Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe

INTRODUCTION

Deploying community health workers (CHWs) is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1–4]. Community health workers are voluntary public health workers who play a crucial role of primary and tertiary prevention of diseases[5]. Implementation of public health interventions through CHWs can facilitate the linkage between communities and health services and thus ensure community participation. For many years, CHWs in LMICs have been providing community-based care, but their efforts have been focused on home-based caring for people living with the HIV and TB, with little being done around non-communicable diseases[5]. This is despite an increase in the burden of NCDs in LMICs over the recent years. Worldwide, NCDs kill 41 million people each year, which is equivalent to 74% of all deaths globally[6,7]. Each year, 17 million people die from a NCD before the age of 70 and 86% of these premature deaths occur in LMICs . Overall, 77% of all NCDs deaths are in LMICs. Amongst all NCDs, cardiovascular diseases account for most NCD deaths, with 17.9 million deaths annually[6,7].

The contribution of CHWs to infectious chronic diseases care in many LMICs suggests they could play a significant role in NCDs management in these countries. Management of NCDs in these countries is often poor with health systems struggling with several challenges that include staff shortages[8]. Hence involvement of CHWs in the management of NCDs is important. In the countries where the CHWs participated in the management of NCDs, their roles had included education and awareness, screening and monitoring, support for medication and lifestyle modification adherence, referral to healthcare professionals and advocating for healthier environments[5,9,10].

Diabetes and hypertension are amongst the most prevalent NCDs worldwide and CHW-led interventions for these conditions are increasing becoming popular in LMICs[11]. Overall, CHWs provide additional workforce for the management and care of hypertension and diabetes patients where resources are limited and allow for task shifting to alleviate overstretched health systems [12,13]. Several studies have reported positive outcomes for CHWs interventions such as reduced cardiovascular risk, improved medication adherence, improved lifestyle modification and improved quality of life[3,14–18]. Community health workers can play a beneficial role in improving health outcomes among diabetes and hypertensive patients, while improving equity in health care delivery[19] (Jeet et al. 2017)]. As a result, it is increasingly recommended that services be offered outside of health facilities in communities, to address the rising burden of hypertension and diabetes.

There are several studies that indicate that the global increase in the burden of hypertension and diabetes has seen a growing use of CHWs to support patients on treatment and this has resulted in good clinical outcomes. In a scoping review of 54 articles on the role of community health workers in type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management, it was concluded that CHWs play several roles, including structured education, ongoing support and health system advocacy [20]. Another review on studies evaluating the effectiveness of community-based interventions for prevention of Type 2 diabetes in LMICs also confirmed the successful use of CHWs in management of type 2 diabetes [21]. Gyawali and Kallestrup recommended that more evidence from randomized controlled trials on culturally tailored, community-based interventions is needed to compare findings and test implementation in practice[21]. In a participatory qualitative research project carried out by Chimberengwa and Naidoo, it was concluded that in management of hypertension, CHWs were a key link between the community and the formal health delivery care system [18].

Whilst there is substantial evidence that CHW programs improve a range of health outcomes, these benefits tend to reduce or disappear when CHW programs are scaled up. One of the reasons for the reduction is low uptake of the interventions. Low uptake of public health interventions can be a result of poor acceptability[22]. Acceptability has increasingly become a key consideration in the design and implementation of public health interventions[22] . Successful implementation and uptake of a public health intervention depend on acceptability of the intervention by health care providers, communities, and the patients. For instance, if an intervention is considered acceptable by patients, they are more likely to adhere to treatment recommendations and thus benefit from improved clinical outcome. Likewise, if healthcare providers consider an intervention as acceptable, they are more likely to deliver it as intended, which also enhances the effectiveness of the intervention.

