Abstract
INTRODUCTION Switzerland has an ongoing debate about the appropriateness of national growth reference curves. The Swiss Society of Pediatrics currently recommends the growth references of the World Health Organization (WHO), while the Center for Pediatric Endocrinology Zurich has proposed alternative growth references based on local data. Specialists and researchers also use International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) references to define overweight and obesity. We investigated the fit of these three growth references to anthropometric measurements from schoolchildren in the canton of Zurich and assessed the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and short stature across the three references.
METHODS We analyzed data from 3755 children aged 6-17 years of the cross sectional LuftiBus in the school (LUIS) study, collected between 2013-2016 in the canton of Zurich. We calculated z-scores of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) based on WHO, local, and IOTF references. We compared the mean and distribution of z-scores to the expected standard normal distribution using the Anderson-Darling test. We classified BMI based on cutoff values given by the three references: overweight (WHO: >90.0th percentile; local: >82.9[girls], >78.9[boys]; IOTF: >89.3[girls], >90.5[boys]), and obesity (WHO: >97.0; local: >96.8[girls], >95.5[boys]; IOTF: >98.6[girls], >98.9[boys]). We defined short stature as <3rd percentile of height-for-age.
RESULTS The mean z-scores in LUIS were 0.56 for height, 0.28 for weight, and 0.06 for BMI based on WHO references; 0.15 for height, 0.06 for weight, and -0.01 for BMI based on local references; and 0.19 for BMI based on IOTF references. WHO references provided a worse fit to the LUIS children than local references. Anderson-Darling goodness of fit A2 was 578.1 (WHO) vs. 48.1 (local) for height and 124.0 vs. 10.0 for weight, with lower values indicating better fit. WHO (A2: 24.3) and local references (A2: 0.8) fit the BMI of LUIS children better than IOTF (A2: 64.1). The WHO classified fewer children as overweight than the local and IOTF references (WHO: 9% vs. local: 15% vs. IOTF: 13%) but more children as obese (6% vs. 4% vs. 3%). The WHO defined fewer children as being of short stature than the local references (1% vs. 3%).
CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that anthropometric data of schoolchildren in Zurich differ notably from WHO and IOTF references potentially leading to misclassification of overweight, obesity, and short stature. Nationally representative and longitudinally collected data are needed to develop new Swiss growth references.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Lunge Zurich, Switzerland, funded the study set-up, development, and data collection with a grant to Alexander Moeller. This data analysis was supported through the grant NDS-2021-911 (SwissPedHealth) from the Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN) and the Strategic Focal Area Personalized Health and Related Technologies (PHRT) of the ETH Domain (Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the canton of Zurich (Kantonale Ethik Komission Zurich, Number: 2014-0491) and informed consent was obtained prior to participation
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Researchers can obtain datasets for analysis if a detailed concept sheet is presented for the planned analyses and approved by the principal investigators (Alexander Moeller, Philipp Latzin and Claudia Kuehni).
