024.


*   © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  Goldblatt, D., Alter, G., Crotty, S. & Plotkin, S. A. Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Immunol Rev 310, 6–26 (2022). PMC9348242. doi:10.1111/imr.13091
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/imr.13091&link_type=DOI) 

2.  Pulliam, J. R. C., van Schalkwyk, C., Govender, N., von Gottberg, A., Cohen, C., Groome, M. J., Dushoff, J., Mlisana, K. & Moultrie, H. Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa. Science 376, eabn4947 (2022). PMC8995029. doi:10.1126/science.abn4947
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1126/science.abn4947&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35289632&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

3.  Barnes, C. O., Jette, C. A., Abernathy, M. E., Dam, K. A., Esswein, S. R., Gristick, H. B., Malyutin, A. G., Sharaf, N. G., Huey-Tubman, K. E., Lee, Y. E., Robbiani, D. F., Nussenzweig, M. C., West, A. P., Jr. & Bjorkman, P. J. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies. Nature 588, 682–687 (2020). PMC8092461. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2852-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-020-2852-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33045718&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

4.  Khoury, D. S., Cromer, D., Reynaldi, A., Schlub, T. E., Wheatley, A. K., Juno, J. A., Subbarao, K., Kent, S. J., Triccas, J. A. & Davenport, M. P. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 27, 1205–1211 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34002089&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

5.  Cromer, D., Steain, M., Reynaldi, A., Schlub, T. E., Wheatley, A. K., Juno, J. A., Kent, S. J., Triccas, J. A., Khoury, D. S. & Davenport, M. P. Neutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta-analysis. The Lancet Microbe 3, e52–e61 (2022).
    
    

6.  Earle, K. A., Ambrosino, D. M., Fiore-Gartland, A., Goldblatt, D., Gilbert, P. B., Siber, G. R., Dull, P. & Plotkin, S. A. Evidence for antibody as a protective correlate for COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine 39, 4423–4428 (2021). PMC8142841. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.063
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.063&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34210573&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

7.  Cromer, D., Steain, M., Reynaldi, A., Schlub, T. E., Khan, S. R., Sasson, S. C., Kent, S. J., Khoury, D. S. & Davenport, M. P. Predicting vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 over time and against variants: a meta-analysis. Nat Commun 14, 1633 (2023). PMC10036966. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37176-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-023-37176-7&link_type=DOI) 

8.  Garcia-Beltran, W. F., Lam, E. C., Astudillo, M. G., Yang, D., Miller, T. E., Feldman, J., Hauser, B. M., Caradonna, T. M., Clayton, K. L., Nitido, A. D., Murali, M. R., Alter, G., Charles, R. C., Dighe, A., Branda, J. A., Lennerz, J. K., Lingwood, D., Schmidt, A. G., Iafrate, A. J. & Balazs, A. B. COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival. Cell 184, 476–488.e411 (2021). PMC7837114. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.015
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.015&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33412089&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

9.  Lucas, C., Klein, J., Sundaram, M. E., Liu, F., Wong, P., Silva, J., Mao, T., Oh, J. E., Mohanty, S., Huang, J., Tokuyama, M., Lu, P., Venkataraman, A., Park, A., Israelow, B., Vogels, C. B. F., Muenker, M. C., Chang, C. H., Casanovas-Massana, A., Moore, A. J., Zell, J., Fournier, J. B., Obaid, A., Robertson, A. J., Lu-Culligan, A., Zhao, A., Nelson, A., Brito, A., Nunez, A., Martin, A., Watkins, A. E., Geng, B., Chun, C. J., Kalinich, C. C., Harden, C. A., Todeasa, C., Jensen, C., Dorgay, C. E., Kim, D., McDonald, D., Shepard, D., Courchaine, E., White, E. B., Song, E., Silva, E., Kudo, E., DeIuliis, G., Rahming, H., Park, H.-J., Matos, I., Ott, I., Nouws, J., Valdez, J., Fauver, J., Lim, J., Rose, K.-A., Anastasio, K., Brower, K., Glick, L., Sharma, L., Sewanan, L., Knaggs, L., Minasyan, M., Batsu, M., Petrone, M., Kuang, M., Nakahata, M., Linehan, M., Askenase, M. H., Simonov, M., Smolgovsky, M., Balkcom, N. C., Sonnert, N., Naushad, N., Vijayakumar, P., Martinello, R., Datta, R., Handoko, R., Bermejo, S., Prophet, S., Bickerton, S., Velazquez, S., Alpert, T., Rice, T., Khoury-Hanold, W., Peng, X., Yang, Y., Cao, Y., Strong, Y., Lin, Z., Wyllie, A. L., Campbell, M., Lee, A. I., Chun, H. J., Grubaugh, N. D., Schulz, W. L., Farhadian, S., Dela Cruz, C., Ring, A. M., Shaw, A. C., Wisnewski, A. V., Yildirim, I., Ko, A. I., Omer, S. B., Iwasaki, A. & Yale, I. R. T. Delayed production of neutralizing antibodies correlates with fatal COVID-19. Nature Medicine 27, 1178–1186 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01355-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41591-021-01355-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33953384&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

10. Chen, X., Pan, Z., Yue, S., Yu, F., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Li, R., Liu, B., Yang, X., Gao, L., Li, Z., Lin, Y., Huang, Q., Xu, L., Tang, J., Hu, L., Zhao, J., Liu, P., Zhang, G., Chen, Y., Deng, K. & Ye, L. Disease severity dictates SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibody responses in COVID-19. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 5, 180 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00301-9
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-020-00301-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32879307&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

