Abstract
The differential impact on working memory (WM) performance of distractors presented either at encoding or during maintenance was investigated in Alzheimer’s (AD), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and healthy ageing. Across three studies, 28 AD and 28 PD patients, 28 elderly (EHC) and 28 young healthy controls (YHC) were enrolled. All participants performed a delayed reproduction task, where they reported the orientation of an arrow from a study set of either two or three items, with a distractor present either at encoding or at maintenance. Mean absolute error (the difference between probed and reported orientation) was calculated as an analogue measure of WM. Additionally, mixture model metrics i.e., memory precision, target detection, misbinding (swapping the features of an object with another probed item) and guessing were computed. MRI data was also acquired in AD, PD and EHC participants, and whole hippocampal volumes were extracted to test whether WM filtering and overall performance were related to hippocampal integrity.
EHC and PD patients showed good filtering abilities both at encoding and during maintenance. However, AD patients exhibited significant filtering deficits specifically when the distractor appeared during maintenance. Healthy ageing and AD were associated with higher rates of both misbinding and guessing, as well as lower target detection, and memory precision. However, in healthy ageing there was a prominent decline in WM memory precision, whilst in AD lower target detection and higher guessing were the main sources of error. Conversely, PD was associated only with higher guessing rates. Hippocampal volume was significantly correlated with filtering during maintenance – but not at encoding – as well as with overall mean absolute error, target detection, guessing and misbinding. These findings demonstrate how healthy ageing and neurodegenerative diseases exhibit distinct patterns of WM impairment, including differential effects on filtering irrelevant material presented at encoding and maintenance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship to Masud Husain and by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [Grant Number: 206330/Z/17/Z]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Oxford Medical Sciences Inter-Divisional Research Ethics Committee (MS IDREC).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
