Abstract
Background Synergistic effects of different forms of social support (informational, tangible, emotional and belonging) on cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVRF) in aging women versus men is unknown.
Aim To quantify gender differences in the additive and multiplicative associations of four different forms of social support (informational, tangible, emotional and belonging) with cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVRF) in aging adults.
Methods Baseline data from 28,779 adults (45-85 years) in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive cohort (2012-15) with four self-reported social support measures and measured body mass index, waist circumference and blood pressure. We used stratified multivariable principal component regression (PCR) and then post-estimated calculation of adjusted means and 95% CIs.
Results Among women, reporting low availability of two types of social support was consistently associated with the highest adjusted mean levels of WC and BMI. However, lack of two types of support was less clearly or consistently associated with anthropometric measures among men. The highest adjusted mean SBP levels among women were seen for women with low availability of informational support. Among men, low-low combinations of two social supports did not consistently correspond to the highest adjusted mean SBP levels. Results for DBP were null and showed no gender differences. Sensitivity analyses revealed two significant interaction effects of tangible and belonging supports for SBP and WC among women.
Conclusion Findings showed women with two deficits in social supports had the worse CVRF profiles than one social support deficit. Women’s worse CVRF profiles were seen for deficit combinations that included low informational support. We did not, however, find antagonistic/synergistic effects of social support on CVRFs. Heart health care and prevention for aging women would benefit from ensuring informational support with other supports is available.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board (H19-00971).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Due to privacy and confidentiality requirements data can only be made available for researchers who meet the criteria for access. See Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) https://www.clsa-elcv.ca/data-access for details
