ABSTRACT
Background Handgrip strength has been related with multiple health outcomes, including all-cause mortality and morbidity. Handgrip testing is a highly valid and reliable method, included in evidence-based fitness test batteries from preschool to older ages. Previously, Jamar and TKK dynamometers have shown good reliability and validity against known weights. However, the cost of these dynamometers is the major limitation for implementing handgrip strength testing in certain countries and settings, as well as at large scale. Recently, a ten times cheaper model (Camry Dynamometer) has been used in fitness surveillance systems, though its reliability and validity, compared to known weights and other well-validated dynamometers, remains unknown. Therefore, the aims of the current study were to test to examine test-retest reliability, inter-model reliability (comparing a Camry dynamometer with 3000 uses versus a new Camry dynamometer), and inter-instrument reliability (Camry versus TKK dynamometer) of Camry dynamometer, using calibrated known weights.
Methods A digital TKK 5401 dynamometer and two Camry EH101, a new and an “old” (3000 uses), dynamometers were used. Intra-instrument and inter-instrument reliability, and criterion related validity were assessed comparing the measures of the dynamometers with calibrated weights using the Bland and Altman’s method.
Results Intra-instrument (retest minus test) reliability was very high (systematic error for test-retest reliability: New Camry = 0.01±0.49kg; Old Camry = -0.10±0.49kg; TKK = 0.14±0.77kg). The comparison between instruments showed small mean differences between Camry dynamometers and TKK (New Camry VS TKK: 0.84±0.79kg; Old Camry VS TKK: 0.88 ±0.85kg). The systematic error between New and Old Camry dynamometers was 0.03±0.57kg. Criterion-related validity showed smaller magnitude systematic errors in the Camry than TKK instruments (New Camry: -0.21±0.35kg; Old Camry: -0.18±0.79kg; TKK: -1.07±0.75kg).
Conclusions Our results support that Camry dynamometer has an excellent reliability and validity and is therefore a more affordable alternative for handgrip strength assessment. Our results also indicate a good durability of these devices, and that calibration is not necessary, even after several thousands of uses.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is mainly supported by the Grant PID2020-120249RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the Andalusian Government (Junta de Andalucia, Plan Andaluz de Investigacion, ref. P20_00124). LSA and JFO are supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FPU 21/06192 and FPU 22/03052, respectively). IMF is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (JDC2022-049642-I). AT has received funding from the Junta de Andalucia, Spain, under the Postdoctoral Research Fellows (Ref. POSTDOC_21_00745).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
