Abstract
Purpose Auditory processing disorder (APD) has been studied in both research and clinic settings, but the relation between the two has not been addressed. In a longitudinal research study (SICLiD), we found that children with clinically normal audiometry who had caregiver-reported listening difficulties (LiD), with or without clinically assessed APD, performed poorly on both listening and cognitive tests. Specific questions asked here were, for the children with LiD, what other neurodevelopmental clinical conditions were identified, what interventions were used by different clinical providers, and how clinical practice was predicted by research results.
Methods Study setting was a large, research-led, tertiary pediatric hospital. Electronic medical records of 74 children aged 6-13 years, recruited into SICLiD and assigned to an LiD group based on a validated and reliable caregiver report (ECLiPS), were independently reviewed. Focus was on clinical assessments and interventions following appointments provided in the Hospital Divisions of Audiology, Occupational Therapy, Psychology (Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics), and Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), prior to participation in SICLiD. Descriptive statistics on clinical encounters, identified conditions, and interventions were compared with quantitative, standardized performance on SICLiD assessments of listening and cognitive function. SICLiD z-scores were compared for participants with and without each clinical condition using univariate and logistic prediction analyses.
Results Most (86%) of the children with LiD had been evaluated by at least one clinical service. Overall, 24 assessment categories related to LiD, including APD, were identified. Most common conditions were attention (32%), language (28%), hearing (18%), anxiety (16%), and autism spectrum (6%) disorders. Performance on SICLiD measures varied significantly between providers, conditions, and interventions. Significant relationships between SICLiD and clinical conditions were mostly caregiver-reported items from the ECLiPS or the Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC-2). Other significant correlations were scarce, but included the SCAN composite score, which predicted clinical language and attention, but not other auditory abilities or APD. SICLiD data combined with caregiver reports provided reliable predictions of all clinical conditions except APD.
Conclusions The variety of disciplines, assessments, conditions and interventions revealed here supports previous studies showing that LiD and APD are multifaceted problems of neurodevelopment. Comparisons between clinical- and research-based assessments suggest a diagnostic path that prioritizes caregiver reports and selected psychometric tests for screening and diagnostic purposes.
Competing Interest Statement
David Moore is a paid consultant and stock holder of hearX Group
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH DC014078 and the Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- APD
- Auditory Processing Disorder
- AUROC
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic
- CCC-2
- Children’s Communication Checklist (2nd edition)
- CCC GCC
- Children’s Communication Checklist – General Communication Composite
- CCC SIDI
- Children’s Communication Checklist – Social interaction difference index
- CCHMC
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
- DL
- Bergen Dichotic Listening Test
- DL l -15
- DL laterality score with an ILD = -15 dB
- ECLiPS EAS
- ECLiPS Environmental and Auditory Sensitivity subscale
- ECLiPS
- Everyday Children’s Listening and Processing Scale
- ECLiPS LLL
- ECLiPS Literacy/Language/Laterality subscale
- ECLiPS MA
- ECLiPS Memory and Attention subscale
- ECLiPS PSS
- ECLiPS Pragmatic and Social Skills subscale
- ECLiPS SAP
- ECLiPS Speech and Auditory Processing subscale
- NIH FC
- Fluid reasoning Composite score of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH FT
- Flanker test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- ILD
- Interaural level difference
- LiD
- Listening Difficulties
- LiSN-S
- Listening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences test
- LiSN HC
- LiSN-S High Cue subscale
- LiSN LC
- LiSN-S Low Cue subscale
- LiSN SA
- LiSN-S Spatial Advantage subscale
- LiSN TA
- LiSN-S Talker Advantage subscale
- NIH
- National Institutes of Health Cognition Toolbox
- NIH CC
- Crystalized reasoning Composite score of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH DCCS
- Directional Change Card Sorting test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH ECC
- Early Childhood Composite score of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH LS
- List sorting test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH ORR
- Oral reading recognition test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH PC
- Pattern comparison processing speed test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH PV
- Picture Vocabulary test of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- NIH TC
- Total Composite score of NIH Cognition Toolbox
- OR
- Odds ratio
- PE
- Tympanic pressure equalization tubes
- SCAN AFG
- SCAN Auditory Figure-Ground subscale
- SCAN FW
- SCAN Filtered Words subscale
- SCAN CS
- SCAN Competing Sentences subscale
- SCAN CWD
- SCAN Competing Words subscale
- SICLiD
- Sensitive Indicators of Childhood Listening Difficulties (study)
- TD
- Typically Developing
- VIF
- Variance inflation factor