Summary
Despite rapid advancements in clinical sequencing, over half of diagnostic evaluations still lack definitive results. RNA-seq has shown promise in research settings for bridging this gap by providing essential functional data for accurate interpretation of diagnostic sequencing results. However, despite advanced research pipelines, clinical translation of diagnostic RNA-seq has not yet been realized. We have developed and validated a clinical diagnostic RNA-seq test in a CLIA laboratory for individuals with suspected genetic disorders who have existing or concurrent comprehensive DNA diagnostic testing. This diagnostic RNA-seq test processes patient RNA samples from fibroblasts or blood and derives clinical interpretations based on the analytical detection of outliers in gene expressions and splicing patterns. The clinical validation involves 150 samples, including benchmark, negative, and positive samples. We developed provisional expression and splicing benchmarks using short-read and long-read RNA-seq data from the HG002 lymphoblastoid sample produced by the Genome in a Bottle Consortium. Our validation data achieved analytical sensitivity and specificity higher than 99% against the benchmarks. For clinical validation, we first established reference ranges for each gene and junction based on expression distributions from our control data. We then evaluated the clinical performance of our outlier-based pipeline using positive samples with previously identified diagnostic findings from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network project. Our pipeline identified 19 of 20 positive findings in both fibroblast and blood samples and highlighted the limitations of the test. Our study provides a paradigm and necessary resources for independent laboratories to validate a clinical RNA-seq test.
Competing Interest Statement
Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) and Miraca Holdings Inc. have formed a joint venture with shared ownership and governance of Baylor Genetics (BG), which performs genetic testing and derives revenue. PL and CME are employees of BCM and derives support through a professional services agreement with BG.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by National Institutes of Health Common Fund (U01HG007709 and U01HG007942) and the grant from National Human Genome Research Institute (R35HG011311).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Baylor College of Medicine (H-42680). The study subjects were originally recruited through informed consent approved the IRB at the National Human Genome Research Institute (15HG0130) or BCM (H-34433 and H-44172), and then de-identified for the current study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos