Abstract
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations routinely include contrast-agent based dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) acquisitions. Expanding the accessibility and personalization of breast MRI might be supported amongst others by advancing non-contrast-enhanced MRI, such as virtual dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques (vDCE) utilizing neural networks. This IRB-approved retrospective study includes n=540 breast MRI examinations acquired on a single 3T MRI scanner. Two 2D U-Net architectures were trained using non-contrast-enhanced MRI acquisitions including T1w, T2w and multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging acquisitions as inputs and either a single (SCO-Net) or multiple (MCO-Net) time points of a DCE series as ground truth. The neural networks predicted a vDCE series corresponding to five consecutive DCE time points. Across all time points, no significant differences in structural similarity index (SSIM) could be found between the SCO-Net and MCO-Net, both achieving a mean SSIM of 0.86. For peak-signal-to-noise-ratio and normalized root-mean-square error, significantly better results could be observed for the MCO-Net reaching scores of 24.42dB and 0.087 respectively. Comparison of manual segmentations of findings on DCE and vDCE images reached a DICE score of 0.61 and an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.47 without significant differences between SCO-Net and MCO-Net. These findings suggest a technical feasibility of generating vDCE image series from unenhanced input acquisitions using neural networks. However, the analysis does not allow drawing any conclusion on the clinical assessment of lesion specific curve kinetics, which need to be assessed prior determining on the feasibility of deriving diagnostically meaningful enhancement characteristics in individual lesions.
Competing Interest Statement
Authors H.S., A.L., S.B. have pending patent EPO No. 21197259.1 on topic of this manuscript.
Funding Statement
This project is funded by the Bavarian State Ministery of Science and Arts in the framework of the bidt Graduate Center for Postdocs.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Friedrich-Alexander University gave approval for this work, waving the requirement for informed consent
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used and produced in the present study are not publicly available due to preservation of personal privacy under the european GDPR. Institution handling this data is the Radiological Department of University Hospital Erlangen.