11. Trinité, B., Tarrés-Freixas, F., Rodon, J., Pradenas, E., Urrea, V., Marfil, S., Rodríguez de la Concepción, M. L., Ávila-Nieto, C., Aguilar-Gurrieri, C., Barajas, A., Ortiz, R., Paredes, R., Mateu, L., Valencia, A., Guallar, V., Ruiz, L., Grau, E., Massanella, M., Puig, J., Chamorro, A., Izquierdo-Useros, N., Segalés, J., Clotet, B., Carrillo, J., Vergara-Alert, J. & Blanco, J. SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits a rapid neutralizing antibody response that correlates with disease severity. Scientific Reports 11, 2608 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81862-9
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-021-81862-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33510275&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

12. Lau, E. H. Y., Tsang, O. T. Y., Hui, D. S. C., Kwan, M. Y. W., Chan, W.-h., Chiu, S. S., Ko, R. L. W., Chan, K. H., Cheng, S. M. S., Perera, R. A. P. M., Cowling, B. J., Poon, L. L. M. & Peiris, M. Neutralizing antibody titres in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nature Communications 12, 63 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20247-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-020-20247-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33397909&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

13. Seow, J., Graham, C., Merrick, B., Acors, S., Pickering, S., Steel, K. J. A., Hemmings, O., O’Byrne, A., Kouphou, N., Galao, R. P., Betancor, G., Wilson, H. D., Signell, A. W., Winstone, H., Kerridge, C., Huettner, I., Jimenez-Guardeño, J. M., Lista, M. J., Temperton, N., Snell, L. B., Bisnauthsing, K., Moore, A., Green, A., Martinez, L., Stokes, B., Honey, J., Izquierdo-Barras, A., Arbane, G., Patel, A., Tan, M. K. I., O’Connell, L., O’Hara, G., MacMahon, E., Douthwaite, S., Nebbia, G., Batra, R., Martinez-Nunez, R., Shankar-Hari, M., Edgeworth, J. D., Neil, S. J. D., Malim, M. H. & Doores, K. J. Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Nature Microbiology 5, 1598–1607 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41564-020-00813-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41564-020-00813-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33106674&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

14. Legros, V., Denolly, S., Vogrig, M., Boson, B., Siret, E., Rigaill, J., Pillet, S., Grattard, F., Gonzalo, S., Verhoeven, P., Allatif, O., Berthelot, P., Pélissier, C., Thiery, G., Botelho-Nevers, E., Millet, G., Morel, J., Paul, S., Walzer, T., Cosset, F.-L., Bourlet, T. & Pozzetto, B. A longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients reveals a high correlation between neutralizing antibodies and COVID-19 severity. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 18, 318–327 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41423-020-00588-2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41423-020-00588-2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33408342&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

15. Schlickeiser, S., Schwarz, T., Steiner, S., Wittke, K., Al Besher, N., Meyer, O., Kalus, U., Pruß, A., Kurth, F., Zoller, T., Witzenrath, M., Sander, L. E., Müller, M. A., Scheibenbogen, C., Volk, H. D., Drosten, C., Corman, V. M. & Hanitsch, L. G. Disease Severity, Fever, Age, and Sex Correlate With SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Responses. Front Immunol 11, 628971 (2020). PMC7878374. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.628971
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fimmu.2020.628971&link_type=DOI) 

16. Xu, X., Nie, S., Wang, Y., Long, Q., Zhu, H., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Zeng, Q., Zhao, J., Liu, L., Li, L., Huang, A., Hou, J. & Hou, F. F. Dynamics of neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: an observational study. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6, 197 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00611-6
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-021-00611-6&link_type=DOI) 

17. Kim, Y., Bae, J.-Y., Kwon, K., Chang, H.-H., Lee, W. K., Park, H., Kim, J., Choi, I., Park, M.-S. & Kim, S.-W. Kinetics of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection according to sex, age, and disease severity. Scientific Reports 12, 13491 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17605-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-022-17605-1&link_type=DOI) 

18. Boonyaratanakornkit, J., Morishima, C., Selke, S., Zamora, D., McGuffin, S., Shapiro, A. E., Campbell, V. L., McClurkan, C. L., Jing, L., Gross, R., Liang, J., Postnikova, E., Mazur, S., Lukin, V. V., Chaudhary, A., Das, M. K., Fink, S. L., Bryan, A., Greninger, A. L., Jerome, K. R., Holbrook, M. R., Gernsheimer, T. B., Wener, M. H., Wald, A. & Koelle, D. M. Clinical, laboratory, and temporal predictors of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor candidates. J Clin Invest 131 (2021). PMC7843229. doi:10.1172/jci144930
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/jci144930&link_type=DOI) 

19. Klein, S. L., Pekosz, A., Park, H. S., Ursin, R. L., Shapiro, J. R., Benner, S. E., Littlefield, K., Kumar, S., Naik, H. M., Betenbaugh, M. J., Shrestha, R., Wu, A. A., Hughes, R. M., Burgess, I., Caturegli, P., Laeyendecker, O., Quinn, T. C., Sullivan, D., Shoham, S., Redd, A. D., Bloch, E. M., Casadevall, A. & Tobian, A. A. Sex, age, and hospitalization drive antibody responses in a COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor population. J Clin Invest 130, 6141–6150 (2020). PMC7598041. doi:10.1172/jci142004
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/jci142004&link_type=DOI) 

20. Sui, Z., Dai, X., Lu, Q., Zhang, Y., Huang, M., Li, S., Peng, T., Xie, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., Xia, J., Dong, L., Yang, J., Huang, W., Liu, S., Wang, Z., Li, K., Yang, Q., Zhou, X., Wu, Y., Liu, W., Fang, X. & Peng, K. Viral dynamics and antibody responses in people with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6, 181 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00596-2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-021-00596-2&link_type=DOI) 

21. Long, Q. X., Tang, X. J., Shi, Q. L., Li, Q., Deng, H. J., Yuan, J., Hu, J. L., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Lv, F. J., Su, K., Zhang, F., Gong, J., Wu, B., Liu, X. M., Li, J. J., Qiu, J. F., Chen, J. & Huang, A. L. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med 26, 1200–1204 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32555424&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

22. Western Cape Department of Health in collaboration with the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, S. A. Risk Factors for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Death in a Population Cohort Study from the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Clin Infect Dis 73, e2005–e2015 (2021). PMC7499501. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1198
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciaa1198&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32860699&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

23. Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Sang, L., Ye, F., Ruan, S., Zhong, B., Song, T., Alshukairi, A. N., Chen, R., Zhang, Z., Gan, M., Zhu, A., Huang, Y., Luo, L., Mok, C. K. P., Al Gethamy, M. M., Tan, H., Li, Z., Huang, X., Li, F., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Wen, L., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Zhuang, Z., Zhuo, J., Chen, C., Kuang, L., Wang, J., Lv, H., Jiang, Y., Li, M., Lin, Y., Deng, Y., Tang, L., Liang, J., Huang, J., Perlman, S., Zhong, N., Zhao, J., Malik Peiris, J. S., Li, Y. & Zhao, J. Kinetics of viral load and antibody response in relation to COVID-19 severity. J Clin Invest 130, 5235–5244 (2020). PMC7524490. doi:10.1172/jci138759
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/jci138759&link_type=DOI) 

24. Lamers, M. M. & Haagmans, B. L. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 20, 270–284 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00713-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41579-022-00713-0&link_type=DOI) 

25. Varga, Z., Flammer, A. J., Steiger, P., Haberecker, M., Andermatt, R., Zinkernagel, A. S., Mehra, M. R., Schuepbach, R. A., Ruschitzka, F. & Moch, H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 395, 1417–1418 (2020). PMC7172722. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30937-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30937-5&link_type=DOI) 

26. Karim, F., Gazy, I., Cele, S., Zungu, Y., Krause, R., Bernstein, M., Khan, K., Ganga, Y., Rodel, H., Mthabela, N., Mazibuko, M., Muema, D., Ramjit, D., Ndung’u, T., Hanekom, W., Gosnell, B., Team, C.-K., Lessells, R. J., Wong, E. B., de Oliveira, T., Moosa, M. S., Lustig, G., Leslie, A., Kloverpris, H. & Sigal, A. HIV status alters disease severity and immune cell responses in Beta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection wave. Elife 10 (2021). PMC8676326. doi:10.7554/eLife.67397
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7554/eLife.67397&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34608862&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

27. Bekker, L. G., Garrett, N., Goga, A., Fairall, L., Reddy, T., Yende-Zuma, N., Kassanjee, R., Collie, S., Sanne, I., Boulle, A., Seocharan, I., Engelbrecht, I., Davies, M. A., Champion, J., Chen, T., Bennett, S., Mametja, S., Semenya, M., Moultrie, H., de Oliveira, T., Lessells, R. J., Cohen, C., Jassat, W., Groome, M., Von Gottberg, A., Le Roux, E., Khuto, K., Barouch, D., Mahomed, H., Wolmarans, M., Rousseau, P., Bradshaw, D., Mulder, M., Opie, J., Louw, V., Jacobson, B., Rowji, P., Peter, J. G., Takalani, A., Odhiambo, J., Mayat, F., Takuva, S., Corey, L. & Gray, G. E. Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine in health-care workers in South Africa (the Sisonke study): results from a single-arm, open-label, phase 3B, implementation study. Lancet 399, 1141–1153 (2022). PMC8930006. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00007-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00007-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35305740&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

28. Rubio-Rivas, M., Mora-Luján, J. M., Formiga, F., Arévalo-Cañas, C., Lebrón Ramos, J. M., Villalba García, M. V., Fonseca Aizpuru, E. M., Díez-Manglano, J., Arnalich Fernández, F., Romero Cabrera, J. L., García García, G. M., Pesqueira Fontan, P. M., Vargas Núñez, J. A., Freire Castro, S. J., Loureiro Amigo, J., Pascual Pérez, M. L. R., Alcalá Pedrajas, J. N., Encinas-Sánchez, D., Mella Pérez, C., Ena, J., Gracia Gutiérrez, A., Esteban Giner, M. J., Varona, J. F., Millán Núñez-Cortés, J. & Casas-Rojo, J. M. WHO Ordinal Scale and Inflammation Risk Categories in COVID-19. Comparative Study of the Severity Scales. J Gen Intern Med 37, 1980–1987 (2022). PMC8992782. doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07511-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11606-022-07511-7&link_type=DOI) 

29. Cele, S., Karim, F., Lustig, G., San, J. E., Hermanus, T., Tegally, H., Snyman, J., Moyo-Gwete, T., Wilkinson, E., Bernstein, M., Khan, K., Hwa, S. H., Tilles, S. W., Singh, L., Giandhari, J., Mthabela, N., Mazibuko, M., Ganga, Y., Gosnell, B. I., Karim, S. S. A., Hanekom, W., Van Voorhis, W. C., Ndung’u, T., Team, C.-K., Lessells, R. J., Moore, P. L., Moosa, M. S., de Oliveira, T. & Sigal, A. SARS-CoV-2 prolonged infection during advanced HIV disease evolves extensive immune escape. Cell Host Microbe 30, 154–162 e155 (2022). PMC8758318. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.005
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.005&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

30. Karim, F., Moosa, M. Y., Gosnell, B., Sandile, C., Giandhari, J., Pillay, S., Tegally, H., Wilkinson, E., San, E. J. & Msomi, N. Persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and intra-host evolution in association with advanced HIV infection. medRxiv (2021).
    
