ABSTRACT
Background Recent disproportionality analyses and nationwide case-control studies suggested a potential association between clozapine use and hematological malignancy (HM). Nevertheless, the absolute rate difference is unclear due to the absence of cohort studies.
Methods We extracted data from a territory-wide public healthcare database in Hong Kong to build a retrospective cohort of anonymized patients aged 18+ with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who used clozapine or olanzapine (drug comparator with highly similar chemical structure and pharmacological mechanisms) for 90+ days, with at least two prior other antipsychotic use records within both groups. Weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity scores, Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of HM between clozapine and olanzapine users. The absolute rate difference was also estimated.
Results In total, 9,965 patients were included, with 834 clozapine users, who had a significant IRR of 2.22 (95% CI 1.52, 3.34) for HM compared to olanzapine users. Absolute rate difference was estimated to be 57.40 (95% CI 33.24, 81.55) per 100,000 person-years. Findings were consistent across sub-groups by age and sex in terms of effect size, although the IRR was non-significant for those aged 65 or older. Sensitivity analyses all supported the robustness of the results and showed good specificity to HM but no other cancers.
Conclusion Absolute rate difference in HM incidence was very small although there is a twofold elevated rate. Pharmacotherapies with clozapine may consider this potential rare risk in addition to known side effects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/ Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (HKU/HA HKW IRB, reference number: UW 20-113).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵✠ Joint senior authors
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from Hong Kong Hospital Authority's Central Panel on Administrative Assessment of External Data Requests (https://www3.ha.org.hk/data/Provision/Submission).