In Zimbabwe, CHWs provide community-based care, but for years, their efforts have been focused on home-based care for people with HIV and TB, with little done around NCDs[23]. This shows the need to continuously come up with effective CHW-led interventions for management common NCDs. This paper reports on a qualitative study to assess the acceptability of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. The study was imbedded in a cluster randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

METHODS

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

As the burden of NCDs continue to rise worldwide, LMICs continue to struggle to manage these conditions due to several challenges, that include staff shortages[26]. One emerging global strategy to address staff shortages in management of chronic conditions is using CHWs to reach vulnerable populations in under-resourced settings[27]. Several reviews have found that over 60% of CHWs in LMIC performed some sort of home-based care; however, most of these efforts focused on HIV/AIDS, immunization and cancer and their work has also been mainly in rural areas[28,29]. Expanding on this work, we conducted a cluster randomized to assess the effects of community health worker -led health literacy intervention for lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients that we designed[24] . To enhance our assessment of the intervention, we embedded a qualitative acceptability study on this cluster randomized trial. Our study aimed to explore the acceptability of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertension and diabetes patients in the City of Harare.

Findings from our study indicated that, the intervention is generally acceptable by the patients, the CHWs and community nurses, based on five dimensions, which are perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived compatibility, perceived feasibility and perceived effectiveness. Interventions involving community health workers have been proven to be acceptable in other settings world-wide [22,30]. This could be because CHWs are respectable community members, hence their advice can be easily accepted within communities. The fact that they undergo some training also enhances their acceptability in the communities that they serve. Training was highlighted as the key facilitators of acceptability of CHWs in a rural area in South Africa [2].

Whilst our intervention was perceived to have many benefits by all the categories of participants (patients, CHWs and nurses), it is also important to take note of the potential challenges that were mentioned by the patients and the CHWs. Patients were concerned that the CHWs may not be competent to respond to some of their questions. This is an important finding which should not be ignored when scaling up the intervention. One strategy of addressing this concern is through thorough training of CHWs before implementing the intervention and close support and supervision by nurses during implementation. As highlighted by Stansert et al, CHWs are accepted when the community know that they are trained and when they receive occasional support from professional healthcare workers [2] The CHWs themselves also highlighted the need for extra support in terms of transport and financial allowances. This should also be considered when scaling up the intervention. Inadequate resources has been highlighted as one of the key challenges that hinder effective implementation of CHW interventions in LMICs[5,30,31], hence in needs to be addressed to ensure programme success.

Our study has several notable strengths. We conducted the study during the implementation of the intervention. Therefore, recall bias was minimized since the participants were still recalling their experience with the implementation of the intervention. We also assessed the acceptability from the perspectives of all those categories of people who are key to the success of the intervention (the beneficiaries-patients, the implementers-CHWs and the supervisors-community nurses). Therefore, our findings are quite rich. Nevertheless, there are some limitations to our study. We cannot rule out the possibility of social desirability bias, particularly from the patients and the CHWs. There is a possibility that they could not have highlighted the potential challenges of the intervention because the principal investigator was involved in the conduct of the in-depth interviews and the focus group discussions. We tried to minimize this by limiting the role of the principal investigator to recording responses only. Two research assistants who were not part of the intervention are the ones who interviewed participants and facilitated focus group discussions. Secondly, results on the perceived effectiveness could be limited because the data was collected during the implementation of the intervention, such that the ultimate benefit may not have been experience. To this end, we recommend a post acceptability assessment. Nonetheless, the results for this study provide valuable information for upscaling of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Although there is vast evidence regarding effectiveness of community-based interventions for NCDs, effectiveness alone does not guarantee the success of public health interventions. Acceptability is also important, because many effective interventions may not yield the expected results due to low uptake resulting from unacceptable interventions. Our community health worker-led health literacy intervention for lifestyle modification intervention was perceived as having many benefits and thus acceptable by hypertension and diabetes patients, community health workers and community nurses in the city of Harare.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The consent and ethical approvals for this study does not have any restrictions for data sharing. Therefore, the data sets generated from this study will be made available to the public upon request.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

NAK: conceptualisation of study, data collection, data analysis and drafting of first draft and subsequent drafts leading to the final manuscript; ED and AD; data collection, data analysis and reviewing of initial manuscript and subsequent drafts . SR, SS and GTF: Reviewing of study proposal, reviewing of initial manuscript and subsequent drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.