Abstract
Background Suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a major challenge in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) treatment interventions among persons who use alcohol and other substances (AOS) in fisherfolk communities. While studies have identified barriers to ART adherence and interventions to address these barriers in this population, no systematic review has been conducted to establish the significance of these interventions.
Methods Searches were conducted in three electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO for studies conducted in English between 1996 and April 2024 to identify relevant primary studies that included adult males or females, engages in fishing activities, use alcohol or other substances and are HIV positive. Outcomes include any measure of adherence to ART, a reduction or abstinence from alcohol and other substance use and associated consequences that could hinder ART adherence.
Results 54 studies were identified and screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Five papers met the inclusion criteria (three quantitative designs, one qualitative design and one mixed methods design). Seven interventions were identified, these include counselling, peer support, screening and brief intervention, economic straightening, social network, gender transformative programmes and prescription monitoring.
Conclusion Findings highlight the significance of alcohol use reduction interventions and gender transformative programmes particularly among men to encourage ART adherence in fisherfolk communities. To achieve the universal target of an end to the HIV scourge by 2030, specific hard to reach populations like fisherfolk communities with high HIV prevalence, alcohol and other substance use needs particular attention.
1. Introduction
Suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) by people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) has remained a major barrier to effective HIV control particularly among persons who use alcohol and other substances (AOS) in fisherfolk communities (Kapesa et al., 2018; Sileo et al., 2019a; Tumwesigye et al., 2012). ART has been a global treatment for HIV with many lives saved (Parashar et al., 2016; Walter and Petry, 2016; Weber et al., 2013). However, positive outcomes depend on optimal ART adherence (O’Halloran Leach et al., 2021). Meeting optimal ART adherence has been a major challenge in HIV control (Fuge et al., 2022; Mohd Salleh et al., 2018; O’Halloran Leach et al., 2021). Moreover, achievements tend not to be uniform across nations, populations and settings (Parashar et al., 2016). For example, a systematic review reported that up to 75% of PLHIV on ART in the general population complied with treatment regimen (Detsis et al., 2017) with up to 92% viral load suppression (UNAIDS, 2022). However, in fishing communities, adherence is estimated below 70% (Sileo et al., 2019b) with less than 40% viral load suppression among persons who use AOS (Deryabina and El-Sadr, 2019). Similarly, while life expectancy among PLHIV is gradually levelling up with the general population, this is not the case among persons who use AOS (Marcus et al., 2016; McManus et al., 2012; Petoumenos and Law, 2016). In some countries, significant numbers of people, often the most marginalized (e.g., fishing communities) are being neglected (El-Bassel et al., 2014; Musumari et al., 2021; West et al., 2014). Therefore, the gains of ART have not fully extended to all populations, particularly persons who use AOS, in different work settings and communities including fisherfolk communities.
It appears to date no systematic review on interventions to address non-adherence to ART among fisherfolk communities with substance use issues has been conducted. Thus, the need for a systematic review exploring interventions to encourage ART adherence for HIV treatment among persons who use AOS in fisherfolk communities and to assess the effectiveness of the interventions.
1.1. Fisherfolk Communities
Fisherfolk communities are riverine or coastal communities that engage in fishing activities as an occupation and as means of livelihood. Fishing communities have been associated with high prevalence of AOS use and HIV risky behaviours (Choo et al., 2015; Fort et al., 2012; Tiberio et al., 2018). Alcohol consumption cuts across both male and females particularly among people living with HIV (Bonnevie et al., 2020; Kissling et al., 2005; Tumwesigye et al., 2012). Studies put HIV risks and prevalence among fishing communities at between three and 10 times greater than the general population (Kapesa et al., 2018; Michalopoulos et al., 2016; Tumwesigye et al., 2012; West et al., 2014).
1.2. Risk factors for AOS use and HIV infection in fisherfolk communities
Some risk factors linked with AOS use among the fishing population includes youth population, occupational culture and hazards, male dominant profession, family dysfunction, geographical area, stress, migratory and social isolation (Allison and Mvula, 2002; Fort et al., 2012; Kuteesa et al., 2020; Sileo et al., 2019a). Fishing has been described as a dangerous occupation which directly or indirectly impacts the health and well-being of fishermen (Percin et al., 2012). In the United States, commercial fishing is reported as one of the most hazardous occupations with a fatality rate estimated at over 40 times more than the national average in 2019 (Centre for Disease Control [CDC], 2023).