    

31. Karim, F., Riou, C., Bernstein, M., Jule, Z., Lustig, G., van Graan, S., Keeton, R. S., Upton, J.-L., Ganga, Y., Khan, K., Reedoy, K., Mazibuko, M., Govender, K., Thambu, K., Ngcobo, N., Venter, E., Makhado, Z., Hanekom, W., von Gottberg, A., Hoque, M., Karim, Q. A., Abdool Karim, S. S., Manickchund, N., Magula, N., Gosnell, B. I., Lessells, R. J., Moore, P. L., Burgers, W. A., de Oliveira, T., Moosa, M.-Y. S. & Sigal, A. Clearance of persistent SARS-CoV-2 associates with increased neutralizing antibodies in advanced HIV disease post-ART initiation. Nature Communications 15, 2360 (2024). doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46673-2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-024-46673-2&link_type=DOI) 

32. Cele, S., Gazy, I., Jackson, L., Hwa, S. H., Tegally, H., Lustig, G., Giandhari, J., Pillay, S., Wilkinson, E., Naidoo, Y., Karim, F., Ganga, Y., Khan, K., Bernstein, M., Balazs, A. B., Gosnell, B. I., Hanekom, W., Moosa, M. S., Network for Genomic Surveillance in South, A., Team, C.-K., Lessells, R. J., de Oliveira, T. & Sigal, A. Escape of SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 from neutralization by convalescent plasma. Nature 593, 142–146 (2021). PMC9867906. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03471-w
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-021-03471-w&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33780970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

33. Cele, S., Jackson, L., Khoury, D. S., Khan, K., Moyo-Gwete, T., Tegally, H., San, J. E., Cromer, D., Scheepers, C., Amoako, D. G., Karim, F., Bernstein, M., Lustig, G., Archary, D., Smith, M., Ganga, Y., Jule, Z., Reedoy, K., Hwa, S. H., Giandhari, J., Blackburn, J. M., Gosnell, B. I., Abdool Karim, S. S., Hanekom, W., Ngs, S. A., Team, C.-K., von Gottberg, A., Bhiman, J. N., Lessells, R. J., Moosa, M. S., Davenport, M. P., de Oliveira, T., Moore, P. L. & Sigal, A. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 602, 654–656 (2022). PMC8866126. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35016196&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

34. Kharsany, A. B. M., Cawood, C., Khanyile, D., Lewis, L., Grobler, A., Puren, A., Govender, K., George, G., Beckett, S., Samsunder, N., Madurai, S., Toledo, C., Chipeta, Z., Glenshaw, M., Hersey, S. & Abdool Karim, Q. Community-based HIV prevalence in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: results of a cross-sectional household survey. Lancet HIV 5, e427–e437 (2018). PMC7498647. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30104-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30104-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30021700&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

35. Shouman, S., El-Kholy, N., Hussien, A. E., El-Derby, A. M., Magdy, S., Abou-Shanab, A. M., Elmehrath, A. O., Abdelwaly, A., Helal, M. & El-Badri, N. SARS-CoV-2-associated lymphopenia: possible mechanisms and the role of CD147. Cell Communication and Signaling 22, 349 (2024). doi:10.1186/s12964-024-01718-3
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12964-024-01718-3&link_type=DOI) 

36. Zou, Z.-y., Ren, D., Chen, R.-l., Yu, B.-j., Liu, Y., Huang, J.-j., Yang, Z.-j., Zhou, Z.-p., Feng, Y.-w. & Wu, M. Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of COVID-19 predicts acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Inflammation 19, 20587392211036825 (2021). doi:10.1177/20587392211036825
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/20587392211036825&link_type=DOI) 

37. Qin, C., Zhou, L., Hu, Z., Zhang, S., Yang, S., Tao, Y., Xie, C., Ma, K., Shang, K., Wang, W. & Tian, D.-S. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clinical Infectious Diseases 71, 762–768 (2020). doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa248
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciaa248&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32161940&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

38. Li, X., Liu, C., Mao, Z., Xiao, M., Wang, L., Qi, S. & Zhou, F. Predictive values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 24, 647 (2020). PMC7667659. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03374-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13054-020-03374-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

39. Prebensen, C., Lefol, Y., Myhre, P. L., Lüders, T., Jonassen, C., Blomfeldt, A., Omland, T., Nilsen, H. & Berdal, J.-E. Longitudinal whole blood transcriptomic analysis characterizes neutrophil activation and interferon signaling in moderate and severe COVID-19. Scientific Reports 13, 10368 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37606-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-023-37606-y&link_type=DOI) 

40. Pietzner, M., Wheeler, E., Carrasco-Zanini, J., Raffler, J., Kerrison, N. D., Oerton, E., Auyeung, V. P. W., Luan, J. a., Finan, C., Casas, J. P., Ostroff, R., Williams, S. A., Kastenmüller, G., Ralser, M., Gamazon, E. R., Wareham, N. J., Hingorani, A. D. & Langenberg, C. Genetic architecture of host proteins involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature Communications 11, 6397 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19996-z
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-020-19996-z&link_type=DOI) 

41. Yang, J., Chen, C., Chen, W., Huang, L., Fu, Z., Ye, K., Lv, L., Nong, Z., Zhou, X., Lu, W. & Zhong, M. Proteomics and metabonomics analyses of Covid-19 complications in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Scientific Reports 11, 14601 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94256-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598&link_type=DOI) 

42. Dunn, J., Ferluga, S., Sharma, V., Futschik, M., Hilton, D. A., Adams, C. L., Lasonder, E. & Hanemann, C. O. Proteomic analysis discovers the differential expression of novel proteins and phosphoproteins in meningioma including NEK9, HK2 and SET and deregulation of RNA metabolism. EBioMedicine 40, 77–91 (2019). PMC6412084. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.048
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.048&link_type=DOI) 

