Vaccine-related misinformation and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination in Japan

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. To reduce the death toll, novel vaccines have been developed and administered (1). Vaccination for COVID-19 in Japan started in February 2021. During the time, “one million shots per day” was aimed by the Japanese government to increase vaccination coverage as high and as rapidly as possible (2).

However, we have faced vaccine hesitancy at that time. Many people are especially concerned about the effectiveness and safety of mRNA vaccines, a new biomedical technology that had not been practically applied before the pandemic (3). Furthermore, misinformation regarding COVID-19 and its vaccines has spread worldwide, dubbed an infodemic (4,5). Those include unfounded allegations like “governments hide the causal association between vaccination and autism” or “the COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a man-made virus to control the global population by vaccination.” Such misinformation has been reported to be associated with vaccine hesitancy (6).

Still, some people must have received vaccination even if they believed vaccine-related misinformation. How often that happened and what determined the behavior are largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of people who believed misinformation regarding COVID-19 vaccines by vaccination status, factors associated with misinformation beliefs, and how they have affected attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination in Japan.

Methods

Results

Of the 31,000 participants in the JACSIS study in 2021, 28,175 (90.9 %) provided valid responses (7). Among them, 83.2% (23,435) were already vaccinated for COVID-19, 3.4% (968) were waiting for vaccination, 6.2% (1,740) were undecided about whether to get vaccinated, 6.4% (1,800) decided not to get vaccinated, and 0.8% (232) responded that they could not get vaccinated for medical reasons, such as allergies (Table 2).

No vaccine-related misinformation was believed in 88.9% (25,041) of the participants. Among the already vaccinated people, 8.1% believed at least one of the seven misinformation items (Table 1, Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure 1). In contrast, 36.6% of those who refused vaccination believed misinformation. To put it the other way around, 88.1% of people who did not believe misinformation were willing to be vaccinated, while 63.6% of misinformation believers accepted vaccination (Figure 1B). Vaccine acceptance rates declined as the number of believed misinformation items increased.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and misinformation beliefs A) The prevalence of beliefs about vaccine-related misinformation was stratified by attitudes toward vaccination. B) The proportions of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy were shown by the number of believed misinformation items. “1–7” indicates people who believed at least one vaccine-related misinformation item. The survey results were adjusted for age, residence, educational level, marital status, and self-rated health consciousness to fit the general population in Japan. The results for each age group are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

Younger age; living by oneself; unmarried; lower education level; not having physical comorbidity; having a mental illness; history of COVID-19 infection; not knowing friends who had contracted COVID-19 before; not getting information about COVID-19 and its vaccination from friends, medical doctors, governments, newspapers, or television; getting information from the Internet including social media; and lower income were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy (Table 3). In addition, the number of believed vaccine-related misinformation items was strongly associated with vaccine hesitancy, with odds ratios ranging from 2.1 (believed one misinformation item) to 17.5 (believed seven misinformation items). Hence, many factors associated with vaccine hesitancy overlapped with those related to beliefs about misinformation. Younger age; living by oneself; unmarried; having a mental illness; history of COVID-19 infection; having family members and friends who had contracted COVID-19 before; not getting information from governments, newspapers, or television; getting information from the Internet; and lower income were significantly associated with an increase in the number of believed misinformation items (Table 4).

We noticed that many people who believed vaccine-related misinformation still accepted vaccination (Figure 1B) and wondered whether any factors affected their attitudes toward vaccination differently between individuals who did not believe misinformation and those who did. Figure 2 shows the odds ratios for vaccine hesitancy in the two stratified groups. Although the direction of the associations was the same for most factors between the two groups, two findings were notable. First, age had the opposite effect. Whereas older age showed a strong association with vaccine acceptance among non-misinformation believers, there was a positive association between younger age and vaccine acceptance among misinformation believers. Second, the effects of some information sources were more evident among individuals who believed misinformation. The association between an information source from television and vaccine acceptance was stronger among misinformation believers than non-misinformation believers. An information source from the Internet was found to be more closely linked to vaccine hesitancy in misinformation believers than in non-misinformation believers.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in non-misinformation and misinformation believers The age-adjusted odds ratios for vaccine hesitancy in non-misinformation believers (zero believed misinformation items) and misinformation believers (2 or more believed misinformation items) are shown. Vertical lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

In this study, we reported the prevalence of people who believed vaccine-related misinformation in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations in Japan through an online survey that included over 30,000 participants. We also identified the risk factors associated with misinformation beliefs and vaccine hesitancy.

The spread of misinformation and vaccine hesitancy are major hurdles in the fight against COVID-19. As with previous studies, we found that many factors, such as the absence of cohabiters, low income, particular information sources, and history of COVID-19 infection, are associated with misinformation beliefs and vaccination reluctance (10–12). An interesting observation of the present study is that the effect of misinformation on vaccine hesitancy is weak in the younger generation (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 1B), although COVID-19 vaccination coverage is generally high for older adults (1). While information from the Internet helps misinformation-believers have a more obstinate attitude toward vaccine hesitancy, information from television showed a positive effect on vaccine acceptance, even for individuals who believed vaccine-related misinformation. Further studies on these mechanisms will allow us to develop effective strategies to increase vaccination coverage in the midst of an infodemic.

Our study has several limitations. The generalizability of the results is limited, as we conducted the survey only for residents of Japan at a certain time. As the participants were recruited through an online platform, we cannot rule out the existence of selection bias. Although we statistically adjusted our data to the general population in the country, this could have been insufficient. In addition, the self-report of vaccination status in the survey was not verified by official records.

COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Japan is very high, reaching >80% of eligible people by the end of 2021 (1). We found that 88.9% of the study participants did not believe vaccine-related misinformation. In addition, among those who believed misinformation, 63.6% accepted vaccination. However, there is a growing trend of vaccine hesitancy today. For example, the coverage of regular vaccinations, such as one for measles, has recently decreased in Japan and other countries (13,14). As the spread of misinformation repeatedly hinders countermeasures for past infectious disease outbreaks (15), this tide should not be disregarded for the next pandemic. Our study underscores the importance of understanding risk factors for misinformation beliefs in relation to vaccine hesitancy.

Author contributions

TT was a major contributor to the JACSIS survey. YF analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the first draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.