A qualitative study reported marginalization of fisherfolk communities in the larger society, common HIV risk behaviours such as unsafe drug injection practices, unprotected sex and acceptable drug use behaviours within the fishing communities as part of occupational social networks (West et al., 2014). Sustaining a thriving fishing business is associated with high risks including extra labour and stress. One study reported at certain times when profits are high and the lake is stormy, berthing sites experience higher levels of alcohol consumption, sex trading, substance use, and child labour (Wandera et al., 2021). Another study identified peer influence in addition to alcohol consumption as major factors associated with risky sexual behaviour among fisherfolk (Ford and Chamratrithirong, 2008).
1.3. Barriers to ART adherence
1.3.1. AOS use
AOS use have been identified as barriers to engagement in HIV treatment and adherence to ART in fishing communities (El-Bassel et al., 2014; Sileo et al., 2019a; 2019b). A systematic review with meta-analysis reported that people who use alcohol were approximately 60% less likely to adhere to ART prescriptions compared to those who don’t use alcohol or use less (Hendershot et al., 2009). Similarly, UNAIDS reports that people who inject drugs (PWID) constitute 70% of HIV infections globally with new infections of up to 35 times more than adults who do not inject drugs (UNAIDS, 2022). Studies show close to half of those who use drugs amongst fisherfolk have a history of injecting drugs during fishing trips, longer stay at sea and engaged in unsafe injection practices in the past 30 days (Choo et al., 2015). The prevalence of HIV alone among PWID is estimated at between 18% and 25% (Deryabina and El-Sadr, 2019). The risk of HIV spread among PWID is directly through blood exchange from sharing needles and risky sexual behaviours under the influence of drugs (CDC, 2018; Plankey et al., 2007; Thiede et al., 2009). Active injecting drug use has been linked with non-adherent ART (Joseph et al., 2015). And fishing communities have been particularly associated with unsafe drug injection practices (Choo et al., 2015; West et al., 2014). Studies have reported persons who use AOS, particularly PWID are stigmatized, denigrated, marginalized and blamed for their HIV positive status, thereby constituting hindrance to ART adherence (Strathdee et al., 2012). Besides PWID, stigmatization is one of the socio–structural barriers to ART adherence in fisherfolk communities (Sileo et al., 2019b).
Despite the risk of HIV infection among persons who use AOS and as barriers to ART adherence in fishing communities, the prevention of AOS use among PLHIV has remained challenging (Kuteesa et al., 2022; Naigino et al., 2023; Petoumenos and Law, 2016; Womack and Justice, 2020). Increased intoxication has been reported from drug use and mortality risk compared to persons with negative HIV status (Justice et al., 2016). In particular, the control of HIV among PWID will remain challenging if the fundamental issues driving HIV transmission and promote lack of adherence to ART are not addressed in this community.
1.3.2. Structural and social conditions
Recent studies identified structural peculiarities and social conditions including physical environment, occupational mobility, low quality of care and administrative protocol, poor linkage to care centres and lack of social support as contributing factors to non-optimal adherence to ART in fishing communities (Bogart et al., 2016; Ombere and Nyambedha, 2023; Rosen et al., 2020; Sileo, et al., 2019b). Better understanding of these structural and social factors and associated impacts will help to align policies and protocol for optimal utilization of ART in fishing communities. Other barriers include lack of integrated care that addresses substance use, HIV, other medical and co-occurring mental health conditions, psychosocial concerns and patients’ perspective of efficacy (Amin and Douaihy, 2018; Roberts, 2000).
1.4. Interventions to improve ART Adherence
The World Health Organisation (WHO) categorized the different adherence improvement interventions into five dimensions: health system/health care team related, social and economic related, patient related, therapy and condition related (WHO, 2003). Subsequently, studies have identified different interventions to encourage adherence to ART across these dimensions in different populations, settings, and subgroups.