43. Liu, W., Xie, L., He, Y.-H., Wu, Z.-Y., Liu, L.-X., Bai, X.-F., Deng, D.-X., Xu, X.-E., Liao, L.-D., Lin, W., Heng, J.-H., Xu, X., Peng, L., Huang, Q.-F., Li, C.-Y., Zhang, Z.-D., Wang, W., Zhang, G.-R., Gao, X., Wang, S.-H., Li, C.-Q., Xu, L.-Y., Liu, W. & Li, E.-M. Large-scale and high-resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling defines molecular subtypes of esophageal cancer for therapeutic targeting. Nature Communications 12, 4961 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25202-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-021-25202-5&link_type=DOI) 

44. Stricher, F., Macri, C., Ruff, M. & Muller, S. HSPA8/HSC70 chaperone protein. Autophagy 9, 1937–1954 (2013). doi:10.4161/auto.26448
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4161/auto.26448&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24121476&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000328299800003&link_type=ISI) 

45. Chappell, T. G., Welch, W. J., Schlossman, D. M., Palter, K. B., Schlesinger, M. J. & Rothman, J. E. Uncoating ATPase is a member of the 70 kilodalton family of stress proteins. Cell 45, 3–13 (1986). doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90532-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0092-8674(86)90532-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2937542&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986A896100001&link_type=ISI) 

46. Panjwani, N., Akbari, O., Garcia, S., Brazil, M. & Stockinger, B. The HSC73 Molecular Chaperone: Involvement in MHC Class II Antigen Presentation. The Journal of Immunology 163, 1936–1942 (1999). doi:10.4049/jimmunol.163.4.1936
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4049/jimmunol.163.4.1936&link_type=DOI) 

47. Navhaya, L. T., Blessing, D. M., Yamkela, M., Godlo, S. & Makhoba, X. H. A comprehensive review of the interaction between COVID-19 spike proteins with mammalian small and major heat shock proteins. Biomolecular Concepts 15 (2024). doi:10.1515/bmc-2022-0027
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/bmc-2022-0027&link_type=DOI) 

48. Watanabe, K., Fuse, T., Asano, I., Tsukahara, F., Maru, Y., Nagata, K., Kitazato, K. & Kobayashi, N. Identification of Hsc70 as an influenza virus matrix protein (M1) binding factor involved in the virus life cycle. FEBS Lett 580, 5785–5790 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.09.040
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.febslet.2006.09.040&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17022977&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

49. Florin, L., Becker, K. A., Sapp, C., Lambert, C., Sirma, H., Müller, M., Streeck, R. E. & Sapp, M. Nuclear translocation of papillomavirus minor capsid protein L2 requires Hsc70. J Virol 78, 5546–5553 (2004). PMC415841. doi:10.1128/jvi.78.11.5546-5553.2004
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoianZpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI3OC8xMS81NTQ2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDgvMjEvMjAyNC4wOC4yMS4yNDMxMjA2My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

50. Johnson, B. A., Xie, X., Bailey, A. L., Kalveram, B., Lokugamage, K. G., Muruato, A., Zou, J., Zhang, X., Juelich, T., Smith, J. K., Zhang, L., Bopp, N., Schindewolf, C., Vu, M., Vanderheiden, A., Winkler, E. S., Swetnam, D., Plante, J. A., Aguilar, P., Plante, K. S., Popov, V., Lee, B., Weaver, S. C., Suthar, M. S., Routh, A. L., Ren, P., Ku, Z., An, Z., Debbink, K., Diamond, M. S., Shi, P. Y., Freiberg, A. N. & Menachery, V. D. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 591, 293–299 (2021). PMC8175039. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03237-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-021-03237-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33494095&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

51. Zeng, Q., Antia, A., Casorla-Perez, L. A., Puray-Chavez, M., Kutluay, S. B., Ciorba, M. A. & Ding, S. Calpain-2 mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry via regulating ACE2 levels. mBio 15, e02287–02223 (2024). doi:10.1128/mbio.02287-23
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1128/mbio.02287-23&link_type=DOI) 

52. Shiokawa, D., Matsushita, T., Kobayashi, T., Matsumoto, Y. & Tanuma, S.-i. Characterization of the human DNAS1L2 gene and the molecular mechanism for its transcriptional activation induced by inflammatory cytokines. Genomics 84, 95–105 (2004).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.02.003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15203207&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000222458400009&link_type=ISI) 

53. Anelli, T., Alessio, M., Mezghrani, A., Simmen, T., Talamo, F., Bachi, A. & Sitia, R. ERp44, a novel endoplasmic reticulum folding assistant of the thioredoxin family. The EMBO Journal 21, 835–844 (2002). doi:10.1093/emboj/21.4.835
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZW1ib2pubCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIyMS80LzgzNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIxLzIwMjQuMDguMjEuMjQzMTIwNjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

54. Liu, P., Wang, X., Sun, Y., Zhao, H., Cheng, F., Wang, J., Yang, F., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, C.-c. & Wang, L. SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 reshapes the ER through forming mixed disulfides with ER oxidoreductases. Redox Biology 54, 102388 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.redox.2022.102388
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.redox.2022.102388&link_type=DOI) 

55. Sun, J. & Jacquez, P. Roles of Anthrax Toxin Receptor 2 in Anthrax Toxin Membrane Insertion and Pore Formation. Toxins (Basel*)* 8, 34 (2016). PMC4773787. doi:10.3390/toxins8020034
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/toxins8020034&link_type=DOI) 

56. Needham, B. E., Wlodek, M. E., Ciccotosto, G. D., Fam, B. C., Masters, C. L., Proietto, J., Andrikopoulos, S. & Cappai, R. Identification of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its homologue APLP2 as essential modulators of glucose and insulin homeostasis and growth. J Pathol 215, 155–163 (2008). doi:10.1002/path.2343
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/path.2343&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18393365&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000256456900008&link_type=ISI) 

