Abstract
Introduction Proper management of diabetes mellitus (DM) is essential to prevent long-term complications, improve patients’ quality of life, and reduce the economic burden on healthcare services.
Objective To determine the factors associated with the number of medical consultations received in the last quarter by patients with different types of diabetes affiliated with the Comprehensive Health Insurance (SIS: acronym in Spanish) in Peru.
Methods A cross-sectional analysis of the database of patients with DM affiliated with SIS in Peru was conducted. Two robust variance regression models were used to identify potential associated factors.
Results Data from 1,355,354 patients were analyzed. In model 1, which included comorbidities as separate variables, it was found that men, older individuals (especially those aged 60-69), and residents of the jungle region had a higher probability of receiving more medical consultations. The presence of obesity/dyslipidemia, hypertension, and mental health disorders also increased the likelihood of more consultations. In comparison, patients with type 2 DM had fewer consultations compared to those with type 1 DM. The findings were consistent with the first model in model 2, which included the total number of comorbidities instead of each separately. Additionally, a higher total number of comorbidities was associated with an increased number of medical consultations.
Conclusions Several vital factors influencing the frequency of medical consultations received by DM patients have been identified. Adapting healthcare services to address regional disparities in access to and use of medical services is crucial.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is self-financed.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Joan A. Loayza-Castro, loayzacastrojoan{at}gmail.com
Enrique Vigil-Ventura, enrique.vigil{at}untrm.edu.pe
Rafael Tapia-Limonchi, rafael.tapia{at}untrm.edu.pe
Data Availability
The data supporting the findings of this study can be accessed by the original research paper at the follow link: https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/afiliados-activos-en-el-seguro-integral-de-salud-con-diagn%C3%B3stico-de-diabetes-mellitus-sis
https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/afiliados-activos-en-el-seguro-integral-de-salud-con-diagn%C3%B3stico-de-diabetes-mellitus-sis