Some of these interventions for ART adherence have been evaluated among persons who use AOS. For example, in a systematic review, DOT was found to be effective in encouraging adherence to ART and recommended in the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (IAPAC) guideline (Ford et al., 2009; Mannheimer and Hirsch-Moverman, 2015). Once-a-day single tablet regimen or fewer pills was also found to promote optimal adherence among persons who use AOS (Mohd Salleh et al., 2018; Samet et al., 2005) and harm reduction among persons who use illicit opioids (Lappalainen et al., 2015).
Studies have also reported no significant positive outcomes in promoting adherence to ART with some interventions. For example, peer led, support and mentoring (Collier et al., 2005; Purcell et al., 2007; Simoni et al., 2007). Other interventions that have been found not to show significant improvement in ART adherence in different studies include education alone (Rawlings et al., 2003; Tuldrà et al., 2000), couples related interventions (Remien et al., 2005), interventions focused on treatment of depression alone (Pyne et al., 2011), CBT for adherence and depression (CBT-AD) (Simoni et al., 2013), telephone counselling (Abrahams et al., 2010), single tablet regimen (Dejesus et al., 2009; Parienti et., 2007) and mindfulness based stress management (Duncan et al,, 2012).
Studies addressing ART adherence seem to be inconsistent in findings depending on the target population and settings. However, studies report that combination and multifaceted interventions tailored towards individual’s needs and the at-risk populations seem most promising (Attonito et al., 2020; Mannheimer and Hirsch-Moverman, 2015; Mills et al., 2014). Socio-economic, environmental and cultural risk factors for substance use and HIV transmission in fishing communities are multiple and cross-cutting. Available studies have established high prevalence of AOS use and HIV in fishing communities, associated barriers to ART adherence and interventions to encourage ART adherence among those who use AOS. Despite these findings, there seems to be limited data on interventions to encourage adherence to ART in fishing communities and how barriers have been effectively addressed. Moreover, no systematic review has been conducted to establish these.
As ART expansion continues with recorded achievements in the control of the global HIV epidemic, barriers to adherence among persons who use AOS in fisherfolk communities need to be addressed so as not to undermine the progress made so far. This is particularly important in achieving the goal of an end to the HIV/AIDS scourge by 2030 (UNAIDS, 2014). Therefore, more studies are required to identify interventions that have been used to address these barriers to encourage adherence, whether they were effective in this population without assuming that ‘one-size-fits all’ or that similar interventions in other populations are sufficient. It is hoped that this review will help to identify different interventions to encourage ART adherence for HIV treatment among persons who use AOS in fisherfolk communities and to assess the effectiveness of the interventions. This will guide recommendations and suggestions for further studies.
Methodology
Research Design
This is a systematic review of primary studies on interventions to encourage ART among people living with HIV who use AOS in fisherfolk communities, identify the interventions and establish how effective are the interventions. The review is registered with PROSPERO, the prospective register for systematic review, (Registration: CRD42023429458). The outcomes of primary and secondary importance respectively are ART adherence interventions and interventions to encourage ART adherence in the population.
Data Sources
An overview of related literature and topic as identified in journal articles contributed to the framing of the query. Searches were conducted across three electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. The following search terms with Boolean operators were used: (“substance related disorders” OR “drug misuse”) AND (“fisheries” OR “fisherfolk communit*”
OR “fishing communit*” OR “fishing zone” OR “fishing village” OR “fish farm” OR “fishing area” OR “fisherfolk” OR “fishermen” OR “fisherwomen”) AND (“behavior therapy” OR “psychosocial intervention” OR “treatment” OR “therapeutics” OR “patient care” OR “encourage” OR “adherence” OR “promote” OR “treatment adherence and compliance” OR “medication adherence” OR “anti retroviral therapy” OR “hiv infections” OR “acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” OR “antiretroviral therapy, highly active” OR “prevent hiv transmission” OR “health education” OR “health promotion” OR “harm reduction”).
