Use of robust norming to create a sensitive cognitive summary score in de novo Parkinson’s disease

Daniel Weintraub; Michael C. Brumm; Ryan Kurth; Michele K. York; the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative

doi:10.1101/2024.07.08.24310076

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives Cognitive impairment is common at all stages in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the field is hampered by consensus over which neuropsychological tests to use and how to utilize the results generated by a cognitive battery. An option that combines the richness of a neuropsychological battery with the simplicity of a single test score is a cognitive summary score (CSS). The objective was to determine if a CSS created using robust norming is sensitive in detecting early cognitive deficits in de novo, untreated PD.

Methods Using baseline cognitive data from PD participants and healthy controls (HCs) in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative, these steps were taken: (1) creating a robust HC subgroup that did not demonstrate cognitive decline over time; (2) using the robust HC subgroup to create regression-based internally-derived standardized scores (z-scores) for six cognitive scores across five tests; and (3) creating a CSS by averaging all standardized test z-scores.

Results PD participants scored worse than HCs on all cognitive tests, with a larger effect size (PD versus HCs) when the comparison group was the robust HC subgroup compared with all HCs. Applying internally-derived norms rather than published norms, the largest cognitive domain effect sizes (PD vs. robust HCs) were for processing speed/working memory (Cohen’s d= -0.55) and verbal episodic memory (Cohen’s d= -0.48 and -0.52). In addition, using robust norming shifted PD performance from the middle of the average range (CSS z-score= -0.01) closer to low average (CSS z-score= -0.40), with the CSS having a larger effect size (PD vs. robust HC subgroup; Cohen’s d= -0.60) compared with all individual cognitive tests.

Discussion PD patients perform worse cognitively than HC at disease diagnosis on multiple cognitive domains, particularly information processing speed and verbal memory. Using robust norming increases effect sizes and lowers the scores of PD patients to “expected” levels. The CSS performed better than all individual cognitive tests. A CSS developed using a robust norming process may be sensitive to cognitive changes in the earliest stages of PD and have utility as an outcome measure in clinical research, including clinical trials.

Competing Interest Statement

To be included in published paper.

Clinical Protocols

https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n92ldmw6ol5b/v2

Funding Statement

PPMI, a public-private partnership, is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and funding partners, including 4D Pharma, Abbvie, AcureX, Allergan, Amathus Therapeutics, Aligning Science Across Parkinson's, AskBio, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, BIAL, BioArctic, Biogen, Biohaven, BioLegend, BlueRock Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Capsida Biotherapeutics, Celgene, Cerevel Therapeutics, Coave Therapeutics, DaCapo Brainscience, Denali, Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, Gain Therapeutics, GE HealthCare, Genentech, GSK, Golub Capital, Handl Therapeutics, Insitro, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Mission Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neuron23, Neuropore, Pfizer, Piramal, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Takeda, Teva, UCB, Vanqua Bio, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics, the Weston Family Foundation and Yumanity Therapeutics.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

PPMI data used in the preparation of this article were obtained November 6, 2023 from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data), RRID:SCR 006431. This analysis was conducted by the PPMI Statistics Core and used actual dates of activity for participants, a restricted data element not available to public users of PPMI data. PPMI data are publicly available from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data). For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

↵* See Supplementary Table_PPMI Authorship List
Funding: Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (Research Grant “Creation and Performance of a Composite Cognitive Test Score in Parkinson Disease”; Grant ID: MJFF-022598)

Data Availability

https://www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.