57. Chen, J., Chen, J., Lei, Z., Zhang, F., Zeng, L. H., Wu, X., Li, S. & Tan, J. Amyloid precursor protein facilitates SARS-CoV-2 virus entry into cells and enhances amyloid-β-associated pathology in APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry 13, 396 (2023). PMC10725492. doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02692-z
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41398-023-02692-z&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=38104129&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

58. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R. & Lander, E. S. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTAyLzQzLzE1NTQ1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDgvMjEvMjAyNC4wOC4yMS4yNDMxMjA2My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

59. Liberzon, A., Birger, C., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Ghandi, M., Mesirov, J. P. & Tamayo, P. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cell systems 1, 417–425 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.CELS.2015.12.004&link_type=DOI) 

60. Fitzgerald, A. A. & Weiner, L. M. The role of fibroblast activation protein in health and malignancy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 39, 783–803 (2020). PMC7487063. doi:10.1007/s10555-020-09909-3
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10555-020-09909-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32601975&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

61. Deloose, E., Verbeure, W., Depoortere, I. & Tack, J. Motilin: from gastric motility stimulation to hunger signalling. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 15, 238–250 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0155-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41574-019-0155-0&link_type=DOI) 

62. Tsai, H. Y., Yang, Y. F., Wu, A. T., Yang, C. J., Liu, Y. P., Jan, Y. H., Lee, C. H., Hsiao, Y. W., Yeh, C. T., Shen, C. N., Lu, P. J., Huang, M. S. & Hsiao, M. Endoplasmic reticulum ribosome-binding protein 1 (RRBP1) overexpression is frequently found in lung cancer patients and alleviates intracellular stress-induced apoptosis through the enhancement of GRP78. Oncogene 32, 4921–4931 (2013). doi:10.1038/onc.2012.514
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/onc.2012.514&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23318453&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

63. McClain, M. T., Constantine, F. J., Henao, R., Liu, Y., Tsalik, E. L., Burke, T. W., Steinbrink, J. M., Petzold, E., Nicholson, B. P., Rolfe, R., Kraft, B. D., Kelly, M. S., Saban, D. R., Yu, C., Shen, X., Ko, E. M., Sempowski, G. D., Denny, T. N., Ginsburg, G. S. & Woods, C. W. Dysregulated transcriptional responses to SARS-CoV-2 in the periphery. Nature Communications 12, 1079 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21289-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-021-21289-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33597532&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

64. González-García, I., Freire-Agulleiro, Ó., Nakaya, N., Ortega, F. J., Garrido-Gil, P., Liñares-Pose, L., Fernø, J., Labandeira-Garcia, J. L., Diéguez, C., Sultana, A., Tomarev, S. I., Fernández-Real, J. M. & López, M. Olfactomedin 2 deficiency protects against diet-induced obesity. Metabolism 129, 155122 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2021.155122
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.metabol.2021.155122&link_type=DOI) 

65. Kim, Y.-M. & Shin, E.-C. Type I and III interferon responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 53, 750–760 (2021). doi:10.1038/s12276-021-00592-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s12276-021-00592-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33953323&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

66. Glaviano, A., Foo, A. S. C., Lam, H. Y., Yap, K. C. H., Jacot, W., Jones, R. H., Eng, H., Nair, M. G., Makvandi, P., Geoerger, B., Kulke, M. H., Baird, R. D., Prabhu, J. S., Carbone, D., Pecoraro, C., Teh, D. B. L., Sethi, G., Cavalieri, V., Lin, K. H., Javidi-Sharifi, N. R., Toska, E., Davids, M. S., Brown, J. R., Diana, P., Stebbing, J., Fruman, D. A. & Kumar, A. P. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling transduction pathway and targeted therapies in cancer. Molecular Cancer 22, 138 (2023). doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01827-6
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12943-023-01827-6&link_type=DOI) 

67. Fattahi, S., Khalifehzadeh-Esfahani, Z., Mohammad-Rezaei, M., Mafi, S. & Jafarinia, M. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: a potential target for anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy. Immunol Res 70, 269–275 (2022). PMC8808470. doi:10.1007/s12026-022-09268-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12026-022-09268-x&link_type=DOI) 

68. Basile, M. S., Cavalli, E., McCubrey, J., Hernández-Bello, J., Muñoz-Valle, J. F., Fagone, P. & Nicoletti, F. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: A potential pharmacological target in COVID-19. Drug Discovery Today 27, 848–856 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.11.002
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.drudis.2021.11.002&link_type=DOI) 

69. Abu-Eid, R. & Ward, F. J. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: A therapeutic strategy in COVID-19 patients. Immunology Letters 240, 1–8 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2021.09.005
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.imlet.2021.09.005&link_type=DOI) 

70. Shin, H. J., Lee, W., Ku, K. B., Yoon, G. Y., Moon, H.-W., Kim, C., Kim, M.-H., Yi, Y.-S., Jun, S., Kim, B.-T., Oh, J.-W., Siddiqui, A. & Kim, S.-J. SARS-CoV-2 aberrantly elevates mitochondrial bioenergetics to induce robust virus propagation. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 9, 125 (2024). doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01836-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-024-01836-x&link_type=DOI) 

71. Ben-Sahra, I. & Manning, B. D. mTORC1 signaling and the metabolic control of cell growth. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 45, 72–82 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.012
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.012&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28411448&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

72. Mullen, P. J., Garcia, G., Purkayastha, A., Matulionis, N., Schmid, E. W., Momcilovic, M., Sen, C., Langerman, J., Ramaiah, A., Shackelford, D. B., Damoiseaux, R., French, S. W., Plath, K., Gomperts, B. N., Arumugaswami, V. & Christofk, H. R. SARS-CoV-2 infection rewires host cell metabolism and is potentially susceptible to mTORC1 inhibition. Nature Communications 12, 1876 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22166-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-021-22166-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33767183&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

73. Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Jin, B., He, S., Dang, Y., Zhao, T. & Jin, Z. The Emerging Role of Hedgehog Signaling in Viral Infections. Front Microbiol 13, 870316 (2022). PMC9023792. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.870316
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fmicb.2022.870316&link_type=DOI) 

74. Abu-Farha, M., Thanaraj, T. A., Qaddoumi, M. G., Hashem, A., Abubaker, J. & Al-Mulla, F. The Role of Lipid Metabolism in COVID-19 Virus Infection and as a Drug Target. Int J Mol Sci 21 (2020). PMC7278986. doi:10.3390/ijms21103544
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijms21103544&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32429572&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

75. D’Avila, H., Lima, C. N. R., Rampinelli, P. G., Mateus, L. C. O., Sousa Silva, R. V. d., Correa, J. R. & Almeida, P. E. d. Lipid Metabolism Modulation during SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Spotlight on Extracellular Vesicles and Therapeutic Prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, 640 (2024).
    
    

76. Chu, J., Xing, C., Du, Y., Duan, T., Liu, S., Zhang, P., Cheng, C., Henley, J., Liu, X., Qian, C., Yin, B., Wang, H. Y. & Wang, R.-F. Pharmacological inhibition of fatty acid synthesis blocks SARS-CoV-2 replication. Nature Metabolism 3, 1466–1475 (2021). doi:10.1038/s42255-021-00479-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s42255-021-00479-4&link_type=DOI) 

77. Petrilli, C. M., Jones, S. A., Yang, J., Rajagopalan, H., O’Donnell, L., Chernyak, Y., Tobin, K. A., Cerfolio, R. J., Francois, F. & Horwitz, L. I. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. Bmj 369, m1966 (2020). PMC7243801. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1966
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE4OiIzNjkvbWF5MjJfMTUvbTE5NjYiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOC8yMS8yMDI0LjA4LjIxLjI0MzEyMDYzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

78. Tartof, S. Y., Qian, L., Hong, V., Wei, R., Nadjafi, R. F., Fischer, H., Li, Z., Shaw, S. F., Caparosa, S. L., Nau, C. L., Saxena, T., Rieg, G. K., Ackerson, B. K., Sharp, A. L., Skarbinski, J., Naik, T. K. & Murali, S. B. Obesity and Mortality Among Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: Results From an Integrated Health Care Organization. Ann Intern Med 173, 773–781 (2020). PMC7429998. doi:10.7326/m20-3742
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/m20-3742&link_type=DOI) 

79. Moriconi, D., Masi, S., Rebelos, E., Virdis, A., Manca, M. L., De Marco, S., Taddei, S. & Nannipieri, M. Obesity prolongs the hospital stay in patients affected by COVID-19, and may impact on SARS-COV-2 shedding. Obes Res Clin Pract 14, 205–209 (2020). PMC7269944. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2020.05.009
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.orcp.2020.05.009&link_type=DOI) 

80. Martínez-Colón, G. J., Ratnasiri, K., Chen, H., Jiang, S., Zanley, E., Rustagi, A., Verma, R., Chen, H., Andrews, J. R., Mertz, K. D., Tzankov, A., Azagury, D., Boyd, J., Nolan, G. P., Schürch, C. M., Matter, M. S., Blish, C. A. & McLaughlin, T. L. SARS-CoV-2 infection drives an inflammatory response in human adipose tissue through infection of adipocytes and macrophages. Science Translational Medicine 14, eabm9151 (2022). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abm9151
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1126/scitranslmed.abm9151&link_type=DOI) 

81. Johnson, C. H., Patterson, A. D., Idle, J. R. & Gonzalez, F. J. Xenobiotic metabolomics: major impact on the metabolome. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52, 37–56 (2012). PMC6300990. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134748
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134748&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21819238&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

82. Codo, A. C., Davanzo, G. G., Monteiro, L. B., de Souza, G. F., Muraro, S. P., Virgilio-da-Silva, J. V., Prodonoff, J. S., Carregari, V. C., de Biagi Junior, C. A. O., Crunfli, F., Jimenez Restrepo, J. L., Vendramini, P. H., Reis-de-Oliveira, G.,  Bispo Dos Santos,  K., Toledo-Teixeira,  D. A., Parise,  P. L., Martini,  M. C., Marques,  R. E., Carmo,  H. R., Borin,  A., Coimbra,  L. D., Boldrini,  V. O., Brunetti,  N. S., Vieira,  A. S., Mansour,  E., Ulaf,  R. G., Bernardes,  A. F., Nunes,  T. A., Ribeiro,  L. C., Palma,  A. C., Agrela,  M. V., Moretti,  M. L., Sposito,  A. C., Pereira,  F. B., Velloso,  L. A., Vinolo,  M. A. R., Damasio,  A., Proença-Módena,  J. L., Carvalho,  R. F., Mori,  M. A., Martins-de-Souza,  D., Nakaya,  H. I., Farias,  A. S. & Moraes-Vieira, P. M. Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1α/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis. Cell Metab 32, 437–446.e435 (2020). PMC7367032. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.007
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.007&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32697943&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

83. Sanchez, E. L. & Lagunoff, M. Viral activation of cellular metabolism. Virology 479-480, 609-618 (2015). PMC4424078. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.038
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.038&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25812764&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

84. Chen, P., Wu, M., He, Y., Jiang, B. & He, M.-L. Metabolic alterations upon SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential therapeutic targets against coronavirus infection. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, 237 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01510-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-023-01510-8&link_type=DOI) 

85. Kierans, S. J. & Taylor, C. T. Regulation of glycolysis by the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF): implications for cellular physiology. J Physiol 599, 23–37 (2021). doi:10.1113/jp280572
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1113/JP280572&link_type=DOI) 

86. Keramidas, P., Pitou, M., Papachristou, E. & Choli-Papadopoulou, T. Insights into the Activation of Unfolded Protein Response Mechanism during Coronavirus Infection. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, 4286–4308 (2024).
    