In addition, manual hand-searching of the reference list of included studies in the review was undertaken for relevant articles not identified through the database searches and key authors were contacted via email to determine whether there were relevant forthcoming papers that had not appeared in the searches. This is to ensure that no relevant articles were excluded.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Study selection
MOA independently extracted articles from the search outcomes after duplicates were removed. MOA, PR and LK independently screened the titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine full texts to be reviewed for eligibility. Where there was eligibility disagreement, AG, ML and AW resolved the disagreements. MOA, PR and LK further assessed the included studies for eligibility by reading through the full text. Discrepancies were resolved by AG, ML and AW. The review process is shown in PRISMA flow diagram as Fig. 1.
Data extraction
The search outputs were imported into EndNote 2021 computer software for reference management and removal of duplicate references. A mixed methods data extraction form separated into qualitative and quantitative designs was used. MOA independently extracted descriptive and analytical data from the included studies (table 4). Extracted data includes author(s) and year of publication, title, country, age of respondents, gender, sample size, drugs involved, specific interventions, population target for intervention, type of design, outcome measure, index of adherence and study limitations. An agreement of data extraction was obtained from the authors. MOA then went through all the citations and extracted relevant data for accuracy. Where there were uncertainties, PR and LK were consulted. Once consensus was reached on the qualified studies, MOA entered relevant data into an excel data extraction form.
Critical appraisal
The quality of studies was independently assessed by MOA and PR using methodological quality criteria outlined for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies as provided in the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool Version 2018 (Hong et al., 2018). Each of these were assessed across five domains. For example, the qualitative studies were assessed by the following dimensions: a) if the qualitative approach were appropriate in answering the research question, b) adequacy of the qualitative data collection methods to address the research question, c) if findings were adequately derived from the data, d) if interpretation of results were sufficiently substantiated by the data and e) if there were coherence between data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation. Similarly, quantitative studies were assessed on whether they were randomized control trials (RCT’s), non-randomized or descriptive studies. There were no randomized and non-randomized trials in the included studies, thus criteria for RCT’s were not utilized in this review. However, descriptive quantitative studies were assessed: a) if the sampling strategy were relevant to answering the research question, b) sample representativeness of the target population, c) appropriateness of measurements, d) level of risk of bias, and e) if statistical analysis were appropriate for the research question. Lastly, the mixed method studies were assessed for: a) rationale for using mixed method design, b) adequacy in the integration of the different components of the study to answer the research question, c) interpretation of outputs of all integrated components, d) resolution of divergence and inconsistences between the components and e) adherence to the quality criteria of each of the components. The final scores for the assessment were agreed through discussions between the primary investigator and the reviewers.
Analysis
Qualitative analysis was undertaken by grouping key findings into main themes according to ART adherence intervention measures and encouraging adherence as relevant to the study by addressing barriers. First was the coding and categorization of first and second order empirical constructs while paying particular attention to the strengths and challenges of remote data collection practices and implications. This was followed by coding and categorization of study design (methodology, theoretical application, and synthesis), outcomes/findings and study limitations. All codes were presented in a MS excel table with their pertaining data and sorted into similarity to their potential themes. The themes used in this study were health system/health care team related, social and economic related, therapy related, patient related, condition related (WHO, 2003). Pooled prevalence and heterogeneity were not calculated due to the limited quantitative designs and similarity.
Results
A total of 54 studies were found after running through the search strategy in the three databases (PubMed = 23, Web of Science = 11, PsycINFO = 6), citation searching (14) and follow up with authors (0). Eleven duplicate articles were removed. The process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines as reported in Fig. 1.
Out of the remaining 43 articles only 22 full-text studies met the criteria for screening and five papers from two studies were retained for inclusion in the analysis: quantitative studies (n = 3) (Kiene et al., 2019a; Sileo et al., 2019b; Sileo et al., 2021), qualitative studies (n = 1) (Sileo et al., 2019a), and mixed study (n = 1) (Sileo et al., 2019c). Other studies were excluded because of age (n = 5) (Bonnevie et al., 2020; Burgos-Soto et al., 2020; Kuteesa et al., 2022; Lubega et al., 2015; Mgabo et al., 2013), no alcohol or other substance use (n = 6)(Burke et al., 2017; Chang et al., 2016; Kagaayi et al., 2019; Long et al., 2017; Rosen et al., 2020; Sileo et al., 2019d), no ART interventions or to encourage adherence (n = 5)(Brown et al., 2017; Kiene et al., 2019b; Kissling et al., 2005; Ousley et al., 2018; Brown and George, 2019), and studies not in fisherfolk communities (n = 1)(Hickey et al., 2015) (see appendix 3).
