Summary
Background Evidence suggests that individuals with intellectual disabilities may be at increased risk of affective and non-affective psychotic disorders. However, studies so far have been limited by small and selected samples. Moreover, the role of early life trauma, a key environmental risk factor for psychosis, in the potential associations is unknown.
Methods Using data from Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort, we investigated the associations between ID, psychotic disorders, and psychotic experiences in adulthood, and assessed the potential mediating role of trauma in childhood. Individuals with intellectual disabilities were identified using a multisource measure utilising cognitive, functional, and diagnostic indicators from ALSPAC combined with health and administrative records. Psychotic disorder clinical diagnoses were extracted through linkage to primary care records. Psychotic experiences were assessed at ages 18 and 24 using the semi-structured Psychosis-Like Symptoms interview (PLIKSi). Traumatic experiences between ages 5 and 11 were assessed with questionnaires and interviews administered to children and parents at multiple ages. Multiple imputation was performed across all analyses to mitigate potential bias due to missing data.
Findings The maximum sample after multiple imputation was 9,407. We found evidence of associations between intellectual disabilities and psychotic disorders (OR= 4.57; 95%CI: 1.56-13.39). Evidence was weaker in the case of psychotic experiences (OR=1.63; 95%CI: 0.93-2.84). There was some evidence suggesting a potential mediating role of traumatic experiences in the associations between ID and psychotic experiences (OR= 1.09; 95%CI: 1.03-1.15). Evidence was less consistent in the case of psychotic disorders. Complete records analyses yielded comparable estimates.
Interpretation Intellectual disabilities are associated with psychotic disorders and experiences in young adulthood. Further research into the contribution of trauma could shape current intervention strategies for psychotic disorders in this population.
Funding The Baily Thomas Charitable Fund
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This publication is the work of the authors and CD & PMD will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. CD is supported by a grant from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) which forms part of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00032/06). DR and PMD are supported by the Baily Thomas Charitable Fund [TRUST/VC/AC/SG/6075-9277]. PMD also acknowledges support from the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00032/02)). GMK acknowledges funding support from the MRC (MC_UU_00032/06; MR/W014416/1; MR/S037675/1; and MR/Z50354X/1), the Wellcome Trust (201486/Z/16/Z and 201486/B/16/Z), and the UK National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at the University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol (NIHR 203315). HJJ, DR and PMD also acknowledges funding from the NIHR Bristol BRC (NIHR 203315). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. J.F.G.U. is supported by aGW4-CAT Clinical Doctoral Fellowship (22284921) and an HEIW Welsh Clinical Academic Training Fellowship. LH is supported by an Early Career Fellowship from the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute (University of Bristol) & Rosetrees Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
For data collected via questionnaires and clinics, informed consent was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees (NHS Haydock REC: 10/H1010/70)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Individual-level data from the ALSPAC birth cohort are not publicly available for reasons of clinical confidentiality. Data can be accessed after application to the ALSPAC Executive Team who will respond within 10 working days. Application instructions and data use agreements are available at http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/. The code used to conduct these analyses can be found in the repository: https://github.com/pmadleydowd/BailyThomas-IntellectualDisability-and-MentalHealth