    

87. Barrera, M. J., Aguilera, S., Castro, I., González, S., Carvajal, P., Molina, C., Hermoso, M. A. & González, M. J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in autoimmune diseases: Can altered protein quality control and/or unfolded protein response contribute to autoimmunity? A critical review on Sjögren’s syndrome. Autoimmun Rev 17, 796–808 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2018.02.009
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.autrev.2018.02.009&link_type=DOI) 

88. Sharma, C. & Bayry, J. High risk of autoimmune diseases after COVID-19. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 19, 399–400 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41584-023-00964-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41584-023-00964-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=37046064&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

89. Sui, L., Li, L., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., Hao, P., Guo, X., Wang, W., Wang, G., Li, C. & Liu, Q. Host cell cycle checkpoint as antiviral target for SARS-CoV-2 revealed by integrative transcriptome and proteome analyses. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, 21 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01296-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41392-022-01296-1&link_type=DOI) 

90. Wisdom, R., Johnson, R. S. & Moore, C. c-Jun regulates cell cycle progression and apoptosis by distinct mechanisms. The EMBO Journal 18, 188–197 (1999). doi:10.1093/emboj/18.1.188
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZW1ib2pubCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIxOC8xLzE4OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA4LzIxLzIwMjQuMDguMjEuMjQzMTIwNjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

91. Li, H., Xiao, X., Zhang, J., Zafar, M. I., Wu, C., Long, Y., Lu, W., Pan, F., Meng, T., Zhao, K., Zhou, L., Shen, S., Liu, L., Liu, Q. & Xiong, C. Impaired spermatogenesis in COVID-19 patients. EClinicalMedicine 28, 100604 (2020). PMC7584442. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100604
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100604&link_type=DOI) 

92. Wölfel, R., Corman, V. M., Guggemos, W., Seilmaier, M., Zange, S., Müller, M. A., Niemeyer, D., Jones, T. C., Vollmar, P., Rothe, C., Hoelscher, M., Bleicker, T., Brünink, S., Schneider, J., Ehmann, R., Zwirglmaier, K., Drosten, C. & Wendtner, C. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 581, 465–469 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32235945&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

93. Sousa, R. & Lafer, E. M. The role of molecular chaperones in clathrin mediated vesicular trafficking. Front Mol Biosci 2, 26 (2015). PMC4436892. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2015.00026
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fmolb.2015.00026&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26042225&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

94. Bayati, A., Kumar, R., Francis, V. & McPherson, P. S. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells after viral entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Biol Chem 296, 100306 (2021). PMC7816624. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100306
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100306&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33476648&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

95. Lanzavecchia, A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature 314, 537–539 (1985).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/314537a0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3157869&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985AFC1700041&link_type=ISI) 

96. van den Berg, J., Haslbauer, J. D., Stalder, A. K., Romanens, A., Mertz, K. D., Studt, J.-D., Siegemund, M., Buser, A., Holbro, A. & Tzankov, A. Von Willebrand factor and the thrombophilia of severe COVID-19: in situ evidence from autopsies. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis 7, 100182 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100182
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100182&link_type=DOI) 

97. Fitzek, A., Schädler, J., Dietz, E., Ron, A., Gerling, M., Kammal, A. L., Lohner, L., Falck, C., Möbius, D., Goebels, H., Gerberding, A.-L., Schröder, A. S., Sperhake, J.-P., Klein, A., Fröb, D., Mushumba, H., Wilmes, S., Anders, S., Kniep, I., Heinrich, F., Langenwalder, F., Meißner, K., Lange, P., Zapf, A., Püschel, K., Heinemann, A., Glatzel, M., Matschke, J., Aepfelbacher, M., Lütgehetmann, M., Steurer, S., Thorns, C., Edler, C. & Ondruschka, B. Prospective postmortem evaluation of 735 consecutive SARS-CoV-2-associated death cases. Scientific Reports 11, 19342 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98499-3
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-021-98499-3&link_type=DOI) 

98. Elezkurtaj, S., Greuel, S., Ihlow, J., Michaelis, E. G., Bischoff, P., Kunze, C. A., Sinn, B. V., Gerhold, M., Hauptmann, K., Ingold-Heppner, B., Miller, F., Herbst, H., Corman, V. M., Martin, H., Radbruch, H., Heppner, F. L. & Horst, D. Causes of death and comorbidities in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Scientific Reports 11, 4263 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82862-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-021-82862-5&link_type=DOI) 

99. Kraemer, S., Vaught, J. D., Bock, C., Gold, L., Katilius, E., Keeney, T. R., Kim, N., Saccomano, N. A., Wilcox, S. K. & Zichi, D. From SOMAmer-based biomarker discovery to diagnostic and clinical applications: a SOMAmer-based, streamlined multiplex proteomic assay. PloS one 6, e26332 (2011).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0026332&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22022604&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 

100.Storey, J. D. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology*)* 64, 479–498 (2002). doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/1467-9868.00346&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177425500009&link_type=ISI) 

101.Mootha, V. K., Lindgren, C. M., Eriksson, K.-F., Subramanian, A., Sihag, S., Lehar, J., Puigserver, P., Carlsson, E., Ridderstråle, M., Laurila, E., Houstis, N., Daly, M. J., Patterson, N., Mesirov, J. P., Golub, T. R., Tamayo, P., Spiegelman, B., Lander, E. S., Hirschhorn, J. N., Altshuler, D. & Groop, L. C. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature Genetics 34, 267–273 (2003). doi:10.1038/ng1180
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng1180&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12808457&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F21%2F2024.08.21.24312063.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183815300013&link_type=ISI)

 [1]: /embed/graphic-10.gif