Four out of the five papers in this review were from the same study (Sileo et al., 2019a; Sileo et al., 2019b; Sileo et al., 2019c; Sileo et al., 2021). In addition, the second study was conducted in the same country, Uganda (Kiene et al., 2019a). Though sample size for each of the four papers from one of the studies vary, the sample for the study was 300 males while the second study sampled 132 males and 168 females. Of the five papers, two (Sileo et al., 2019b; Kiene et al., 2019a) used structured questionnaires to collect data, one used structured interview, another one used in-depth semi-structured interview and one used both structured questionnaires and in-depth interview.
Quality assessment
Results of the quality assessment are shown in Table 3. For each of the domains, the scores were reported in either “yes” or “no” and a percentage of number of “yeses” was used to report the final score in line with the Mixed method appraisal tool (Hong et al., 2018). All papers presented clear research questions, collected relevant data to address the questions, interpreted the results sufficiently from the data and adequately reported findings from the data. Rationales were provided for the use of both samples and designs. No ethical issues were identified in the papers. In summary, all the five papers had a score of 100% each demonstrating the high quality of the included papers.
Interventions
A total of seven interventions were identified from the review and are presented in six themes.
Counselling
Two papers identified counselling (Sileo et al., 2019a; Sileo et al., 2019b). Findings show that counselling on ART adherence and alcohol use helps to reduce the level of alcohol consumption with an increase in the proportion of prescription doses taken in the prior four days (Sileo et al., 2019a; Sileo et al., 2019b). The counselling services include providing information about AOS use and consequences, HIV transmission and consequences, knowledge about ART and benefits, sexuality education, allaying HIV associated fears and anxiety, discarding myths and misconceptions (Sileo et al., 2019a; Sileo et al., 2019b).
While earlier studies have identified counselling as effective intervention in promoting ART adherence (Kalichman et al., 2011; Mbuagbaw et al., 2015; Mills et al., 2014; Pradier et al., 2003), there have been some inconsistencies in findings (Hlophe et al., 2023; Reif et al., 2020).
The inconsistent findings may not be unconnected with the counselling strategies whether one on one, group or telephone, alone or in combination with other interventions which have been reported as important in making a difference. For example, Abrahams and colleagues noted that among the different counselling strategies, telephone counselling alone did not demonstrate significant positive outcomes in improving ART adherence (Abrahams et al., 2010) suggesting the need for a combination of interventions (Attonito et al., 2020; Brown and Adeagbo, 2022; Hlophe et al., 2023).
Gender transformative programmes
One of the papers highlighted the impacts of gender transformative strategies in improving ART adherence through improved patient retention (Sileo et al 2021). Gender transformative programmes work to challenge detrimental male gender norms and advance gender equality as a strategy to improve men and women’s health behaviours and outcomes (Sileo et al., 2021). Sileo and colleagues reported that gender transformative programmes restored masculine role of being seen as hard working, a provider to the family, husband, and sexual partner, possessing physical strength which were initially seen as being compromised by HIV positive diagnosis (Sileo et al., 2021). Studies have reported the influence of masculine norms and social expectations of gender roles in health behaviours (Baker et al., 2014; Fleming and Dworkin, 2016; WHO, 2007) and in HIV infection and management (Gottert, 2014; Shannon et al., 2012; Sileo, et al., 2019e) particularly in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). Reports in SSA have consistently maintained that men have worse ART treatment adherence compared to women and with greater mortality (Beckham et al., 2016; Cornell et al., 2011; Shand et al., 2014; Sileo et al., 2019e). For example, HIV diagnosis is viewed as a threat to men’s ego, social valued relationships, and their desires to be seen as strong, self-reliant, sexually successful and worthy of respect (Chikovore et al., 2016; Naugle et al., 2019; Okoror et al., 2016). Previous studies classified these roles under ‘reputation-based’ and ‘respectability-based’ masculine ideologies (Barker and Ricardo, 2005; Sikweyiya et al., 2014; Siu et al., 2013; Siu et al., 2014). Reputation-based gender roles relate to strength and sexual competence of men while respectability-based gender roles relate to being fatherly and provider for the family (Sileo et al., 2019c). Therefore, HIV stigma due to these norms may have significant effects on HIV care engagement and ART adherence for men who are adherent of the traditional masculine norms and are more likely to experience adverse impacts of stigma on their male self-worth, reputation and performance of their masculine ideals. Men with high level of internalized stigma have been reported to have increased likelihood of poor treatment adherence (Sileo et al., 2021). The fear of losing these identities and roles as well as the psychological impacts of being identified as HIV positive and seeking treatment, support the utilization and significance gender transformative programme. Earlier studies have reported that men who experienced ART healing effects on their health, strength, masculine identities, and role accomplishment adapted better to their HIV status and care engagement (Sileo et al., 2019c; Siu et al., 2014; Siu et al., 2012; Tsondai et al., 2017). However, for those who may experience some side effects such as dizziness and fatigue, the gender role of strength, hard work and provider becomes a barrier to ART adherence (Hlophe et al., 2023; Sileo et al., 2019c).
