Abstract
Children in low-resource settings often consume microbially contaminated food, posing a risk to their health. We evaluated the impact of a food hygiene intervention on complementary food contamination in Bangladesh. A three-year homestead food production intervention was complemented by an eight-month behavior change module to improve household food hygiene practices and evaluated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial including a dedicated study measuring outcomes along the hygiene pathway to intestinal health. In this analysis, we used multilevel regression to assess the intervention’s impact on microbial food contamination, as well as on food hygiene knowledge (n=518) and reported practices (n=531) among mothers of children aged 6-23 months. Complementary food samples were collected from 342 households with children aged 6-18 months and tested for Escherichia coli. Overall, 46% of food samples were contaminated with Escherichia coli (42% intervention, 49% control), and there was no evidence that the intervention reduced food contamination (Odds Ratio: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.3-1.2, p=0.18). A higher proportion of intervention mothers could name all key food hygiene practices (22% intervention vs. 0% control), had access to a basic handwashing station near the kitchen (24% vs. 14%, p=0.03), reported washing hands before food preparation and child feeding (21% vs. 8%, p=0.001), washing and storing feeding utensils safely (61% vs. 49%, p=0.02), and preparing food fresh or reheating stored food (88% vs. 79%, p=0.03), compared to control mothers. The intervention thus improved knowledge and reported food hygiene practices among mothers, but this improvement did not result in a substantial reduction of complementary food contamination.
Trial registration number NCT02505711
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02505711
Funding Statement
The FAARM trial was primarily funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant number: 01ER1201). The FHEED study was financially supported by a project grant from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation; Project number: 413269709). Foundation Fiat Panis further supported FHEED's research work. Helen Keller International received additional support from the Carrefour social responsibility program and other charitable donations for implementing the homestead food production program. Sabine Gabrysch received funding through a Recruiting Grant from Stiftung Charité. Funding organizations had no role in the trial design, the intervention or its implementation, in training, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was positively reviewed and approved by the following ethics committees: Ethikkommission Medizinische Fakultaet Heidelberg at Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg, Germany (Ref.: S-121/2014 and Ref.: S-606/2017), Ethical Review Committee of James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Ref.: 37A), and Institutional Review Board (Research Review Committee and Ethical Review Committee) of icddr,b (formerly known as the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh), Dhaka Bangladesh (Ref.: PR-17126).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
A deidentified dataset with the individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article is available to interested researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data. A data access agreement will need to be signed to gain access to the data.