This finding has implications for the use of gender transformative interventions that includes stigma reduction strategies to address gender-based barriers to HIV treatment interventions among men. Previous studies have suggested the use of multi-level strategies that include individual level, structural and stigma reduction interventions. For example, Figueroa and colleagues used community dialogues to change community, gender and sexual norms in HIV prevention in Mozambique while expanding social support against HIV stigma (Figueroa et al., 2016) and have proved to be effective in reducing internalized stigma associated with HIV diagnosis and encourage adherence to ART (Pantelic et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2020). Other gender transformative and structural-level interventions among PLHIV includes targeting HIV economic risk factors, such as cash transfer or microfinance programmes to reduce vulnerabilities to HIV infections and improve economic independence (Kilburn et al., 2018). A good understanding of the interacting and independent effects of endorsing inequitable gender norms and HIV stigma on HIV treatment interventions in this population could inform the advancement of gender specific HIV services to engage and retain fisherfolk and men in other key and hard to reach populations in HIV care.
Economic strengthening
One study reported the impact of commitment savings, as a component of economic strengthening, in reducing alcohol consumption and sexual HIV risky behaviours (Kiene et al., 2019a). Commitment savings was associated with lower odds of problematic alcohol use (Kiene et al., 2019a). Three reasons why commitment savings was effective in reducing sexual risk behaviour and alcohol use were identified. These includes, i) deterrent to impulsive purchase of alcohol and patronizing sex workers due to limited cash, ii) the small cost to accessing money which increases salience and iii) value of longer-term goals associated with savings and the overall benefits of achieving longer term life objectives (Kiene et al., 2019a).
The use of economic strengthening through commitment savings is an emerging intervention to encourage HIV care. Commitment savings involves promoting money saving, for example in a bank, cooperative or via mobile money with “soft commitment” by restricting access to money or charges fees for withdrawals (Kiene, et al., 2019a). Generally, economic strengthening interventions are aimed at improving the economic wellbeing of people through one or more of the following: financial literacy trainings, income generation, conditional cash transfers, micro savings and lending (Kiene et al., 2019a) and have been found to demonstrate positive effects on health outcomes (Ssewamala et al., 2012), reducing sexual risk behaviours (Witte et al., 2015) and improving ART adherence, treatment retention and quality of life measure in SSA (Bateganya et al., 2015). Commitment savings help to reduce impulse buying for people with issues of self-control and unnecessary cash withdrawals (Dupas and Robinson, 2013; Ky et al., 2016).
Prior studies have reported that people who use alcohol, particularly before sex are more likely to engage in an unprotected sex and get infected with HIV when compared with those who do not use alcohol or use at a lesser rate (Kiene et al., 2008; Woolf-King et al., 2011). And fishing communities operate on a cash-based economy where fisherfolk get paid daily in cash with limited mechanisms for savings (Sileo et al., 2016) thereby encouraging risky sexual behaviour and alcohol consumption (Keyes et al., 2011; Kuteesa et al., 2022; MacPherson et al., 2012).
While different forms of economic based strengthening interventions such as contingency management (Mbuagbaw et al., 2015) have been used to prevent high risk behaviours and encourage ART adherence, this use of commitment savings led economic strengthening seems to be novel. This seems to support the report of Mbuagbaw and colleagues who noted that ‘the role of theoretical underpinnings in adherence research for HIV is unclear’ (Mbuagbaw et al., 2015, 262). Therefore, adherence behaviour may go beyond the scope of any single theory. Innovative approaches in hard-to-reach populations are suggested. Moreover, complex interventions have not been shown to be more effective than simple ones (Chaiyachati et al., 2014).
Strong desires to save money for children and the future have been identified among PLHIV in previous studies (Sileo et al., 2016). However, a recent systematic review conducted in low and middle-income countries found that economic support was not statistically associated with ART adherence (Reif et al., 2020). Overall, this finding suggests that promoting money saving mechanisms which involves a commitment among fisherfolk may be particularly helpful for those who have problem with alcohol use in controlling the level of alcohol consumption and engagement in risky sexual behaviours. A randomized trial would be appropriate to determine if commitment saving behaviour in this population produces a reduction in AOS use that may encourage ART adherence.
Social network and peer support
A paper reported that social network and peer support increased ART adherence (Sileo et al., 2019c). Men were found to rely greatly on a network of male peers for instrumental and emotional support utilizing the unique working environment where men gather for work in a community setting.
One of the significant findings in this review is that men were found to rely greatly on a network of male peers for instrumental and emotional support thus utilizing the unique working environment where men gather for work in a community setting. People who engage in fishing activities are highly mobile, spend greater amount of time away from homes, mostly with peers and co-workers, and form community social networks. Previous studies have found community social networks (Enane et al., 2021; Mendelsohn et al., 2012; Mannheimer and Hirsch-Moverman, 2015), treatment and social supporters (Mills et al., 2014; Shushtari et al., 2023; van Wyk, 2021) and male peer-led groups (Baron et al., 2020; Bogart et al., 2020; Carbone et al., 2019, Holstad et al., 2012) as effective in encouraging ART adherence. Knowing other men on ART normalise HIV and reduce the fear of HIV associated stigma and discrimination, gives hope of longer life like colleague who may have lived with HIV for many years and still productive (Hlophe et al., 2023; Tsondai et al., 2017).
Prescription monitoring
In a cross-sectional study, Sileo and colleagues found that prescription monitoring enhances ART adherence with less proportion of missed ART in the prior four days (Sileo et al., 2019b). The Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group (AACTG) scale was used to measure and monitor self-reported prescription adherence (Chesney et al., 2000). The use of directly observed therapy and monitoring have been recommended for persons who use AOS in previous studies (Mbuagbaw et al., 2015; Ford et al., 2009; Mannheimer and Hirsch-Moverman, 2015). While prescription monitoring enhances ART adherence it did not address alcohol use barrier to ART adherence (Sileo et al., 2019b).
Screening and brief intervention
Screening and brief intervention (SBI) helps to reduce alcohol consumption to enhance ART adherence and improve ART adherence (Sileo et al., 2019b). Respondents were found to be paying more attention to health needs, respect for health care providers and ART adherence. The successful implementation of SBI in reducing alcohol use is consistent with previous studies (Kaner et al., 2007). SBI involves universal screening for alcohol use, providing information, increasing motivation and teaching of behavioural change skills to reduce the level of alcohol use (Babor et al., 2007). Reductions in the level of alcohol consumption, paying attention to health needs and respect for health care providers suggests that SBI by care providers is acceptable to patients who use alcohol and are on ART (Sileo et al., 2019b). The inclusion of how these can help men to achieve their goals and fulfil masculine responsibilities including providing for families may increase the motivation for alcohol use reduction and cessation. However, Sileo and colleagues reported that there was no significant difference between those who had no record of drinking in past four days and those who engaged in low-risk drinking (Sileo et al., 2019b).
Thus, suggesting that higher consumption of alcohol may be driving suboptimal adherence.
Moreover, earlier studies demonstrated limited evidence in support of motivational interview based brief interventions to address alcohol use and HIV treatment engagement (Grimsrud et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2017; Sileo et al., 2020). Further research is needed to test the effectiveness of SBI for fisherfolk who use AOS in a quantitative and randomized control trail. This will help to understand the needed best structure, delivery and environmental intervention in this unique population context.
The effects of the different interventions are summarized in table 4.
Discussion
This is a systematic review on antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions among persons who use AOS in fisherfolk communities. Despite the high prevalence of AOS use in fisherfolk communities and associated barriers to ART adherence, no systematic review has been undertaken in this population to identify and assess the quality of interventions that addresses these barriers and encourage ART adherence. To our knowledge, this is the first review to fill this gap in literature. Interventions aimed at mitigating HIV infections and transmission among persons who use AOS in fisherfolk communities with the possibilities of providing in depth understanding of how peculiarities in this population are being addressed. The review identified five papers from two studies which were included in the analysis thus expanding prior reviews on ART adherence in key and hard to reach populations (Strathdee et al., 2012, Sileo et al., 2019b). Findings from this review highlight several issues on the current state of evidence in this key population. First, there is a paucity of studies in this population in many countries, particularly outside Africa despite the high burden of HIV and alcohol consumption. Second, these interventions have not been tested beyond self-report by the participants and descriptive analysis. However key interventions have been identified, these include counselling, peer support, SBI, economic straightening, social network, gender transformative programmes and prescription monitoring.
Overall, calls have been made on the need to accommodate structural barriers against key and hard to reach populations with the development of models of care that are tailored to specific needs (Macdonald et al., 2017; Sileo et al., 2019c), policies and institution level change that addresses gender inequalities in HIV treatment interventions (Dovel et al., 2015; Fleming and Dworkin, 2016). However, occupational and structural factors specific to fisherfolk communities and risk factors for alcohol use remained as barriers to ART adherence irrespective of motivations for the interventions and seems not to have been adequately addressed in this review. Such risk factors include dealing with cold, wind, long fishing hours, ability to sleep well during off hours and as a motivation to initiate conversation with the opposite sex (Sileo et al., 2019a).
Strengths and limitations
It is difficult to generalize the findings beyond alcohol consumption. Only 6% of the sample reported using other substances besides alcohol. Only qualitative, and descriptive quantitative studies were found to have met the inclusion criteria. No quantitative randomized or non-randomized control trails have been conducted to investigate any of these interventions in this population. Only studies conducted in English were included, this may have excluded some studies with substantial evidence that were conducted in other languages. Even though the review was not restricted to any country, the included studies were conducted in communities in one country, Uganda in Africa, therefore limits generalization of findings to other countries. In addition, the participants were mainly males (72%) thus limiting generalization of findings to both genders. Another limitation is that none of the studies established whether improved adherence led to better clinical outcomes. One of the previous studies reported that interventions to encourage ART adherence and improved adherence to ART did not translate to improved clinical outcomes (Mbuagbaw et al., 2015). Despite these, this is the first attempt to conduct a systematic review on this key population. The review was a mixed method systematic review that allows for a more comprehensive analysis of ART adherence even with the very limited data. The study therefore provides valuable insight into interventions that have encouraged ART adherence in this key and hard to reach population. Of particular significance is the identification and impacts of new interventions such as the gender transformative programmes and commitment savings.
Conclusion
Fishing communities are some of the hidden and most-at-risk populations for HIV, AOS use. The physical, structural, cultural and social environment makes interventions to reduce AOS use and encourage ART adherence in this population challenging. Notwithstanding, in this review, a number of interventions were identified. Findings highlight the need for alcohol use reduction interventions for fisherfolk on ART to improve adherence particularly among men. Also added support to the use of gender transformative interventions in altering inequitable gender norms.
The findings highlight some important knowledge gaps that need to be addressed with this population. That the interventions were deduced from non-randomized designs, there is a need for further research aimed at examining the influence of these interventions on ART outcomes in this population and in more countries, develop and test the effectiveness of the interventions in quantitative studies and randomized controlled trails. Considering the universal target of 95%-95%-95% by 2025 and an end to HIV/AIDS scourge by 2030 (UNAIDS, 2014), there is the need to focus attention on key and hard to reach populations with high HIV prevalence and significant barriers to care.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
References
